German Paediatric Pain Centre, Children's and Adolescents' Hospital Datteln, Department of Children's Pain Therapy and Paediatric Palliative Care, Witten/Herdecke University, Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten, Germany.
Clin J Pain. 2018 Dec;34(12):1173-1179. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000646.
The assessment of pain-related disability in pediatric chronic pain patients plays an important role in research on the effectiveness of pain treatment. The present study aimed to compare the 2 available measures of pain-related disability in the German language, the Functional Disability Inventory (FDI) and Pediatric Pain Disability Index (PPDI), in terms of psychometric properties and convergent validity. In addition, associations between FDI/PPDI scores and sex, age, and pain locations were investigated.
Data of N=250 pediatric pain patients (Mage=14.4, SD=1.8) were collected at the patients' initial presentation to a specialized pediatric pain center.
The results revealed similarly sound psychometric properties in terms of model fit, item difficulties, corrected item-total correlations, and missing values for both measures. However, item difficulties for the FDI were rather low. Both measures displayed good convergent validity in terms of associations with pain intensity, pain-related school absence, and emotional functioning (anxiety, depression). In both measures, girls had significantly higher scores than boys. No associations were found between the FDI/PPDI total scores and age or pain location.
In conclusion, both measures are equally suited to assess pain-related disability in adolescents with chronic pain. The FDI should be used with caution in epidemiological studies due to the risk of floor effects. Further research is needed with regard to the relationship between pain-related disability and sex.
在慢性疼痛患儿的疼痛治疗效果研究中,疼痛相关残疾的评估起着重要作用。本研究旨在比较德国语版的两种疼痛相关残疾评估工具,即功能障碍量表(FDI)和儿童疼痛残疾指数(PPDI),在心理测量特性和聚合效度方面的差异。此外,还调查了 FDI/PPDI 评分与性别、年龄和疼痛部位之间的相关性。
本研究共纳入了 250 名儿科慢性疼痛患者(平均年龄=14.4,标准差=1.8),数据来自他们首次就诊于专门的儿科疼痛中心时的资料。
结果表明,这两种测量工具在模型拟合、项目难度、校正项目总分相关和缺失值方面具有相似的良好心理测量特性。然而,FDI 的项目难度相对较低。这两种测量工具在与疼痛强度、与疼痛相关的缺课情况以及情绪功能(焦虑、抑郁)的相关性方面均显示出良好的聚合效度。在这两种测量工具中,女孩的得分均显著高于男孩。FDI/PPDI 总分与年龄或疼痛部位之间无相关性。
总之,这两种测量工具在评估青少年慢性疼痛患者的疼痛相关残疾方面同样适用。在流行病学研究中,由于存在地板效应的风险,FDI 的使用应谨慎。还需要进一步研究疼痛相关残疾与性别之间的关系。