Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Mar 2;21(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-01928-4.
Concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are common in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics and antithrombotic treatment patterns of patients with concomitant CAD and AF from the COhort of antithrombotic use and Optimal INR Level in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Thailand (COOL-AF Thailand) registry.
Registry enrollment criteria included patients aged ≥ 18 years who were diagnosed with AF for any duration at any of 27 public hospitals located across Thailand during 2014-2017. The That Clinical Trials Registry study registration number is TCTR20160113002. Statistical comparisons of characteristics and treatment strategies were performed between patients with and without CAD.
Of a total of 3461 AF patients, 557 had concomitant CAD (16.1%). Patients with concomitant CAD and AF were significantly older, more likely to be male, had more comorbidities, and had more cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. History of stroke/transient ischemic attack and prior bleeding was not significantly different between groups. CHADS-VASc score and HAS-BLED score were both higher in patients with CAD than in patients without CAD (4.17 vs. 2.78, p < 0.001, and 2.01 vs. 1.45, p < 0.001, respectively). Utilization of oral anticoagulant was less in patients with CAD (76.0% vs. 84.3%, p < 0.001). Concomitant use of antiplatelet was found to be a major cause of oral anticoagulant (OAC) underutilization. Specifically, the rate of OAC prescription was 95.9% in patients without antiplatelet, and 43.7% in patients with antiplatelet. Among patients with CAD who were on OAC, the rate of concomitant antiplatelet prescription was still high. In this group, 63% of patients were on triple therapy when percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug eluting stent was performed within 1 year, and 32.2% of patients without prior PCI or acute coronary syndrome were taking at least one antiplatelet with OAC.
Among patients with concomitant CAD and AF, physicians were reluctant to discontinue antiplatelet. The use of antiplatelet discourages physicians from prescribing OAC. Underutilization of OAC may increase the risk of ischemic stroke, and an inappropriate combination of OAC and antiplatelet may increase the risk of bleeding. Trial registration The trial has been registered with the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR) which complied with WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform dataset. The Registration Number is TCTR20160113002 (05/01/2016).
在临床实践中,同时患有冠状动脉疾病(CAD)和心房颤动(AF)较为常见。本研究旨在通过泰国非瓣膜性心房颤动患者抗栓治疗与最佳国际标准化比值研究(COOL-AF Thailand)注册研究,调查同时患有 CAD 和 AF 患者的特征和抗栓治疗模式。
该研究的登记标准包括 2014 年至 2017 年期间在泰国 27 家公立医院中任何一家被诊断为任何持续时间的 AF 的年龄≥18 岁的患者。该临床试验注册号为 TCTR20160113002。对伴有和不伴有 CAD 的患者的特征和治疗策略进行了统计学比较。
在总共 3461 例 AF 患者中,557 例(16.1%)同时患有 CAD。同时患有 CAD 和 AF 的患者年龄较大,更可能为男性,合并症更多,且有更多心血管植入电子设备。两组间卒中/短暂性脑缺血发作和既往出血的病史并无显著差异。CAD 患者的 CHADS-VASc 评分和 HAS-BLED 评分均高于无 CAD 患者(4.17 比 2.78,p<0.001 和 2.01 比 1.45,p<0.001)。CAD 患者口服抗凝剂的使用率较低(76.0%比 84.3%,p<0.001)。发现联合使用抗血小板药物是导致口服抗凝剂(OAC)使用率低的主要原因。具体而言,无抗血小板药物的患者 OAC 处方率为 95.9%,而有抗血小板药物的患者为 43.7%。在接受 OAC 治疗的 CAD 患者中,抗血小板药物的联合使用仍然很高。在这组患者中,在 1 年内进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)时,63%的患者接受了三联治疗,在没有 PCI 或急性冠脉综合征的患者中,32.2%的患者同时使用 OAC 和至少一种抗血小板药物。
在同时患有 CAD 和 AF 的患者中,医生不愿意停止使用抗血小板药物。抗血小板药物的使用使医生不愿意开具 OAC。OAC 的使用率低可能会增加缺血性卒中的风险,而 OAC 和抗血小板药物的不适当联合可能会增加出血风险。试验注册 该试验已在泰国临床试验注册中心(TCTR)注册,该中心符合世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台数据集的要求。注册号为 TCTR20160113002(2016 年 5 月 1 日)。