• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高强度功能性训练期间用于量化训练负荷的会话主观用力程度(Session-RPE)方法的有效性、可靠性及应用

Validity, Reliability, and Application of the Session-RPE Method for Quantifying Training Loads during High Intensity Functional Training.

作者信息

Crawford Derek A, Drake Nicholas B, Carper Michael J, DeBlauw Justin, Heinrich Katie M

机构信息

Department of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, Pittsburg State University, Pittsburg, KS 66763, USA.

Functional Intensity Training Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.

出版信息

Sports (Basel). 2018 Aug 21;6(3):84. doi: 10.3390/sports6030084.

DOI:10.3390/sports6030084
PMID:30134535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6162783/
Abstract

The session rate of perceived exertion method (sRPE) has often been utilized in sports activities in which quantification of external training loads is challenging. The multi-modal, constantly varied nature of high intensity functional training (HIFT) represents a significant hurdle to calculate external work and the sRPE method may provide an elegant solution to this problem. However, no studies have investigated the psychometric properties of sRPE within HIFT interventions. Twenty-five healthy men and women participated in six weeks of HIFT. Rate of perceived exertion and heart rate were assessed within every training session throughout the duration of the intervention. Compared to criterion heart rate-based measures, we observed sRPE method is a valid tool across individual, group, and sex levels. However, poor reliability in participants' abilities to correctly match rate of perceived exertion with the relative level of physiologic effort (i.e., percentile of maximum heart rate) currently limits the utility of this strategy within HIFT. When applied, the validity and reliability of the sRPE seem to improve over time, and future research should continue to explore the potential of this monitoring strategy within HIFT interventions.

摘要

自感用力度法(sRPE)常用于外部训练负荷量化具有挑战性的体育活动中。高强度功能性训练(HIFT)具有多模式、不断变化的特点,这给计算外部工作量带来了重大障碍,而sRPE方法可能为解决这一问题提供一个简洁的方案。然而,尚无研究调查过sRPE在HIFT干预中的心理测量特性。25名健康男性和女性参与了为期六周的HIFT。在整个干预期间,每次训练课都对自感用力度和心率进行评估。与基于标准心率的测量方法相比,我们观察到sRPE方法在个体、群体和性别层面都是一种有效的工具。然而,参与者将自感用力度与生理努力相对水平(即最大心率百分比)正确匹配的能力可靠性较差,这目前限制了该策略在HIFT中的应用。应用时,sRPE的有效性和可靠性似乎会随着时间的推移而提高,未来的研究应继续探索这种监测策略在HIFT干预中的潜力。

