Dorfman Alex, Eilam David
School of Zoology, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
School of Zoology, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
We examined whether a hierarchy existed among attraction to (i) food; (ii) social partner(s); and (iii) familiar feeding location in spatial decision-making in rats. To determine this, lone food-deprived rats were trained to collect baits from 16 salient equispaced objects arranged in a grid layout. Some rats were trained with only the eight objects on the left baited; other rats with only the eight objects on the right baited. After training, dyads of one left-trained and one right-trained rats were tested, with the eight baits now divided into four on the left and four on the right sides of the arena. Rats were free either to go to the familiar objects that had been baited in the lone training trials, regardless of whether these objects were now actually baited; or, alternatively, they could go to baited objects regardless of their side and of the rats' past experience. Rats could also forage individually or together regardless of their past experience or actual bait location. We found that the rats primarily displayed attraction to baits, regardless of their location; followed by a preference to travel together; and then by a significant combined attraction to visit together baited objects (whether familiar or not). Accordingly, attraction to food had the prime influence, sociality the second, and familiarity with the environment the least, in establishing spatial foraging decisions.
我们研究了在大鼠的空间决策中,对(i)食物;(ii)社会伙伴;以及(iii)熟悉的进食地点的吸引力之间是否存在等级关系。为了确定这一点,将单独的食物剥夺大鼠训练从以网格布局排列的16个显著等距物体中收集诱饵。一些大鼠仅对左边的8个物体进行诱饵训练;其他大鼠仅对右边的8个物体进行诱饵训练。训练后,对一只左边训练的大鼠和一只右边训练的大鼠组成的二元组进行测试,此时8个诱饵被分成竞技场左边4个和右边4个。大鼠可以自由选择去在单独训练试验中被诱饵的熟悉物体,无论这些物体现在是否真的有诱饵;或者,它们也可以去有诱饵的物体,无论其位置以及大鼠过去的经验如何。大鼠也可以单独或一起觅食,无论它们过去的经验或实际诱饵位置如何。我们发现,大鼠主要表现出对诱饵的吸引力,无论其位置如何;其次是喜欢一起行动;然后是对一起访问有诱饵的物体(无论是否熟悉)有显著的综合吸引力。因此,在建立空间觅食决策时,对食物的吸引力影响最大,社会性其次,对环境的熟悉程度影响最小。