• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后破裂风险和破裂预防再干预。

Predicting risk of rupture and rupture-preventing reinterventions following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2018 Sep;105(10):1294-1304. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10964.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.10964
PMID:30133767
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6175165/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical and imaging surveillance practices following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) vary considerably and compliance with recommended lifelong surveillance is poor. The aim of this study was to develop a dynamic prognostic model to enable stratification of patients at risk of future secondary aortic rupture or the need for intervention to prevent rupture (rupture-preventing reintervention) to enable the development of personalized surveillance intervals.

METHODS

Baseline data and repeat measurements of postoperative aneurysm sac diameter from the EVAR-1 and EVAR-2 trials were used to develop the model, with external validation in a cohort from a single-centre vascular database. Longitudinal mixed-effects models were fitted to trajectories of sac diameter, and model-predicted sac diameter and rate of growth were used in prognostic Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Some 785 patients from the EVAR trials were included, of whom 155 (19·7 per cent) experienced at least one rupture or required a rupture-preventing reintervention during follow-up. An increased risk was associated with preoperative AAA size, rate of sac growth and the number of previously detected complications. A prognostic model using predicted sac growth alone had good discrimination at 2 years (C-index 0·68), 3 years (C-index 0·72) and 5 years (C-index 0·75) after operation and had excellent external validation (C-index 0·76-0·79). More than 5 years after operation, growth rates above 1 mm/year had a sensitivity of over 80 per cent and specificity over 50 per cent in identifying events occurring within 2 years.

CONCLUSION

Secondary sac growth is an important predictor of rupture or rupture-preventing reintervention to enable the development of personalized surveillance intervals. A dynamic prognostic model has the potential to tailor surveillance by identifying a large proportion of patients who may require less intensive follow-up.

摘要

背景

血管内腹主动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)后对完整的腹主动脉瘤(AAA)进行临床和影像学监测的实践差异很大,并且对推荐的终身监测的依从性很差。本研究的目的是开发一种动态预后模型,以对未来发生二次主动脉破裂或需要进行干预以预防破裂(破裂预防再干预)的风险患者进行分层,从而制定个性化的监测间隔。

方法

使用 EVAR-1 和 EVAR-2 试验的术后动脉瘤囊直径的基线数据和重复测量值来开发模型,并在单中心血管数据库的队列中进行外部验证。使用纵向混合效应模型拟合囊直径的轨迹,使用模型预测的囊直径和生长速度来进行预后 Cox 比例风险模型。

结果

EVAR 试验共纳入 785 例患者,其中 155 例(19.7%)在随访期间至少经历过一次破裂或需要进行破裂预防再干预。术前 AAA 大小、囊生长速度和先前检测到的并发症数量与风险增加相关。仅使用预测的囊生长构建的预后模型在术后 2 年(C 指数 0.68)、3 年(C 指数 0.72)和 5 年(C 指数 0.75)时具有良好的区分能力,并且具有出色的外部验证(C 指数 0.76-0.79)。术后 5 年以上,生长速度超过 1mm/年时,在识别 2 年内发生的事件时,敏感性超过 80%,特异性超过 50%。

结论

二次囊生长是破裂或破裂预防再干预的重要预测指标,可用于制定个性化的监测间隔。动态预后模型有可能通过识别需要较少密集随访的患者的很大一部分,从而对监测进行定制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c703/6175165/ae147e0ba7d7/BJS-105-1294-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c703/6175165/ab32774a2282/BJS-105-1294-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c703/6175165/ae147e0ba7d7/BJS-105-1294-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c703/6175165/ab32774a2282/BJS-105-1294-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c703/6175165/ae147e0ba7d7/BJS-105-1294-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting risk of rupture and rupture-preventing reinterventions following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.预测腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后破裂风险和破裂预防再干预。
Br J Surg. 2018 Sep;105(10):1294-1304. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10964.
2
Longer follow-up intervals following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair are safe and appropriate after marked aneurysm sac regression.在腹主动脉瘤修复后,明显的瘤囊回缩后,延长随访间隔是安全且合适的。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Aug;76(2):454-460. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.01.079. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
3
Early and delayed rupture after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a 10-year multicenter registry.一项为期10年的多中心登记研究中腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后的早期和延迟破裂情况
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Nov;60(5):1146-1153. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.046. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
4
Duplex Ultrasound-Only Surveillance after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair is Associated with Favorable Long-Term Outcomes.单纯采用双层超声进行腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后的随访与长期良好结局相关。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Nov;108:112-126. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.05.008. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
5
Aortic rupture and sac expansion after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术后的主动脉破裂和瘤囊扩张。
Br J Surg. 2012 Dec;99(12):1657-64. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8938. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
6
Aneurysm sac failure to regress after endovascular aneurysm repair is associated with lower long-term survival.血管内动脉瘤修复后瘤囊未退缩与长期生存率降低有关。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Feb;69(2):414-422. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.04.050. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
7
Aneurysm sac expansion is independently associated with late mortality in patients treated with endovascular aneurysm repair.动脉瘤囊体扩张与血管内动脉瘤修复治疗患者的晚期死亡率独立相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;67(1):157-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.06.075. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
8
Late outcomes after endovascular and open repair of large abdominal aortic aneurysms.大型腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术和开放修复术后的远期疗效
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;74(4):1152-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.02.024. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
9
Fourteen-year outcomes of abdominal aortic endovascular repair with the Zenith stent graft.使用Zenith覆膜支架进行腹主动脉腔内修复的14年随访结果
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Feb;65(2):318-329. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.07.117. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
10
Association between diabetes status and long-term outcomes following open and endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.糖尿病状况与内脏动脉瘤开放和血管内修复术后长期结局的关系。
J Vasc Surg. 2024 Dec;80(6):1685-1696.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.030. Epub 2024 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Late post-EVAR abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture: a meta-analysis study.腔内修复术后晚期腹主动脉瘤破裂:一项荟萃分析研究
Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis. 2024 Jul 26;9:e152-e164. doi: 10.5114/amsad/190421. eCollection 2024.
2
Implantable Pressure-Sensing Devices for Monitoring Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Post-Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.用于监测血管内动脉瘤修复术后腹主动脉瘤的植入式压力感应装置。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 30;24(11):3526. doi: 10.3390/s24113526.
3
Design and Characterisation of a Read-Out System for Wireless Monitoring of a Novel Implantable Sensor for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Monitoring.

