Suppr超能文献

基于重量法的技术辅助工作流程系统在危险无菌产品制备中的评估。

Evaluation of a gravimetric-based technology-assisted workflow system on hazardous sterile product preparation.

作者信息

Roberts Patricia A, Willoughby Ian R, Barnes Nathan, Eckel Stephen F, Paruscio Ashley, Valgus John M, Amerine Lindsey B

机构信息

Cleveland Clinic Euclid Hospital, Euclid, OH.

Lifespan Pharmacy, Providence, RI.

出版信息

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 Sep 1;75(17):1286-1292. doi: 10.2146/ajhp170564.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The impact of a gravimetric-based technology-assisted workflow (TAWF) system on hazardous compounded sterile product (CSP) production time, staff perception of safety, and job satisfaction was evaluated.

METHODS

For 2 weeks before implementation of a gravimetric-based TAWF, staff utilized an automated punch clock to document the time to prepare and check CSPs compounded volumetrically. Simultaneously, an anonymous, online survey was e-mailed to staff to evaluate their perceptions regarding the safety of volumetric preparation and satisfaction with their role preparing CSPs. At 30 and 90 days postimplementation of the TAWF, staff completed identical follow-up surveys to evaluate safety and satisfaction using the gravimetric-based TAWF. The TAWF software captured product preparation and check times postimplementation. Data regarding the accuracy of compounding were collected postimplementation and compared to accuracy data available in the published literature.

RESULTS

The median time to prepare CSPs preimplementation ( = 643) was 445 seconds versus 359 seconds ( = 728) 90 days after implementation of the gravimetric-based TAWF ( < 0.001). The median time to review and check CSPs was 45 seconds before implementation and 19 seconds 90 days after implementation ( < 0.01). Survey respondents preferred to use the TAWF to compound CSPs over volumetric preparation. There was no difference in respondents' perception of safety and accuracy of the TAWF preimplementation versus postimplementation.

CONCLUSION

The gravimetric-based TAWF preparation of hazardous CSPs was faster and more accurate than manual volumetric preparation and improved staff perception regarding the accuracy of the CSP preparation process.

摘要

目的

评估基于重量法的技术辅助工作流程(TAWF)系统对危险复方无菌产品(CSP)生产时间、员工安全认知及工作满意度的影响。

方法

在基于重量法的TAWF实施前2周,员工使用自动打卡钟记录以容量法配制和检查CSP的时间。同时,通过电子邮件向员工发送一份匿名在线调查问卷,以评估他们对容量法配制安全性的看法以及对其配制CSP工作的满意度。在TAWF实施后的30天和90天,员工完成相同的后续调查,以评估使用基于重量法的TAWF的安全性和满意度。TAWF软件记录实施后的产品配制和检查时间。收集实施后有关配制准确性的数据,并与已发表文献中的准确性数据进行比较。

结果

基于重量法的TAWF实施前(n = 643)配制CSP的中位时间为445秒,而实施90天后(n = 728)为359秒(P < 0.001)。审查和检查CSP的中位时间在实施前为45秒,实施90天后为19秒(P < 0.01)。调查受访者更倾向于使用TAWF而非容量法来配制CSP。受访者对TAWF实施前和实施后的安全性和准确性认知没有差异。

结论

基于重量法的TAWF制备危险CSP比手动容量法更快、更准确,并改善了员工对CSP制备过程准确性的认知。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验