相似文献

1
Validity, Reliability, and Application of the Session-RPE Method for Quantifying Training Loads during High Intensity Functional Training.高强度功能性训练期间用于量化训练负荷的会话主观用力程度(Session-RPE)方法的有效性、可靠性及应用
Sports (Basel). 2018 Aug 21;6(3):84. doi: 10.3390/sports6030084.
2
Validity and reliability of the session-RPE method for quantifying training in Australian football: a comparison of the CR10 and CR100 scales.用于量化澳大利亚足球训练的赛中 RPE 方法的有效性和可靠性:CR10 和 CR100 量表的比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Jan;27(1):270-6. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182541d2e.
3
Validity of Session Rating Perceived Exertion Method for Quantifying Internal Training Load during High-Intensity Functional Training.高强度功能性训练期间用于量化内部训练负荷的会话感知用力评分法的有效性
Sports (Basel). 2018 Jul 23;6(3):68. doi: 10.3390/sports6030068.
4
A detailed quantification of differential ratings of perceived exertion during team-sport training.团队运动训练期间感知运动用力差异评分的详细量化。
J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Mar;20(3):290-295. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
5
Validity of Session-Rate of Perceived Exertion to Quantify Training Loads in Paralympic Swimmers.残奥会游泳运动员训练负荷量化的感知用力会话率的有效性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Sep 1;35(9):2611-2615. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003181.
6
The Relationships Between Internal and External Measures of Training Load and Intensity in Team Sports: A Meta-Analysis.团队运动中训练负荷和强度的内部和外部测量之间的关系:一项荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2018 Mar;48(3):641-658. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0830-z.
7
Validity and reliability of the session-RPE method for quantifying training load in karate athletes.用于量化空手道运动员训练负荷的训练会话主观用力程度(session-RPE)方法的有效性和可靠性。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2015 Apr 24.
8
Quantifying Training Loads in Contemporary Dance.量化当代舞蹈中的训练负荷
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017 Jul;12(6):796-802. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0159. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
9
Establishing the criterion validity and reliability of common methods for quantifying training load.确定量化训练负荷常用方法的效标效度和信度。
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Aug;28(8):2330-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000416.
10
Validity of Session Rating of Perceived Exertion for Measuring Training Load in Youth Team Handball Players.《主观疲劳感知评估在青少年手球运动员训练负荷测量中的有效性》。
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Jan 1;37(1):174-180. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004202. Epub 2021 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of an Acute High Dose of Caffeine on Physiological Responses and Performance During a Strength-Focused CrossFit Workout: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study.急性高剂量咖啡因对以力量为主的CrossFit训练期间生理反应和运动表现的影响:一项随机、双盲、交叉研究。
Nutrients. 2025 Apr 23;17(9):1419. doi: 10.3390/nu17091419.
2
Differences in Workloads of Maximal Tasks in Active-Duty Firefighters.现役消防员最大任务工作量的差异。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jul 27;12(15):1495. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12151495.
3
Solving the High-Intensity Multimodal Training Prescription Puzzle: A Systematic Mapping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of CrossFit-Related Spinal Injuries.CrossFit 相关脊柱损伤的影响。
Clin J Sport Med. 2019 Nov;29(6):482-485. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000553.
2
Are Changes in Physical Work Capacity Induced by High-Intensity Functional Training Related to Changes in Associated Physiologic Measures?高强度功能训练引起的身体工作能力变化与相关生理指标的变化有关吗?
Sports (Basel). 2018 Mar 27;6(2):26. doi: 10.3390/sports6020026.
3
Session-RPE Method for Training Load Monitoring: Validity, Ecological Usefulness, and Influencing Factors.
解决高强度多模式训练处方难题:一项系统映射综述
Sports Med Open. 2024 Jul 23;10(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00747-z.
4
The dose-dependent effect of caffeine supplementation on performance, reaction time and postural stability in CrossFit - a randomized placebo-controlled crossover trial.咖啡因补充对 CrossFit 中表现、反应时间和姿势稳定性的剂量依赖性影响:一项随机安慰剂对照交叉试验。
J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2024 Dec;21(1):2301384. doi: 10.1080/15502783.2023.2301384. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
5
Supplementation of caffeine and sodium bicarbonate together could not improve performance and performance-related factors in CrossFit participants: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.补充咖啡因和碳酸氢钠一起不能提高 CrossFit 参与者的表现和表现相关因素:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2023 Dec;20(1):2206390. doi: 10.1080/15502783.2023.2206390.
6
The Effects of a Single Session of High Intensity Functional Training on Energy Expenditure, VO, and Blood Lactate.单次高强度功能性训练对能量消耗、摄氧量和血乳酸的影响。
J Sports Sci Med. 2022 Dec 1;21(4):545-554. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2022.547. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Quantifying CrossFit: Potential solutions for monitoring multimodal workloads and identifying training targets.量化CrossFit:监测多模式工作量和确定训练目标的潜在解决方案。
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Oct 14;4:949429. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.949429. eCollection 2022.
8
The effects of high-intensity functional training on cardiometabolic risk factors and exercise enjoyment in men and women with metabolic syndrome: study protocol for a randomized, 12-week, dose-response trial.高强度功能性训练对代谢综合征男性和女性患者的心血代谢风险因素和运动愉悦感的影响:一项随机、12 周、剂量反应试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Mar 1;23(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06100-7.
9
Time-course effects of functional fitness sessions performed at different intensities on the metabolic, hormonal, and BDNF responses in trained men.不同强度的功能性健身训练对训练有素男性的代谢、激素和脑源性神经营养因子反应的时间进程效应。
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022 Feb 8;14(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13102-022-00412-6.
10
High-Intensity Functional Training Guided by Individualized Heart Rate Variability Results in Similar Health and Fitness Improvements as Predetermined Training with Less Effort.由个性化心率变异性指导的高强度功能训练在健康和健身改善方面与预定训练效果相似,但所需努力更少。
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2021 Dec 13;6(4):102. doi: 10.3390/jfmk6040102.
用于训练负荷监测的会话主观用力程度(Session-RPE)方法:有效性、生态学效度及影响因素
Front Neurosci. 2017 Nov 2;11:612. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00612. eCollection 2017.
4
That Escalated Quickly-Planning to Ignore RPE Can Backfire.事情迅速升级——计划忽略主观用力程度分级(RPE)可能会适得其反。
Front Physiol. 2017 Sep 22;8:736. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00736. eCollection 2017.
5
"Numb-Leg" in a CrossFit Athlete: A Case Presentation.一名CrossFit运动员的“腿部麻木”:病例报告
PM R. 2017 Aug;9(8):834-836. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
6
Retrospective Injury Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Injury in CrossFit.CrossFit运动损伤的回顾性流行病学及危险因素
J Sports Sci Med. 2017 Mar 1;16(1):53-59. eCollection 2017 Mar.
7
Rates and risk factors of injury in CrossFitTM: a prospective cohort study.CrossFitTM运动中的损伤发生率及危险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017 Sep;57(9):1147-1153. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06827-4. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
8
Society of Skeletal Radiology 39th Annual Meeting March 13-16, 2016.骨骼放射学会第39届年会,2016年3月13日至16日。
Skeletal Radiol. 2016 Aug;45(8):1149-72. doi: 10.1007/s00256-016-2415-6.
9
Perceived demands and postexercise physical dysfunction in CrossFit® compared to an ACSM based training session.与基于美国运动医学学会(ACSM)的训练课程相比,CrossFit®训练中的感知需求和运动后身体功能障碍。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017 May;57(5):604-609. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06243-5. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
10
Monitoring the athlete training response: subjective self-reported measures trump commonly used objective measures: a systematic review.监测运动员的训练反应:主观自我报告测量优于常用的客观测量:一项系统综述
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Mar;50(5):281-91. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094758. Epub 2015 Sep 9.