Issing P R, Atie H
Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf‑, Hals- und Plastische Gesichtschirurgie, Klinikum Bad Hersfeld GmbH, Seilerweg 29, 36251, Bad Hersfeld, Deutschland.
HNO. 2018 Sep;66(9):693-697. doi: 10.1007/s00106-018-0551-0.
In Germany medical care of outpatients is mainly provided by general practitioners and medical specialists in private practice. The outpatient departments of hospitals are available for patients under defined circumstances, such as by referral from a specialist or for oncological diseases (§ 116b). The aim of this investigation was the evaluation of the elective outpatient cases.
The prospective study started in April 2013 and ended in March 2014. All elective outpatients were analyzed according to several items, such as personal and medical data, the reason, time and justification for presentation.
All in all 6463 elective patients were enrolled in this study. Children and the older patients were quantitatively more represented than the emergency patients. With respect to a defined score the majority of referrals were medically reasonable (87%), which correlated positively with the travelling distance to the patient's home.
This investigation emphasizes the usefulness of the German dual principle of specialist patient care that contributes to medically appropriate utilization of healthcare resources, which is not the case for emergency patients with a free choice of destination.
在德国,门诊医疗主要由私人执业的全科医生和专科医生提供。医院门诊部在特定情况下为患者服务,例如经专科医生转诊或针对肿瘤疾病(第116b条)。本研究的目的是评估择期门诊病例。
前瞻性研究于2013年4月开始,2014年3月结束。所有择期门诊患者均根据多项指标进行分析,如个人和医疗数据、就诊原因、时间及理由。
本研究共纳入6463例择期患者。儿童和老年患者在数量上比急诊患者更多。就特定评分而言,大多数转诊在医学上是合理的(87%),这与到患者家中的行程距离呈正相关。
本研究强调了德国专科患者护理双重原则的实用性,这有助于医疗资源的合理利用,而对于可自由选择就诊地点的急诊患者则并非如此。