Department of Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital of Birmingham NHS trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;46(12):1969-1976. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003392.
In various medical and surgical conditions, research has found that centers with higher patient volumes have better outcomes. This relationship has not previously been explored for status epilepticus. This study sought to examine whether centers that see higher volumes of patients with status epilepticus have lower in-hospital mortality than low-volume centers.
Cohort study, using 2010-2015 data from the nationwide Case Mix Programme database of the U.K.'s Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre.
Greater than 90% of ICUs in United Kingdom, Wales, and Northern Ireland.
Twenty-thousand nine-hundred twenty-two adult critical care admissions with a primary or secondary diagnosis of status epilepticus or prolonged seizure.
Annual hospital status epilepticus admission volume.
We used multiple logistic regression to evaluate the association between hospital annual status epilepticus admission volume and in-hospital mortality. Hospital volume was modeled as a nonlinear variable using restricted cubic splines, and generalized estimating equations with robust SEs were used to account for clustering by institution. There were 2,462 in-hospital deaths (11.8%). There was no significant association between treatment volume and in-hospital mortality for status epilepticus (p = 0.54). This conclusion was unchanged across a number of subgroup and sensitivity analyses, although we lacked data on seizure duration and medication use. Secondary analyses suggest that many high-risk patients were already transferred from low- to high-volume centers.
We find no evidence that higher volume centers are associated with lower mortality in status epilepticus overall. It is likely that national guidelines and local pathways in the United Kingdom allow efficient patient transfer from smaller centers like district general hospitals to provide satisfactory patient care in status epilepticus. Future research using more granular data should explore this association for the subgroup of patients with refractory and superrefractory status epilepticus.
在各种医学和外科条件下,研究发现患者量较高的中心具有更好的结果。这种关系以前并未在癫痫持续状态中进行过探讨。本研究旨在检查癫痫持续状态患者量较高的中心是否比低量中心的院内死亡率更低。
使用英国重症监护国家审计和研究中心全国病例组合计划数据库 2010-2015 年的数据进行队列研究。
英国、威尔士和北爱尔兰超过 90%的 ICU。
2922 名成人重症监护入院患者,主要或次要诊断为癫痫持续状态或延长性癫痫发作。
医院每年癫痫持续状态入院量。
我们使用多变量逻辑回归来评估医院每年癫痫持续状态入院量与院内死亡率之间的关系。使用限制三次样条对医院容量进行非线性建模,并使用广义估计方程和稳健标准误差来考虑机构聚类。共有 2462 例院内死亡(11.8%)。癫痫持续状态的治疗量与院内死亡率之间没有显著关联(p = 0.54)。这一结论在许多亚组和敏感性分析中仍然不变,尽管我们缺乏关于癫痫发作持续时间和药物使用的数据。二次分析表明,许多高危患者已经从低容量中心转移到高容量中心。
我们没有发现证据表明高容量中心与癫痫持续状态的总体死亡率降低相关。英国的国家指南和当地途径很可能允许从像地区综合医院这样的小中心有效地转移患者,以提供满意的癫痫持续状态患者护理。未来使用更细粒度数据的研究应该探索这种关系对于难治性和超难治性癫痫持续状态患者亚组。