Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019 Nov-Dec;48(6):906-921. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2018.1496441. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
Emergent life events (ELEs), or acute client stressors disclosed within psychotherapy sessions, are not addressed by many evidence-based psychosocial treatments (EBTs). Preliminary provider-report studies suggest that ELEs may interfere with effective EBT implementation. The present study offers a detailed, observational examination of ELEs and their impact on EBT within therapy sessions. Data were observationally coded from 274 sessions with 55 primarily low-income, Latino youth clients (58% male, ages 5-15) in the modular EBT condition (Modular Approach to Therapy for Children [MATCH]) of the Child STEPs California trial. The ELE Coding System-Revised was used to measure ELEs, their characteristics, and provider responses to ELEs, including provider adherence to MATCH. Interrater reliability was generally high. At least one ELE was identified in 13% of randomly selected sessions. ELEs ranged widely in content, and their characteristics did not cluster together. Providers responded more frequently to ELEs with non-EBT content (e.g., information gathering, empathy) than EBT content; use of the ELE as a "teaching moment" for EBT content was the least common response (40% of ELEs). Multilevel regression analyses revealed that compared to sessions without an ELE, ELE sessions were significantly associated with reduced provider adherence to MATCH. Within ELE sessions, higher client distress when discussing the ELE was associated with reduced provider adherence to MATCH, but only when ELE severity was high. Beyond provider report, observational measures indicate that ELEs are prevalent and unpredictable in community settings and disrupt EBT delivery. Findings can inform the development of structured ELE management procedures to enhance existing EBTs.
突发生活事件(ELE),或心理治疗过程中披露的急性客户压力源,许多基于证据的心理社会治疗(EBT)并未涉及。初步的提供者报告研究表明,ELE 可能会干扰有效的 EBT 实施。本研究对 ELE 及其对治疗过程中 EBT 的影响进行了详细的观察性检查。数据是从加利福尼亚州儿童 STEPs 试验的模块化 EBT 条件(儿童治疗的模块化方法[MATCH])中 55 名主要是低收入、拉丁裔青年客户(58%为男性,年龄 5-15 岁)的 274 次治疗会议中观察性编码的。修订后的 ELE 编码系统用于衡量 ELE、它们的特征以及提供者对 ELE 的反应,包括提供者对 MATCH 的遵守情况。评分者间信度通常较高。在随机选择的会议中,有 13%的会议确定了至少一个 ELE。ELE 的内容范围广泛,其特征没有聚集在一起。提供者对 ELE 中非 EBT 内容(例如信息收集、同理心)的反应频率高于 EBT 内容;将 ELE 用作 EBT 内容的“教学时刻”是最不常见的反应(40%的 ELE)。多层次回归分析显示,与没有 ELE 的会议相比,ELE 会议与提供者对 MATCH 的遵守显著降低有关。在 ELE 会议中,当客户在讨论 ELE 时感到更加痛苦时,与提供者对 MATCH 的遵守程度降低有关,但仅当 ELE 严重程度较高时才会如此。除了提供者报告外,观察性测量还表明,ELE 在社区环境中普遍存在且不可预测,并会破坏 EBT 的提供。研究结果可以为制定结构化的 ELE 管理程序以增强现有的 EBT 提供信息。