Suppr超能文献

评价药师主导的青霉素过敏评估计划和在一家三级医院进行的过敏标签去除。

Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Led Penicillin Allergy Assessment Program and Allergy Delabeling in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e219820. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.9820.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Penicillin allergies are frequently mislabeled, which may contribute to use of less-preferred alternative antibiotics.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a pharmacist-led allergy assessment program's association with antimicrobial use and clinical outcomes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A pharmacist-led allergy assessment program was launched in 2 phases (June 1, 2015, and November 2, 2016) at a single-center tertiary referral hospital. The longitudinal cross-sectional study included all study period adult admissions; hospitalwide outcomes were assessed by segmented regression. Individual outcomes were assessed within an embedded propensity score-matched case-control study of inpatients undergoing comprehensive allergy assessment following self-report of penicillin allergy. Analysis occurred from March 1, 2020, to February 29, 2020.

EXPOSURES

The longitudinal study analyzed hospital-level outcomes over 3 periods: preintervention (15 months), phase 1 (structured allergy history alone, 16 months), and phase 2 (comprehensive assessment including penicillin skin testing, 52 months). The case-control study defined cases as individuals undergoing comprehensive allergy assessment.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Hospital-level outcomes included antibiotic days of therapy per 1000 patient-days and hospital-acquired Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) incidence per 10 000 patient-days. Individual outcomes included antibiotic selection, overall survival, and CDI-free survival.

RESULTS

Longitudinal analysis spanned 2014-2020 (median admissions, 46 416 per year; interquartile range [IQR], 46 001-50 091 per year). Hospitalwide, allergy histories were temporally associated with decreased use of nonpenicillin alternative antibiotics (rate ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.97) and high-CDI-risk antibiotics (rate ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.98). Penicillin skin testing was temporally associated with lower hospital-acquired CDI rates (rate ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43-0.86). The embedded case-control study included 272 cases and 819 controls. Median age was 63 years (interquartile range, 51-73 years), 553 (50.7%) patients were women, and 229 (21.0%) patients were Black. Allergy-assessed patients were less likely to receive high-CDI-risk antibiotics at discharge (odds ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-0.98). Estimated reductions in mortality (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.55-1.07) and hospital-acquired CDI risk (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.18-1.55) were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Pharmacist-led allergy assessments may be associated with reduced high-CDI-risk antibiotic use at both hospitalwide and individual levels. Although individual reductions in mortality and CDI risk did not achieve significance, divergence of survival curves suggest longer-term benefits of allergy delabeling warrant future study.

摘要

重要性

青霉素过敏经常被错误标记,这可能导致使用不太理想的替代抗生素。

目的

评估药师主导的过敏评估计划与抗菌药物使用和临床结果的关系。

设计、地点和参与者:一项药师主导的过敏评估计划分两个阶段(2015 年 6 月 1 日和 2016 年 11 月 2 日)在一家单中心三级转诊医院启动。这项纵向的病例对照研究包括所有研究期间的成年住院患者;通过分段回归评估医院范围的结果。个体结果在一项嵌入式倾向评分匹配的病例对照研究中进行评估,该研究对自我报告青霉素过敏的住院患者进行了全面过敏评估。分析于 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2020 年 2 月 29 日进行。

暴露因素

纵向研究在三个时期分析了医院层面的结果:干预前(15 个月)、第 1 阶段(仅进行结构化过敏史评估,16 个月)和第 2 阶段(进行全面评估,包括青霉素皮试,52 个月)。病例对照研究将接受全面过敏评估的个体定义为病例。

主要结果和测量指标

医院层面的结果包括每 1000 名患者-天的抗生素治疗天数和每 10000 名患者-天的医院获得性艰难梭菌感染(CDI)发生率。个体结果包括抗生素选择、总生存率和 CDI 无复发生存率。

结果

纵向分析跨越了 2014 年至 2020 年(中位数入院人数为每年 46416 人;四分位间距[IQR]为每年 46001 人至 50091 人)。在医院范围内,过敏史与非青霉素替代抗生素的使用减少有关(比率比,0.87;95%CI,0.79-0.97)和高 CDI 风险抗生素(比率比,0.91;95%CI,0.85-0.98)。青霉素皮试与较低的医院获得性 CDI 发生率有关(比率比,0.61;95%CI,0.43-0.86)。嵌入式病例对照研究包括 272 例病例和 819 例对照。中位年龄为 63 岁(IQR,51-73 岁),553 名(50.7%)患者为女性,229 名(21.0%)患者为黑人。接受过敏评估的患者在出院时更不可能使用高 CDI 风险的抗生素(比值比,0.66;95%CI,0.44-0.98)。估计死亡率(风险比,0.77;95%CI,0.55-1.07)和医院获得性 CDI 风险(风险比,0.53;95%CI,0.18-1.55)降低的结果没有统计学意义。

结论和相关性

药师主导的过敏评估可能与医院层面和个体层面的高 CDI 风险抗生素使用减少有关。尽管个体死亡率和 CDI 风险的降低没有达到统计学意义,但生存曲线的差异表明,过敏标记的消除带来的长期获益值得进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d52/8120333/99a39f07c809/jamanetwopen-e219820-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验