Suppr超能文献

协同抑郁症治疗对糖尿病风险的影响:IMPACT 随机对照试验的 9 年随访。

Effect of collaborative depression treatment on risk for diabetes: A 9-year follow-up of the IMPACT randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.

Indiana University Center for Aging Research and Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Aug 23;13(8):e0200248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200248. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Considerable epidemiologic evidence and plausible biobehavioral mechanisms suggest that depression is an independent risk factor for diabetes. Moreover, reducing the elevated diabetes risk of depressed individuals is imperative given that both conditions are leading causes of death and disability. However, because no prior study has examined clinical diabetes outcomes among depressed patients at risk for diabetes, the question of whether depression treatment prevents or delays diabetes onset remains unanswered. Accordingly, we examined the effect of a 12-month collaborative care program for late-life depression on 9-year diabetes incidence among depressed, older adults initially free of diabetes. Participants were 119 primary care patients [M (SD) age: 67.2 (6.9) years, 41% African American] with a depressive disorder but without diabetes enrolled at the Indiana sites of the Improving Mood-Promoting Access to Collaborative Treatment (IMPACT) trial. Incident diabetes cases were defined as diabetes diagnoses, positive laboratory values, or diabetes medication prescription, and were identified using electronic medical record and Medicare/Medicaid data. Surprisingly, the rate of incident diabetes in the collaborative care group was 37% (22/59) versus 28% (17/60) in the usual care group. Even though the collaborative care group exhibited greater reductions in depressive symptom severity (p = .024), unadjusted (HR = 1.29, 95% CI: 0.69-2.43, p = .428) and adjusted (HR = 1.18, 95% CI: 0.61-2.29, p = .616) Cox proportional hazards models indicated that the risk of incident diabetes did not differ between the treatment groups. Our novel preliminary findings raise the possibility that depression treatment alone may be insufficient to reduce the excess diabetes risk of depressed, older adults.

摘要

大量的流行病学证据和合理的生物行为学机制表明,抑郁是糖尿病的一个独立危险因素。此外,鉴于这两种疾病都是导致死亡和残疾的主要原因,降低抑郁患者的糖尿病患病风险至关重要。然而,由于之前没有研究在患有糖尿病风险的抑郁患者中检查过临床糖尿病结局,因此抑郁治疗是否能预防或延迟糖尿病发病的问题仍未得到解答。因此,我们研究了为期 12 个月的老年期抑郁症协作护理方案对最初无糖尿病的抑郁老年患者 9 年糖尿病发病率的影响。参与者是来自印第安纳州 IMPACT(改善情绪促进协作治疗)试验的 119 名初级保健患者(M[SD]年龄:67.2[6.9]岁,41%为非裔美国人),他们患有抑郁障碍但无糖尿病。新发糖尿病病例定义为糖尿病诊断、阳性实验室值或糖尿病药物处方,通过电子病历和医疗保险/医疗补助数据确定。令人惊讶的是,协作护理组的新发糖尿病发生率为 37%(22/59),而常规护理组为 28%(17/60)。尽管协作护理组的抑郁症状严重程度有更大程度的降低(p=0.024),但未经调整(HR=1.29,95%CI:0.69-2.43,p=0.428)和调整(HR=1.18,95%CI:0.61-2.29,p=0.616)的 Cox 比例风险模型表明,两组之间的新发糖尿病风险无差异。我们的初步研究结果表明,仅进行抑郁治疗可能不足以降低抑郁老年患者的糖尿病患病风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0b5/6107131/1c76eaffa162/pone.0200248.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验