Suppr超能文献

改良前侧外固定架能否对前后向挤压型 III 型骨盆损伤提供后侧加压?

Can a modified anterior external fixator provide posterior compression of AP compression type III pelvic injuries?

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics/Trauma, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Sep;471(9):2862-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2993-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current anterior fixators can close a disrupted anterior pelvic ring. However, these anterior constructs cannot create posterior compressive forces across the sacroiliac joint. We explored whether a modified fixator could create such forces.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined whether (1) an anterior external fixator with a second anterior articulation (X-frame) would provide posterior pelvic compression and (2) full pin insertion would deliver higher posterior compressive forces than half pin insertion.

METHODS

We simulated AP compression Type III instability with plastic pelvis models and tested the following conditions: (1) single-pin supraacetabular external fixator (SAEF) using half pin insertion (60 mm); (2) SAEF using full pin insertion (120 mm); (3) modified fixator with X-frame using half pin insertion; (4) modified fixator using full pin insertion; and (5) C-clamp. Standardized fracture compression in the anterior and posterior compartment was performed as in previous studies by Gardner. A force-sensitive sensor was placed in the symphysis and posterior pelvic ring before fracture reduction and the fractures were reduced. The symphyseal and sacroiliac compression loads of each application were measured.

RESULTS

The SAEF exerted mean compressions of 13 N and 14 N to the posterior pelvic ring using half and full pin insertions, respectively. The modified fixator had mean posterior compressions of 174 N and 222 N with half and full pin insertions, respectively. C-clamp application exerted a mean posterior load of 407 N.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior compression on the pelvis was improved using an X-frame as an anterior fixation device in a synthetic pelvic fracture model.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This additive device may improve the initial anterior and posterior stability in the acute management of unstable and life-threatening pelvic ring injuries.

摘要

背景

目前的前固定器可以闭合破裂的前骨盆环。然而,这些前向结构不能在骶髂关节处产生向后的压缩力。我们探讨了一种改良的固定器是否可以产生这种力。

问题/目的:我们确定了(1)具有第二个前关节(X 型框架)的改良前外部固定器是否会提供骨盆后部压缩,以及(2)全针插入是否比半针插入提供更高的后向压缩力。

方法

我们用塑料骨盆模型模拟了 AP 压缩 III 型不稳定,并测试了以下情况:(1)使用半针插入(60mm)的单钉髋臼上外固定器(SAEF);(2)使用全针插入(120mm)的 SAEF;(3)使用 X 型框架的改良固定器,半针插入;(4)使用全针插入的改良固定器;和(5)C 型夹。按照 Gardner 之前的研究标准,在前部和后部骨折间隙进行骨折压缩。在骨折复位前,将力敏传感器放置在耻骨联合和骨盆后部,并对骨折进行复位。测量每种应用的耻骨联合和骶髂压缩载荷。

结果

SAEF 使用半针和全针插入时,分别对骨盆后部施加了 13N 和 14N 的平均压缩力。改良固定器使用半针和全针插入时,分别对骨盆后部施加了 174N 和 222N 的平均压缩力。C 型夹的应用施加了平均 407N 的后向载荷。

结论

在合成骨盆骨折模型中,使用 X 型框架作为前固定装置可改善骨盆的后向压缩。

临床相关性

这种附加装置可能会改善不稳定和危及生命的骨盆环损伤的急性处理中前向和后向的初始稳定性。

相似文献

5
Effect of pin location on stability of pelvic external fixation.针的位置对骨盆外固定稳定性的影响。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Apr(361):237-44. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199904000-00030.

引用本文的文献

6
Damage control orthopaedics: State of the art.损伤控制骨科:当前技术水平
World J Orthop. 2019 Jan 18;10(1):1-13. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v10.i1.1.
9
Pelvic ring injuries: Surgical management and long-term outcomes.骨盆环损伤:手术治疗与长期疗效
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2016 Jan-Mar;7(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Sep 2.

本文引用的文献

3
Skeletal deformity after anterior external fixation of the pelvis.骨盆前路外固定术后的骨骼畸形
J Orthop Trauma. 2009 May-Jun;23(5):327-32. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181a23f5b.
4
Surgical anatomy for pelvic external fixation.骨盆外固定的手术解剖学
Clin Anat. 2008 Oct;21(7):674-82. doi: 10.1002/ca.20697.
9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验