• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肥胖对脊髓刺激治疗慢性脊柱相关疼痛患者有效性的影响。

The impact of obesity on the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in chronic spine-related pain patients.

机构信息

Evidence-Based Pain Management, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue-Desk C25, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.

Evidence-Based Pain Management, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue-Desk C25, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.

出版信息

Spine J. 2019 Mar;19(3):476-486. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.006
PMID:30142457
Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Chronic pain and obesity are both on the rise. Spinal cord stimulation has gained increasing popularity in the pain management field for the treatment of spine-related chronic pain, however to-date, the correlation between the spinal cord stimulator effectiveness and increasing body mass index (BMI) has not been fully established.

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the correlation between patients' BMI and the percentage of pain relief as well as opioid utilization in chronic spine-related pain patients treated with spinal cord stimulation.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients with chronic spine-related pain who were treated with a spinal cord stimulator.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Eleven-point numeric rating scale for pain and opioid utilization.

METHODS

Following Institutional Review Board approval, data from all eligible subjects who had undergone successful spinal cord stimulation (SCS)-trial defined as ≥50% decrease in pain followed by SCS implant were collected and statistically analyzed. Patients were divided into four groups according to BMI. Self-reported pain scores on the 11-point numerical rating scale were collected at baseline, 6 months and 12 months post SCS-implant visits. Opioid utilization, if any, was collected at baseline and 12 months post-SCS implant.

RESULTS

In all, 181 patients were included. Thirty-three were under and/or normal weight (≤24.9 kg/m), 72 overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m), 63 obese (30.0-39.9 kg/m), and 13 morbidly obese (≥40.0 kg/m2). The estimated coefficients from multivariable linear regression analysis were -1.91% (95% CI: -2.82% to -0.991%) and -1.48% (95% CI: -2.30% to -0.660%) reduction in pain improvement per unit increase of BMI for 6 months and 12 months scores, respectively. The estimated coefficient of disability status was -15.3% (95% CI: -22.1% to -8.48%). The estimated coefficient for 12 month opioid equivalence was -0.08% (95% CI: -0.14 to -0.021), per` 1 mg unit increase of morphine opioid equivalency. The data showed a statistically significant negative association between increasing BMI and SCS effectiveness at 6 and 12 months post-SCS therapy with a 2% reduction in efficacy for every unit increase of BMI after adjusting for confounding factors and a 20% better response in underweight and/or normal patients over the morbidly obese individuals which was not related to baseline pain score level. The significant difference in pain scores at 6 months (p = .0003) and 12 months (p = .04) post-SCS implant between obese and nonobese patients was not attributable to differences in baseline pain scores. There was no significant change in opioid utilization between baseline and 12 months post-SCS therapy.

CONCLUSION

A negative association between SCS effectiveness and increasing BMI was found, whereas, no significant difference was noted amongst the various BMI cohorts and the daily opioid consumption.

摘要

背景

慢性疼痛和肥胖都呈上升趋势。脊髓刺激在治疗脊柱相关慢性疼痛的疼痛管理领域越来越受欢迎,然而,迄今为止,脊髓刺激器的有效性与不断增加的体重指数(BMI)之间的相关性尚未完全确定。

目的

我们旨在研究慢性脊柱相关疼痛患者接受脊髓刺激治疗时,患者 BMI 与疼痛缓解百分比和阿片类药物使用之间的相关性。

研究设计

回顾性队列研究。

患者样本

接受脊髓刺激器治疗的慢性脊柱相关疼痛患者。

结果测量

11 点数字评分量表用于疼痛和阿片类药物使用。

方法

在获得机构审查委员会批准后,收集所有符合条件的接受过成功脊髓刺激(SCS)试验的患者数据,定义为疼痛至少减轻 50%,随后植入 SCS。患者根据 BMI 分为四组。在 SCS 植入后的基线、6 个月和 12 个月收集自我报告的 11 点数字评分量表的疼痛评分。在基线和 SCS 植入后 12 个月收集阿片类药物的使用情况(如果有)。

结果

共纳入 181 名患者。其中 33 名患者体重不足和/或正常(≤24.9kg/m),72 名超重(25.0-29.9kg/m),63 名肥胖(30.0-39.9kg/m),13 名病态肥胖(≥40.0kg/m2)。多变量线性回归分析的估计系数分别为 -1.91%(95%置信区间:-2.82%至-0.991%)和-1.48%(95%置信区间:-2.30%至-0.660%),在 6 个月和 12 个月的评分中,BMI 每增加一个单位,疼痛改善减少 1.91%和 1.48%。残疾状况的估计系数为 -15.3%(95%置信区间:-22.1%至-8.48%)。12 个月阿片类药物等效物的估计系数为 -0.08%(95%置信区间:-0.14 至-0.021),每增加 1mg 吗啡阿片类药物等效物,阿片类药物等效物增加 0.08%。数据显示,在 SCS 治疗后 6 个月和 12 个月,BMI 与 SCS 疗效呈负相关,在调整混杂因素后,BMI 每增加一个单位,疗效降低 2%,与病态肥胖患者相比,体重不足和/或正常患者的反应性提高 20%,而与基线疼痛评分水平无关。SCS 植入后 6 个月(p=0.0003)和 12 个月(p=0.04)疼痛评分在肥胖和非肥胖患者之间的显著差异并非归因于基线疼痛评分的差异。SCS 治疗后,阿片类药物的使用量在基线和 12 个月之间没有显著变化。

