Suppr超能文献

中低收入国家创伤受害者旁观者救助:发生率和培训干预的系统评价。

Bystander Assistance for Trauma Victims in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Prevalence and Training Interventions.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 May-Jun;23(3):389-410. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1513104. Epub 2018 Sep 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Lack of organized prehospital care may contribute to the disproportionate burden of trauma-related deaths in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends bystander training in basic principles of first aid and victim transport; however, prevalence of bystander or layperson assistance to trauma victims in LMICs has not been well-described, and organized reviews of existing evidence for bystander training are lacking. This systematic review aims to 1) describe the prevalence of bystander or layperson aid or transport for trauma victims in the prehospital setting in LMICs and 2) ascertain impacts of bystander training interventions in these settings.

METHODS

A systematic search of OVID Medline, Cochrane Library, and relevant gray literature was conducted. We included 1) all studies detailing prevalence of bystander-administered aid or transport for trauma victims in LMICs and 2) all randomized controlled trials and observational studies evaluating bystander training interventions. We extracted study characteristics, interventions, and outcomes data. Study quality was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria.

RESULTS

Sixty-two studies detailed prevalence of bystander transport and aid. Family members, police, and bus or taxi drivers commonly transported patients; a majority of patients, up to >94%, received aid from bystanders. Twenty-four studies examined impacts of training interventions. Only one study looked at transport interventions; the remainder addressed first aid training. Interventions varied in content, duration, and target learners. Evidence was generally of low quality, but all studies demonstrated improvements in layperson knowledge and skills. Five studies reported a mortality reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Heterogeneity in data reporting and outcomes limited formal meta-analysis. However, this review shows high rates of bystander involvement in prehospital trauma care and transport in LMICs and highlights the need for bystander training. Bystander training in these settings is feasible and may have an important impact on meaningful outcomes such as mortality. Categories of involved bystanders varied by region and training interventions should be targeted at relevant groups. "Train the trainer" models appear promising in securing community engagement and maximizing participation. Further research is needed to examine the value of bystander transport networks in trauma.

摘要

目的

缺乏有组织的院前急救可能导致中低收入国家(LMICs)创伤相关死亡人数不成比例。世界卫生组织(WHO)建议在急救和伤员转运的基本原理方面对旁观者进行培训;然而,LMICs 中旁观者或非专业人员对创伤患者的援助情况尚未得到很好的描述,也缺乏对旁观者培训现有证据的系统评价。本系统评价旨在:1)描述 LMIC 中院前环境中旁观者或非专业人员对创伤患者的援助或转运的流行情况;2)确定这些环境中旁观者培训干预的影响。

方法

对 OVID Medline、Cochrane 图书馆和相关灰色文献进行系统搜索。我们纳入了:1)详细描述 LMIC 中旁观者为创伤患者提供的援助或转运的流行情况的所有研究;2)评估旁观者培训干预措施的所有随机对照试验和观察性研究。我们提取了研究特征、干预措施和结局数据。使用推荐评估、制定与评价(GRADE)标准评估研究质量。

结果

62 项研究详细描述了旁观者转运和援助的流行情况。家庭成员、警察和公共汽车或出租车司机通常转运患者;多达 94%以上的患者接受了旁观者的援助。24 项研究评估了培训干预措施的影响。只有一项研究关注转运干预措施;其余研究均涉及急救培训。干预措施在内容、持续时间和目标学习者方面存在差异。证据总体质量较低,但所有研究均表明非专业人员的知识和技能有所提高。有 5 项研究报告了死亡率降低。

结论

数据报告和结局的异质性限制了正式的荟萃分析。然而,本综述表明,LMIC 中旁观者在院前创伤护理和转运中广泛参与,并强调了旁观者培训的必要性。在这些环境中,对旁观者进行培训是可行的,并且可能对有意义的结局(如死亡率)产生重要影响。参与的旁观者群体因地区而异,培训干预措施应针对相关群体。“培训培训师”模式似乎有望确保社区参与并最大限度地提高参与度。需要进一步研究来检验创伤中旁观者转运网络的价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验