本文引用的文献

1
'Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator' mobile applications (Apps): a systematic review and scoring using the validated user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS).'前列腺癌风险计算器' 移动应用程序 (Apps):使用经过验证的移动应用程序评级量表 (uMARS) 的用户版本进行的系统评价和评分。
World J Urol. 2018 Apr;36(4):565-573. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2150-1. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
2
Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Patients Physically Ineligible for Open Repair: Very Long-term Follow-up in the EVAR-2 Randomized Controlled Trial.血管内修复术治疗身体状况不适合开放修复的腹主动脉瘤患者:EVAR-2 随机对照试验的极长期随访结果。
Ann Surg. 2017 Nov;266(5):713-719. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002392.
3
用于无线监测新型植入式腹主动脉瘤监测传感器的读出系统的设计与特性评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 May 17;24(10):3195. doi: 10.3390/s24103195.
4
Modelling the impact of changes to abdominal aortic aneurysm screening and treatment services in England during the COVID-19 pandemic.模拟 COVID-19 大流行期间英格兰腹主动脉瘤筛查和治疗服务变化的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 15;16(6):e0253327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253327. eCollection 2021.
5
Endovascular and Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.血管内和开放修复腹主动脉瘤。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Oct 20;117(48):813-819. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0813.
6
Harnessing repeated measurements of predictor variables for clinical risk prediction: a review of existing methods.利用预测变量的重复测量进行临床风险预测:现有方法综述
Diagn Progn Res. 2020 Jul 9;4:9. doi: 10.1186/s41512-020-00078-z. eCollection 2020.
7
Associations of Bariatric Interventions With Micronutrient and Endocrine Disturbances.减重干预与微量营养素和内分泌紊乱的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e205123. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5123.
8
Expression Patterns of Circulating MicroRNAs in the Risk Stratification of Bicuspid Aortopathy.循环微小RNA在二叶式主动脉病变风险分层中的表达模式
J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 19;9(1):276. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010276.
9
Abdominal aortic aneurysm in prostate cancer patients: the "road map" from incidental detection to advanced predictive, preventive, and personalized approach utilizing common follow-up for both pathologies.前列腺癌患者的腹主动脉瘤:从偶然发现到利用两种病症的共同随访进行高级预测、预防和个性化治疗的“路线图”。
EPMA J. 2019 Nov 26;10(4):415-423. doi: 10.1007/s13167-019-00193-y. eCollection 2019 Dec.
10
Five-year reintervention after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative.血管质量倡议中的血管内腹主动脉瘤修复后 5 年再干预。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Mar;71(3):799-805.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.05.057. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
Duplex Ultrasound Surveillance After Uncomplicated Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.
单纯腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术后的双功超声监测
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2017 Jul;51(5):295-300. doi: 10.1177/1538574417708131. Epub 2017 May 23.
4
Meta-analysis of individual-patient data from EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE trials comparing outcomes of endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm over 5 years.对来自EVAR-1、DREAM、OVER和ACE试验的个体患者数据进行荟萃分析,比较腹主动脉瘤血管内修复或开放修复5年的结果。
Br J Surg. 2017 Feb;104(3):166-178. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10430.
5
Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years' follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial.英国血管内动脉瘤修复试验 1(EVAR 试验 1)15 年随访的血管内与开放修复腹主动脉瘤的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 12;388(10058):2366-2374. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31135-7. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
6
Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement.透明报告个体预后或诊断的多变量预测模型(TRIPOD):TRIPOD 声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):55-63. doi: 10.7326/M14-0697.
7
Follow-up compliance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人的腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术后的随访依从性。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jan;61(1):16-22.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
8
Long-term cost-effectiveness analysis of endovascular versus open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm based on four randomized clinical trials.基于四项随机临床试验的腹主动脉瘤腔内修复与开放修复的长期成本效益分析。
Br J Surg. 2014 May;101(6):623-31. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9464. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
9
Predicting aortic complications after endovascular aneurysm repair.预测血管内动脉瘤修复术后的主动脉并发症。
Br J Surg. 2013 Sep;100(10):1302-11. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9177. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
10
Long-term comparison of endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.血管内与开放修复腹主动脉瘤的长期比较。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 22;367(21):1988-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1207481.