结论

发现脊髓刺激器的有效性与 BMI 增加呈负相关,而在不同 BMI 组和每日阿片类药物使用量之间没有显著差异。

相似文献

1
The impact of obesity on the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in chronic spine-related pain patients.肥胖对脊髓刺激治疗慢性脊柱相关疼痛患者有效性的影响。
Spine J. 2019 Mar;19(3):476-486. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
2
Impact of biological sex on the outcomes of spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic pain.生物性别对慢性疼痛患者脊髓刺激治疗结局的影响。
Pain Pract. 2022 Apr;22(4):432-439. doi: 10.1111/papr.13097. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
3
High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at 10 kHz for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: 6-Month Australian Clinical Experience.10千赫兹高频脊髓刺激治疗慢性疼痛:澳大利亚6个月临床经验
Pain Physician. 2016 May;19(4):267-80.
4
Comparison of 10-kHz High-Frequency and Traditional Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain: 24-Month Results From a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial.10千赫高频与传统低频脊髓刺激治疗慢性腰腿痛的比较:一项多中心、随机、对照关键试验的24个月结果
Neurosurgery. 2016 Nov;79(5):667-677. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001418.
5
Long-term quality of life improvement for chronic intractable back and leg pain patients using spinal cord stimulation: 12-month results from the SENZA-RCT.脊髓刺激治疗慢性难治性腰背和下肢疼痛患者的长期生活质量改善:来自 SENZA-RCT 的 12 个月结果。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Aug;27(8):2035-2044. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1890-8. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
6
Fantastic Four: Age, Spinal Cord Stimulator Waveform, Pain Localization and History of Spine Surgery Influence the Odds of Successful Spinal Cord Stimulator Trial.神奇四侠:年龄、脊髓刺激器波形、疼痛定位和脊柱手术史影响脊髓刺激器试验成功的几率。
Pain Physician. 2020 Jan;23(1):E19-E30.
7
The Impact of Tobacco Cigarette Smoking on Spinal Cord Stimulation Effectiveness in Chronic Spine-Related Pain Patients.烟草香烟吸烟对慢性脊柱相关疼痛患者脊髓刺激效果的影响。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Oct;43(7):768-775. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000870.
8
10 kHz spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of non-surgical refractory back pain: subanalysis of pooled data from two prospective studies.10 kHz 脊髓刺激治疗非手术难治性背痛:两项前瞻性研究汇总数据的亚组分析。
Anaesthesia. 2020 Jun;75(6):775-784. doi: 10.1111/anae.15036.
9
High-frequency spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz for widespread pain: a retrospective survey of outcomes from combined cervical and thoracic electrode placements.高频脊髓刺激 10 kHz 治疗广泛性疼痛:颈椎和胸椎联合电极放置的结果回顾性调查。
Postgrad Med. 2019 Apr;131(3):230-238. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2019.1587564. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
10
Spinal Cord Stimulators: A Comparison of the Trial Period Versus Permanent Outcomes.脊髓刺激器:试验期与永久性结果比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jun 1;44(11):E687-E692. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002921.

引用本文的文献

1
An Evidence-Based Consensus for the Use of Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Non-Surgical Low Back Pain: The NEURON Group.神经刺激用于治疗非手术性下腰痛的循证共识:NEURON 小组
J Pain Res. 2025 Mar 14;18:1247-1274. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S500342. eCollection 2025.
2
[Spinal cord stimulation in refractory complex regional pain syndrome. A prospective study].[脊髓刺激治疗难治性复杂性区域疼痛综合征。一项前瞻性研究]
Rev Neurol. 2024 Aug 16;79(4):99-105. doi: 10.33588/rn.7904.2024087.
3
Adults with excess weight or obesity, but not with overweight, report greater pain intensities than individuals with normal weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
超重或肥胖的成年人比体重正常的成年人报告的疼痛强度更大:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Mar 6;15:1340465. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1340465. eCollection 2024.
4
Real-world outcomes in spinal cord stimulation: predictors of reported effect and explantation using a comprehensive registry-based approach.脊髓刺激的真实世界结果:基于综合注册研究方法的报告疗效及取出装置的预测因素
Pain Rep. 2023 Nov 15;8(6):e1107. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001107. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Evidence-based consensus guidelines on patient selection and trial stimulation for spinal cord stimulation therapy for chronic non-cancer pain.脊髓刺激疗法治疗慢性非癌痛的患者选择和试验刺激的循证共识指南。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Jun;48(6):273-287. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-104097. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
6
Real-world data and evidence in pain research: a qualitative systematic review of methods in current practice.疼痛研究中的真实世界数据与证据:对当前实践中方法的定性系统评价
Pain Rep. 2023 Feb 1;8(2):e1057. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001057. eCollection 2023 Mar-Apr.
7
Physiological Changes and Pathological Pain Associated with Sedentary Lifestyle-Induced Body Systems Fat Accumulation and Their Modulation by Physical Exercise.与久坐生活方式引起的身体系统脂肪积累相关的生理变化和病理性疼痛,以及运动对其的调节。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 17;18(24):13333. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413333.
8
An Unexpected Weight Loss in a Morbid Obese Patient with Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy for Chronic Neuropathic Pain.一名接受脊髓刺激疗法治疗慢性神经性疼痛的病态肥胖患者出现意外体重减轻。
Obes Surg. 2021 Sep;31(9):4183-4184. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05478-8. Epub 2021 May 25.
9
Treatment Strategies for Generator Pocket Pain.发生器口袋痛的治疗策略。
Pain Med. 2021 Jun 4;22(6):1305-1311. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab007.