Krittayaphong Rungroj, Winijkul Arjbordin, Methavigul Komsing, Wongtheptien Wattana, Wongvipaporn Chaiyasith, Wisaratapong Treechada, Kunjara-Na-Ayudhya Rapeephon, Boonyaratvej Smonporn, Komoltri Chulalak, Kaewcomdee Pontawee, Yindeengam Ahthit, Sritara Piyamitr
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Department of Cardiology, Central Chest Institute of Thailand, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Aug 25;18(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0911-4.
Anticoagulation therapy is a standard treatment for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) that have risk factors for stroke. However, anticoagulant increases the risk of bleeding, especially in Asians. We aimed to investigate the risk profiles and pattern of antithrombotic use in patients with NVAF in Thailand, and to study the reasons for not using warfarin in this patient population.
A nationwide multicenter registry of patients with NVAF was created that included data from 24 hospitals located across Thailand. Demographic data, atrial fibrillation-related data, comorbid conditions, use of antithrombotic drugs, and reasons for not using warfarin were collected. Data were recorded in a case record form and then transferred into a web-based system.
A total of 3218 patients were included. Average age was 67.3 ± 11.3 years, and 58.2% were male. Average CHADS, CHADS-VASc, and HAS-BLED score was 1.8 ± 1.3, 3.0 ± 1.7, and 1.5 ± 1.0, respectively. Antiplatelet was used in 26.5% of patients, whereas anticoagulant was used in 75.3%. The main reasons for not using warfarin in those with CHADS-VASc ≥2 included already taking antiplatelet (26.6%), patient preference (23.1%), and using non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) (22.7%). Anticoagulant was used in 32.3% of CHADS-VASc 0, 56.8% of CHADS-VASc 1, and 81.6% of CHADS-VASc ≥2. The use of NOACs increased from 1.9% in 2014 to 25.6% in 2017.
Anticoagulation therapy was prescribed in 75.3% of patients with NVAF. Among those receiving anticoagulant, 90.9% used warfarin and 9.1% used NOACs. The use of NOACs increased over time.
抗凝治疗是预防有卒中危险因素的非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者发生卒中的标准治疗方法。然而,抗凝剂会增加出血风险,尤其是在亚洲人群中。我们旨在调查泰国NVAF患者的风险特征和抗栓药物使用模式,并研究该患者群体不使用华法林的原因。
建立了一个全国性的NVAF患者多中心登记系统,纳入了泰国各地24家医院的数据。收集了人口统计学数据、心房颤动相关数据、合并症、抗栓药物使用情况以及不使用华法林的原因。数据记录在病例记录表中,然后转入基于网络的系统。
共纳入3218例患者。平均年龄为67.3±11.3岁,男性占58.2%。CHADS、CHADS-VASc和HAS-BLED评分的平均值分别为1.8±1.3、3.0±1.7和1.5±1.0。26.5%的患者使用抗血小板药物,75.3%的患者使用抗凝剂。CHADS-VASc≥2的患者中不使用华法林的主要原因包括已在服用抗血小板药物(26.6%)、患者偏好(23.1%)以及使用非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂(NOACs)(22.7%)。CHADS-VASc为0的患者中32.3%使用抗凝剂,CHADS-VASc为1的患者中56.8%使用抗凝剂,CHADS-VASc≥2的患者中81.6%使用抗凝剂。NOACs的使用比例从2014年的1.9%增至2017年的25.6%。
75.3%的NVAF患者接受了抗凝治疗。在接受抗凝治疗的患者中,90.9%使用华法林,9.1%使用NOACs。随着时间推移,NOACs的使用有所增加。