Department of Orthopaedics/Trauma, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Sep;471(9):2862-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2993-8.
Current anterior fixators can close a disrupted anterior pelvic ring. However, these anterior constructs cannot create posterior compressive forces across the sacroiliac joint. We explored whether a modified fixator could create such forces.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined whether (1) an anterior external fixator with a second anterior articulation (X-frame) would provide posterior pelvic compression and (2) full pin insertion would deliver higher posterior compressive forces than half pin insertion.
We simulated AP compression Type III instability with plastic pelvis models and tested the following conditions: (1) single-pin supraacetabular external fixator (SAEF) using half pin insertion (60 mm); (2) SAEF using full pin insertion (120 mm); (3) modified fixator with X-frame using half pin insertion; (4) modified fixator using full pin insertion; and (5) C-clamp. Standardized fracture compression in the anterior and posterior compartment was performed as in previous studies by Gardner. A force-sensitive sensor was placed in the symphysis and posterior pelvic ring before fracture reduction and the fractures were reduced. The symphyseal and sacroiliac compression loads of each application were measured.
The SAEF exerted mean compressions of 13 N and 14 N to the posterior pelvic ring using half and full pin insertions, respectively. The modified fixator had mean posterior compressions of 174 N and 222 N with half and full pin insertions, respectively. C-clamp application exerted a mean posterior load of 407 N.
Posterior compression on the pelvis was improved using an X-frame as an anterior fixation device in a synthetic pelvic fracture model.
This additive device may improve the initial anterior and posterior stability in the acute management of unstable and life-threatening pelvic ring injuries.
目前的前固定器可以闭合破裂的前骨盆环。然而,这些前向结构不能在骶髂关节处产生向后的压缩力。我们探讨了一种改良的固定器是否可以产生这种力。
问题/目的:我们确定了(1)具有第二个前关节(X 型框架)的改良前外部固定器是否会提供骨盆后部压缩,以及(2)全针插入是否比半针插入提供更高的后向压缩力。
我们用塑料骨盆模型模拟了 AP 压缩 III 型不稳定,并测试了以下情况:(1)使用半针插入(60mm)的单钉髋臼上外固定器(SAEF);(2)使用全针插入(120mm)的 SAEF;(3)使用 X 型框架的改良固定器,半针插入;(4)使用全针插入的改良固定器;和(5)C 型夹。按照 Gardner 之前的研究标准,在前部和后部骨折间隙进行骨折压缩。在骨折复位前,将力敏传感器放置在耻骨联合和骨盆后部,并对骨折进行复位。测量每种应用的耻骨联合和骶髂压缩载荷。
SAEF 使用半针和全针插入时,分别对骨盆后部施加了 13N 和 14N 的平均压缩力。改良固定器使用半针和全针插入时,分别对骨盆后部施加了 174N 和 222N 的平均压缩力。C 型夹的应用施加了平均 407N 的后向载荷。
在合成骨盆骨折模型中,使用 X 型框架作为前固定装置可改善骨盆的后向压缩。
这种附加装置可能会改善不稳定和危及生命的骨盆环损伤的急性处理中前向和后向的初始稳定性。