• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少自述青霉素过敏患者氨曲南使用量的倡议:对临床结局和抗生素处方模式的影响。

Initiative to reduce aztreonam use in patients with self-reported penicillin allergy: Effects on clinical outcomes and antibiotic prescribing patterns.

作者信息

Phan Anthony, Allen Bryan, Epps Kevin, Alikhil Maryam, Kamataris Katherine, Tucker Calvin

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, St. Vincent's HealthCare, Jacksonville, FL.

Department of Pharmacy, St. Vincent's HealthCare, Jacksonville, FL

出版信息

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 Sep 1;75(17 Supplement 3):S58-S62. doi: 10.2146/ajhp170400.

DOI:10.2146/ajhp170400
PMID:30139725
Abstract

PURPOSE

Evaluation of the clinical impact of a pharmacist led-penicillin allergy assessment initiative to enhance antibiotic selection is reported.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with a self-reported penicillin allergy (SRPA) at a 529-bed community teaching hospital and compared clinical response rate before and after implementation of a penicillin allergy assessment initiative, consisting of pharmacy staff education and pocket card development. Patients admitted with SRPA who received antibiotics with gram-negative coverage for at least 48 hours were included. The primary outcome was the clinical response rate of penicillin-allergic patients determined preimplementation and postimplementation of the initiative and was based upon improvement in signs and symptoms of infection. Secondary outcomes included antibiotics used, antibiotic durations, length of stay, survival rate, antibiotic discontinuation rate, and infection rate.

RESULTS

A total of 280 patients were reviewed. Clinical response rate improved after implementation of the initiative ( = 0.047). There were significant differences in the type of antibiotics prescribed between the preimplementation group and the postimplementation group: increased cephalosporin use ( < 0.001), decreased aztreonam use ( = 0.017), and lower fluoroquinolone use ( = 0.008). Median length of stay ( = 0.943), in-hospital mortality rate ( = 0.173), and infection rate ( = 0.426) were similar before and after implementation of the initiative.

CONCLUSION

After implementation of an initiative to encourage the use of cephalosporins rather than aztreonam in patients with SRPA, the rate of clinical response and cephalosporin use increased and rates of exposure to aztreonam and fluoroquinolones decreased.

摘要

目的

报告药师主导的青霉素过敏评估倡议对优化抗生素选择的临床影响评估。

方法

对一家拥有529张床位的社区教学医院中自我报告有青霉素过敏(SRPA)的患者进行回顾性分析,并比较实施青霉素过敏评估倡议(包括药学人员培训和制作袖珍卡片)前后的临床反应率。纳入至少接受48小时革兰氏阴性菌覆盖抗生素治疗的SRPA住院患者。主要结局是该倡议实施前和实施后确定的青霉素过敏患者的临床反应率,基于感染体征和症状的改善情况。次要结局包括使用的抗生素、抗生素使用时长、住院时间、生存率、抗生素停用率和感染率。

结果

共纳入280例患者。倡议实施后临床反应率有所提高( = 0.047)。实施前组和实施后组之间开具的抗生素类型存在显著差异:头孢菌素使用增加( < 0.001),氨曲南使用减少( = 0.017),氟喹诺酮使用减少( = 0.008)。倡议实施前后的中位住院时间( = 0.943)、院内死亡率( = 0.173)和感染率( = 0.426)相似。

结论

在实施鼓励SRPA患者使用头孢菌素而非氨曲南的倡议后,临床反应率和头孢菌素使用率增加,氨曲南和氟喹诺酮的暴露率降低。

相似文献

1
Initiative to reduce aztreonam use in patients with self-reported penicillin allergy: Effects on clinical outcomes and antibiotic prescribing patterns.减少自述青霉素过敏患者氨曲南使用量的倡议:对临床结局和抗生素处方模式的影响。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 Sep 1;75(17 Supplement 3):S58-S62. doi: 10.2146/ajhp170400.
2
A multidimensional antimicrobial stewardship intervention targeting aztreonam use in patients with a reported penicillin allergy.一项针对报告有青霉素过敏的患者使用氨曲南的多维度抗菌药物管理干预措施。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Apr;38(2):213-7. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0248-y. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
3
Implementation of a penicillin allergy screening tool to optimize aztreonam use.实施青霉素过敏筛查工具以优化氨曲南的使用。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016 Mar 1;73(5):298-306. doi: 10.2146/ajhp150288.
4
Impact of a clinical guideline for prescribing antibiotics to inpatients reporting penicillin or cephalosporin allergy.针对报告对青霉素或头孢菌素过敏的住院患者开具抗生素的临床指南的影响。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015 Oct;115(4):294-300.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
5
Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship initiative to evaluate β-lactam allergy in patients ordered aztreonam.一项抗菌药物管理倡议对接受氨曲南治疗患者β-内酰胺类过敏评估的影响
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016 Mar 1;73(5 Suppl 1):S8-13. doi: 10.2146/ajhp150440.
6
Impact of an Inpatient Allergy Guideline on β-Lactam and Alternative Antibiotic Use.住院患者过敏指南对β-内酰胺类药物和替代抗生素使用的影响。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Aug;11(8):2557-2567.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.04.051. Epub 2023 May 12.
7
Pharmacist-driven penicillin skin testing service for adults prescribed nonpreferred antibiotics in a community hospital.社区医院中药师主导的成人青霉素皮试服务,适用于开处非首选抗生素的情况。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Dec 2;76(24):2060-2069. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz237.
8
The Safety of Aztreonam Versus Ceftazidime in Patients Labeled With Penicillin Allergy: A Cohort Study.青霉素过敏患者使用氨曲南与头孢他啶的安全性:一项队列研究。
Clin Ther. 2024 Jun;46(6):463-468. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.05.007. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
9
Penicillin skin testing as an antimicrobial stewardship initiative.青霉素皮肤试验作为一项抗菌药物管理举措。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2017 Feb 15;74(4):232-237. doi: 10.2146/ajhp160233.
10
Impact of a Standardized Beta-Lactam Allergy Questionnaire on Aztreonam Use.标准化β-内酰胺类过敏问卷对氨曲南使用的影响。
J Pharm Pract. 2019 Aug;32(4):399-403. doi: 10.1177/0897190018758557. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Led Penicillin Allergy Assessment Program and Allergy Delabeling in a Tertiary Care Hospital.评价药师主导的青霉素过敏评估计划和在一家三级医院进行的过敏标签去除。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e219820. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.9820.
2
Short and long term impact of combining restrictive and enabling interventions to reduce aztreonam consumption in a community hospital.限制和辅助干预相结合对减少社区医院氨曲南使用的短期和长期影响。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Oct;43(5):1345-1351. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01257-8. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
3
Penicillin Allergy Delabeling: A Multidisciplinary Opportunity.
青霉素过敏标签修正:一个多学科的机会。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Oct;8(9):2858-2868.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.04.059.
4
Strategies for Clarifying Penicillin Allergies When Skin Testing Is Not an Option.皮肤试验不可行时明确青霉素过敏的策略。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2019 Jun 19;7(2):69. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy7020069.
5
Acute care beta-lactam allergy pathways: approaches and outcomes.急性护理β-内酰胺类过敏途径:方法与结果
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 Jul;123(1):16-34. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 19.