Lemky Kim, Gagne Pierre, Konkin Jill, Stobbe Karl, Fearon Gervan, Blom Sylvia, Lapointe Geneviève Maltais
Brandon University, Manitoba, Canada.
Campus de l'Université de Montréal en Mauricie, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Can Med Educ J. 2018 Mar 27;9(1):e87-e99. eCollection 2018 Mar.
Canadian distributed medical education (DME) increased substantially in the last decade, resulting in positive economic impacts to local communities. A reliable and simple method to estimate economic contributions is essential to provide managers with information on the extent of these impacts. This review paper fills a gap in the literature by answering the question: What are the most applicable quantitative methods to assess the economic impact of Canadian DME programs?
The literature is reviewed to identify economic assessment methods. These are evaluated and compared based on the benefits, challenges, data needs, outputs and potential for use in the DME context.
We identified five economic impact methods used in similar contexts. Two of these methods have the potential for Canadian DME programs: the Canadian Input-Output (I-O) model and the Simplified American Council on Education (ACE) method.
Choice of a method is contingent on the ability to measure the salient economic impacts, and provide an output that facilitates sustainable decision making. This paper thus fills a gap by identifying methods applicable to DME. These methods will assist stakeholders to calculate economic impacts, resulting in both the advancement and sustainability of these programs over short-and long-term time frames.
在过去十年中,加拿大的分布式医学教育(DME)大幅增加,给当地社区带来了积极的经济影响。一种可靠且简单的经济贡献评估方法对于为管理人员提供有关这些影响程度的信息至关重要。这篇综述文章通过回答以下问题填补了文献空白:评估加拿大DME项目经济影响的最适用定量方法有哪些?
对文献进行综述以确定经济评估方法。根据这些方法在DME背景下的益处、挑战、数据需求、产出及应用潜力进行评估和比较。
我们确定了在类似背景下使用的五种经济影响方法。其中两种方法对加拿大DME项目具有应用潜力:加拿大投入产出(I - O)模型和简化的美国教育委员会(ACE)方法。
方法的选择取决于衡量显著经济影响的能力,并提供有助于可持续决策的产出。因此,本文通过确定适用于DME的方法填补了空白。这些方法将帮助利益相关者计算经济影响,从而在短期和长期时间框架内推动这些项目的发展并实现其可持续性。