• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于垂直剪切型骨盆骨折外固定的新型针配置的初步生物力学结果。

Preliminary biomechanical results of a novel pin configuration for external fixation of vertical shear pelvic fractures.

作者信息

Stewart Rebecca, Kieser David C, Scholze Mario, Hammer Niels, Stone Brad, Hooper Gary

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and MSM, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Anatomy-Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2018 Oct;88(10):1051-1055. doi: 10.1111/ans.14822. Epub 2018 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1111/ans.14822
PMID:30141241
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vertical shear fractures are unstable and potentially life-threatening injuries that require urgent reduction and stabilization. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical efficacy of three different external fixation pin configurations for vertical shear pelvic fractures in a cadaveric model. We hypothesized that a modified external fixation pin configuration with a crestal (CR) pin in the stable hemipelvis and bilateral supra-acetabular (SA) pins provides the greatest overall stability to axial loading.

METHODS

The force to failure within a standard standing axial load (maximum 650 N) was tested on 10 human cadaveric pelvises with vertical shear fractures. Three pin configurations were compared including iliac crest (IC), SA and a modified SA frame with a third CR pin on the stable hemipelvis. Both displacement at the posterior pelvis at 650 N and force to failure of >25 mm displacement was recorded.

RESULTS

The mean force to failure was highest with CR (499 N), then IC (350 N) and then SA (265 N) pin configurations, being statistically non-significant (P = 0.165). The minimum force to failure followed a similar trend with 296, 68 and 43 N for CR, IC and SA, respectively. About 1/4 CR, 1/4 IC and 2/9 SA pins sustained 650 N or more without failure.

CONCLUSION

It was shown that this new design may reliably withstand a seated physiological load of 250 N. However, none of the three pin configurations tested can reliably withstand a standing load of 650 N. Further experiments are needed to quantify these findings under physiological loading.

摘要

背景

垂直剪切骨折不稳定且可能危及生命,需要紧急复位和固定。本研究的目的是在尸体模型中比较三种不同外固定针配置用于垂直剪切型骨盆骨折的生物力学效果。我们假设在稳定半骨盆使用嵴部(CR)针和双侧髋臼上(SA)针的改良外固定针配置能为轴向载荷提供最大的整体稳定性。

方法

对10例垂直剪切骨折的人体尸体骨盆进行标准站立轴向载荷(最大650 N)下的破坏载荷测试。比较了三种针配置,包括髂嵴(IC)、SA以及在稳定半骨盆带有第三根CR针的改良SA框架。记录了650 N时骨盆后部的位移以及位移>25 mm时的破坏载荷。

结果

CR针配置的平均破坏载荷最高(499 N),其次是IC(350 N),然后是SA(265 N)针配置,差异无统计学意义(P = 0.165)。最小破坏载荷也呈类似趋势,CR、IC和SA分别为296、68和43 N。约1/4的CR针、1/4的IC针和2/9的SA针能承受650 N或更高载荷而不发生破坏。

结论

结果表明这种新设计可能可靠地承受250 N的坐姿生理载荷。然而,所测试的三种针配置均不能可靠地承受650 N的站立载荷。需要进一步实验在生理载荷下量化这些结果。

相似文献

1
Preliminary biomechanical results of a novel pin configuration for external fixation of vertical shear pelvic fractures.一种用于垂直剪切型骨盆骨折外固定的新型针配置的初步生物力学结果。
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Oct;88(10):1051-1055. doi: 10.1111/ans.14822. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
2
External fixation of unstable pelvic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.不稳定骨盆骨折的外固定:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Sep;89(9):1022-1027. doi: 10.1111/ans.15027. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
3
Effect of pin location on stability of pelvic external fixation.针的位置对骨盆外固定稳定性的影响。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Apr(361):237-44. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199904000-00030.
4
Biomechanical comparative study on external fixators of new configurations in the treatment of Tile C pelvic injury.新型外固定器治疗Tile C型骨盆损伤的生物力学对比研究
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 25;14(1):9544. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60341-x.
5
Orthogonal pin construct versus parallel uniplanar pin constructs for pelvic external fixation: a biomechanical assessment of stiffness and strength.骨盆外固定的正交针结构与平行单平面针结构:刚度和强度的生物力学评估
J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Feb;23(2):100-5. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181962e0e.
6
The T-pod is as stable as supraacetabular fixation using 1 or 2 Schanz screws in partially unstable pelvic fractures: a biomechanical study.T 型骨盆固定器在部分不稳定骨盆骨折中使用 1 或 2 枚骶髂螺钉固定与上方固定同样稳定:一项生物力学研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2020 Jul 18;25(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40001-020-00427-0.
7
Can a modified anterior external fixator provide posterior compression of AP compression type III pelvic injuries?改良前侧外固定架能否对前后向挤压型 III 型骨盆损伤提供后侧加压?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Sep;471(9):2862-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2993-8.
8
Pin placement in pelvic external fixation.骨盆外固定中的钢针放置
Injury. 1993 Oct;24(9):581-4. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(93)90117-o.
9
Anterior pelvic external fixation: is there an optimal placement for the supra-acetabular pin?骨盆前路外固定:髋臼上缘针是否存在最佳置入位置?
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2013 Dec;42(12):E125-7.
10
Ultrasound-guided supra-acetabular pin placement in pelvic external fixation: description of a surgical technique and results.超声引导下髋臼上钢针置入在骨盆外固定中的应用:一种手术技术的描述及结果
Injury. 2017 Nov;48 Suppl 6:S66-S74. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(17)30797-0.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of external fixation in the emergency department: applications, common errors, complications and their treatment.急诊科外固定的应用:应用、常见错误、并发症及其治疗
EFORT Open Rev. 2020 Apr 2;5(4):204-214. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190029. eCollection 2020 Apr.
2
Achievable pin spanning angulation in anterosuperior pelvic external fixation.可实现的前上骨盆外固定器的钉道跨越角度。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Oct;30(7):1163-1170. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02684-5. Epub 2020 May 1.
3
[Research progress on minimally invasive treatment of anterior pelvic ring fracture].
[骨盆前环骨折微创治疗的研究进展]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 15;34(4):529-535. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201907077.
4
Phenoxyethanol-Based Embalming for Anatomy Teaching: An 18 Years' Experience with Crosado Embalming at the University of Otago in New Zealand.基于苯氧乙醇的解剖教学防腐液:新西兰奥塔哥大学 18 年 Crosado 防腐液使用经验。
Anat Sci Educ. 2020 Nov;13(6):778-793. doi: 10.1002/ase.1933. Epub 2020 Jan 21.