• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2016 年纽约市应对寨卡病毒病新兴威胁期间,不同类型医疗服务提供者和不同医疗环境下利用公共卫生和其他信息资源的情况。

Variations in Healthcare Provider Use of Public Health and Other Information Sources by Provider Type and Practice Setting During New York City's Response to the Emerging Threat of Zika Virus Disease, 2016.

机构信息

Celia Quinn, MD, is a Career Epidemiology Field Officer, Field Services Branch, Division of State and Local Readiness, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, and with the Office of Emergency Preparedness and Response, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY. Eugenie Poirot, PhD, is an Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer, Division of Scientific Education and Professional Development, CDC, Atlanta, and with the Division of Epidemiology, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Afua Sanders Kim is Executive Director, IT Informatics, Information Technology, and Telecommunications; Aishwarya L. Viswanath, MPH, is Research Scientist, Bureau of Agency Preparedness and Response; and Sneha N. Patel, MSW, MPH, is Director of Evaluation, Bureau of Agency Preparedness and Response, Office of Emergency Preparedness and Response; all in the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY. David M. Abramson, PhD, is Clinical Associate Professor, and Rachael Piltch-Loeb, MSPH, is a doctoral candidate; both in the College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY.

出版信息

Health Secur. 2018 Jul/Aug;16(4):252-261. doi: 10.1089/hs.2018.0026.

DOI:10.1089/hs.2018.0026
PMID:30133373
Abstract

The New York City (NYC) Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) used multiple methods to provide guidance to healthcare providers on the management and prevention of Zika virus disease during 2016. To better understand providers' use of information sources related to emerging disease threats, this article describes reported use of information sources by NYC providers to stay informed about Zika, and patterns observed by provider type and practice setting. We sent an electronic survey to all email addresses in the Provider Data Warehouse, a system used to maintain information from state and local health department sources on all prescribing healthcare providers in NYC. The survey asked providers about their use of information sources, including specific information products offered by the NYC DOHMH, to stay informed about Zika during 2016. Trends by provider type and practice setting were described using summary statistics. The survey was sent to 44,455 unique email addresses; nearly 20% (8,711) of the emails were undeliverable. Ultimately, 1,447 (5.8%) eligible providers completed the survey. Most respondents (79%) were physicians. Overall, the most frequently reported source of information from the NYC DOHMH was the NYC Health Alert Network (73%). Providers in private practice reported that they did not use any NYC DOHMH source of information about Zika more frequently than did those working in hospital settings (29% vs 23%); similarly, private practitioners reported that they did not use any other source of information about Zika more frequently than did those working in hospital settings (16% vs 8%). Maintaining timely and accurate databases of healthcare provider contact information is a challenge for local public health agencies. Effective strategies are needed to identify and engage independently practicing healthcare providers to improve communications with all healthcare providers during public health emergencies.

摘要

纽约市(NYC)卫生与心理卫生部(DOHMH)在 2016 年期间使用多种方法为医疗保健提供者提供有关寨卡病毒病管理和预防的指导。为了更好地了解提供者对与新发疾病威胁相关信息源的使用情况,本文描述了纽约市提供者为了解寨卡病毒而报告使用的信息源,并观察了按提供者类型和实践环境观察到的模式。我们向 Provider Data Warehouse 中的所有电子邮件地址发送了一份电子调查,这是一个系统,用于从州和地方卫生部门来源维护有关纽约市所有开处方医疗保健提供者的信息。该调查询问了提供者在 2016 年期间为了解寨卡病毒而使用信息源的情况,包括纽约市 DOHMH 提供的特定信息产品。按提供者类型和实践环境描述了趋势,使用了汇总统计数据。该调查发送给了 44455 个唯一的电子邮件地址;其中近 20%(8711 个)电子邮件无法送达。最终,有 1447 名(5.8%)合格的提供者完成了调查。大多数受访者(79%)是医生。总体而言,来自纽约市 DOHMH 的信息最常被报告的来源是纽约市健康警报网络(73%)。私人诊所的提供者报告说,他们使用的任何来自纽约市 DOHMH 的有关寨卡病毒的信息源都不比医院环境中的提供者更频繁(29%比 23%);同样,私人医生报告说,他们使用的任何其他有关寨卡病毒的信息源都不比医院环境中的提供者更频繁(16%比 8%)。维护医疗保健提供者联系信息的及时和准确数据库是地方公共卫生机构面临的挑战。需要有效的策略来识别和吸引独立行医的医疗保健提供者,以改善公共卫生紧急情况下与所有医疗保健提供者的沟通。

