Suppr超能文献

手持式测力计测量老年人坐姿髋关节伸肌力量的可靠性和有效性。

Reliability and Validity of Seated Hip Extensor Strength Measurement by Handheld Dynamometer in Older Adults.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Hokkaido Chitose College of Rehabilitation, Chitose, Japan.

Department of Public Health, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.

出版信息

J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2019 Oct/Dec;42(4):E39-E44. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000207.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Muscle strength measurements with the handheld dynamometer are sometimes performed according to manual muscle testing. However, measuring hip extensor muscle strength in the prone position is difficult, since the some older adults have kyphosis or flexion contracture of the lower limbs. Alternatively, there is the standing position method of manual muscle testing, which accomodates those malalignments; however, it is known that the muscle strength of the lower limb that is not measured affects the measurement result. Hence, we devised the hip extensor strength measurement in a sitting position for healthy males in previous studies. This study examined the reliability and validity of the sitting measurement by a handheld dynamometer in older adults.

METHODS

Participants were 40 older adults (age [SD] = 82.4 [4.3] years). Measurements of isometric hip extensor muscle strength using a handheld dynamometer in 3 positions (sitting, standing, and prone) were conducted twice. A surface electromyogram was used to measure the activity of the gluteus maximus and the semitendinosus muscles. The reliability of muscle strength in each posture was examined with Cronbach α coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs1,1), and Bland-Altman analysis. The concurrent validity of muscle strength for the sitting and standing positions with reference to the prone position was examined with Spearman rank correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. Furthermore, muscle strength and muscle activity were compared between each posture.

RESULTS

The Cronbach α coefficient was 0.75. For each posture, the ICC1,1 was 0.86 to 0.87, with no systematic error in the sitting and prone positions. The sitting and standing positions were significantly associated with the prone position (rs = 0.72 and 0.42), with no systematic error between the sitting and prone positions. Proportional error was demonstrated between the standing and prone positions (P < .01). There was no significant difference in muscle strength between any posture. Gluteus maximus muscle activity was significantly higher in the sitting versus standing position (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The measurement of hip extensor muscle strength in the sitting position is a reliable and valid method in older adults, which can be effective even when the prone position is not possible.

摘要

背景与目的

使用手持测力计进行肌肉力量测量有时是根据手动肌肉测试进行的。然而,在俯卧位测量髋关节伸肌力量是困难的,因为一些老年人有脊柱后凸或下肢屈曲挛缩。或者,可以使用手动肌肉测试的站立位方法,该方法适应这些错位;然而,已知未测量的下肢肌肉力量会影响测量结果。因此,我们在之前的研究中为健康男性设计了坐姿髋关节伸肌力量测量方法。本研究检验了在老年人中使用手持测力计进行坐姿测量的可靠性和有效性。

方法

参与者为 40 名老年人(年龄[标准差] = 82.4[4.3]岁)。使用手持测力计在 3 种姿势(坐姿、站立和俯卧)下进行等长髋关节伸肌肌肉力量测量,共进行 2 次。使用表面肌电图测量臀大肌和半腱肌的活动。使用 Cronbach α 系数、组内相关系数(ICC1,1)和 Bland-Altman 分析评估每个姿势的肌肉力量可靠性。使用 Spearman 秩相关和 Bland-Altman 分析检验坐姿和站立位与俯卧位的肌肉力量的同时效度。此外,还比较了每个姿势的肌肉力量和肌肉活动。

结果

Cronbach α 系数为 0.75。对于每个姿势,ICC1,1 为 0.86 至 0.87,且在坐姿和俯卧位中没有系统误差。坐姿和站立位与俯卧位显著相关(rs = 0.72 和 0.42),且在坐姿和俯卧位之间没有系统误差。在站立位和俯卧位之间存在比例误差(P <.01)。在任何姿势之间,肌肉力量均无显著差异。与站立位相比,坐姿时臀大肌的肌肉活动明显更高(P <.05)。

结论

在老年人中,坐姿髋关节伸肌力量测量是一种可靠且有效的方法,即使无法进行俯卧位测量,也可以有效进行。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验