Suppr超能文献

慢性腰痛治疗:阿片类药物与非药物治疗模式对退伍军人的影响。

Treatment of Low Back Pain With Opioids and Nonpharmacologic Treatment Modalities for Army Veterans.

机构信息

Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences Center.

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Epidemiology.

出版信息

Med Care. 2018 Oct;56(10):855-861. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000977.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) there is growing interest in the use of nonpharmacologic treatment (NPT) for low back pain (LBP) as pain intensity and interference do not decrease with opioid use.

OBJECTIVES

To describe overall and facility-level variation in the extent to which specific NPT modalities are used in VHA for LBP, either alone or as adjuncts to opioid medications, and to understand associations between veterans' clinical and demographic characteristics and type of treatment.

RESEARCH DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study examined use of opioids and 21 specific NPT modalities used by veterans.

SUBJECTS

VHA-enrolled Iraq and Afghanistan veterans who utilized care in ("linked" to) 130 VHA facilities within 12 months after their separation from the Army between fiscal years 2008-2011, and who were diagnosed with LBP within 12 months after linkage (n=49,885).

MEASURES

Measures included per patient: days' supply of opioids, number of visits for NPT modalities, and pain scores within one year after a LBP diagnosis.

RESULTS

Thirty-four percent of veterans filled a prescription for opioids, 35% utilized at least 1 NPT modality, and 15% used both within the same year. Most patients with LBP receiving NPT, on average, had moderate pain (36%), followed by low pain (27%), severe pain (15%), and no pain (11%). Eleven percent had no pain scores recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

About 65% of VHA patients with a LBP diagnosis did not receive NPT, and about 43% of NPT users also were prescribed an opioid. Understanding utilization patterns and their relationship with patient characteristics can guide pain management decisions and future study.

摘要

背景

在退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)中,越来越关注使用非药物治疗(NPT)治疗下腰痛(LBP),因为阿片类药物的使用并不能降低疼痛强度和干扰。

目的

描述 VHA 中单独使用或作为阿片类药物辅助治疗时,特定 NPT 方式用于 LBP 的总体和设施水平差异,并了解退伍军人的临床和人口统计学特征与治疗类型之间的关联。

研究设计

这项回顾性队列研究检查了退伍军人使用阿片类药物和 21 种特定 NPT 方式的情况。

受试者

在财政年度 2008-2011 年期间,从军队分离后 12 个月内在 130 家 VHA 设施中接受治疗(“关联”)的 VHA 登记的伊拉克和阿富汗退伍军人,并且在关联后 12 个月内被诊断为 LBP(n=49885)。

测量

包括每位患者的测量:阿片类药物的供应天数、NPT 方式的就诊次数和 LBP 诊断后一年内的疼痛评分。

结果

34%的退伍军人开了阿片类药物处方,35%的退伍军人至少使用了 1 种 NPT 方式,15%的退伍军人在同一年内同时使用了这两种方式。接受 NPT 的 LBP 患者中,大多数平均有中度疼痛(36%),其次是轻度疼痛(27%)、重度疼痛(15%)和无疼痛(11%)。11%的患者没有记录疼痛评分。

结论

大约 65%的 VHA 腰痛诊断患者未接受 NPT,约 43%的 NPT 用户也开了阿片类药物处方。了解利用模式及其与患者特征的关系,可以指导疼痛管理决策和未来的研究。

相似文献

8
Associations of Early Treatments for Low-Back Pain with Military Readiness Outcomes.腰痛早期治疗与军事准备结果的关联。
J Altern Complement Med. 2018 Jul;24(7):666-676. doi: 10.1089/acm.2017.0290. Epub 2018 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验