相似文献

1
Variations in Healthcare Provider Use of Public Health and Other Information Sources by Provider Type and Practice Setting During New York City's Response to the Emerging Threat of Zika Virus Disease, 2016.2016 年纽约市应对寨卡病毒病新兴威胁期间,不同类型医疗服务提供者和不同医疗环境下利用公共卫生和其他信息资源的情况。
Health Secur. 2018 Jul/Aug;16(4):252-261. doi: 10.1089/hs.2018.0026.
2
Zika Virus Preparedness and Response Efforts Through the Collaboration Between a Health Care Delivery System and a Local Public Health Department.通过医疗服务提供系统与当地公共卫生部门的合作开展寨卡病毒防范与应对工作。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2018 Dec;12(6):689-691. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2018.5. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
3
Using a call center to coordinate Zika virus testing-New York City, 2016.2016年纽约市利用呼叫中心协调寨卡病毒检测工作
J Emerg Manag. 2016 Nov/Dec;14(6):391-395. doi: 10.5055/jem.2016.0303.
4
A survey-based study of Zika virus communication preferences among pregnant women in Georgia, United States.一项基于调查的研究,探讨了美国佐治亚州孕妇对寨卡病毒传播偏好的看法。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 26;17(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1516-0.
5
Suspected Female-to-Male Sexual Transmission of Zika Virus - New York City, 2016.2016 年纽约市疑似寨卡病毒经性传播致男传女。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Jul 22;65(28):716-7. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6528e2.
6
Zika Virus Surveillance and Preparedness - New York City, 2015-2016.寨卡病毒监测与防范——纽约市,2015 - 2016年
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Jun 24;65(24):629-635. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6524e3.
7
Disparities in Zika Virus Testing and Incidence Among Women of Reproductive Age-New York City, 2016.《2016 年纽约市育龄妇女寨卡病毒检测和发病率的差异》
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 Nov/Dec;24(6):533-541. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000684.
8
Preparedness for Zika Virus Disease - New York City, 2016.寨卡病毒病准备情况 - 纽约市,2016 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Oct 28;65(42):1161-1165. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6542a2.
9
Evolution of Knowledge, Awareness, and Practices regarding Zika Virus from 2016 to 2017.2016年至2017年期间关于寨卡病毒的知识、认知及实践的演变
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2017;2017:6350602. doi: 10.1155/2017/6350602. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
10
How the US Population Engaged with and Prioritized Sources of Information about the Emerging Zika Virus in 2016.2016 年美国民众如何关注并优先选择有关寨卡病毒新出现的信息来源。
Health Secur. 2018 May/Jun;16(3):165-177. doi: 10.1089/hs.2017.0107.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge exchange in crisis settings: A scoping review.危机环境下的知识交流:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0282080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282080. eCollection 2023.
2
Communicating the risk of contracting Zika virus to low income underserved pregnant Latinas: A clinic-based study.向收入较低、服务不足的拉丁裔孕妇传播感染寨卡病毒的风险:一项基于诊所的研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 20;15(11):e0241675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241675. eCollection 2020.
3
On the front line: Health professionals and system preparedness for Zika virus in Peru.
在前线:秘鲁卫生专业人员和系统对寨卡病毒的准备情况。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Jan;148 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):45-54. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13047.