Dr. Vithalrao Vikhe Patil College of Engineering, Ahmednagar, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India.
College of Engineering, An Autonomous Institute of the Government of Maharashtra, Pune, India.
ISA Trans. 2018 Dec;83:199-213. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
This paper accords the level control of single-input-single-output (SISO) level control system based on the fusion of sliding mode control (SMC) and evolutionary techniques or bio-inspired techniques. The non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) and multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) are considered as two evolutionary techniques. Here, a comparative analysis of performances of an optimal proportional-integral (PI) controller, proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller, conventional SMC, NSGA-II based tuned SMC and SMC parameter tuning using MOPSO algorithm has been carried out through MATLAB/SIMULINK. The objective functions, integral absolute error (IAE), integral squared error (ISE) and an integration of weighted objective function aggregated approach of the error performance indices, IAE and ISE are considered. Realistic conditions are used in a plant for testing the robustness of controller. The stability of the controller is successfully obtained which satisfies the Lyapunov stability criteria. Reduction in long settling time with tiny magnitude variations about an equilibrium point is achieved using bio-inspired techniques. The simulation as well as experimental results reveal that SMC parameter tuning based on NSGA-II algorithm gives a better performance as compared to the other design strategies.
本文基于滑模控制 (SMC) 和进化技术或仿生技术的融合,为单输入单输出 (SISO) 液位控制系统提供了一种水平控制方法。非支配排序遗传算法 II (NSGA-II) 和多目标粒子群优化 (MOPSO) 被视为两种进化技术。在这里,通过 MATLAB/SIMULINK 对最优比例积分 (PI) 控制器、比例积分微分 (PID) 控制器、传统 SMC、基于 NSGA-II 的调谐 SMC 以及使用 MOPSO 算法对 SMC 参数进行调整的性能进行了比较分析。目标函数、积分绝对误差 (IAE)、积分平方误差 (ISE) 以及误差性能指标的加权目标函数综合方法 IAE 和 ISE 都被考虑在内。在一个工厂中使用实际条件来测试控制器的鲁棒性。控制器的稳定性成功地得到了满足李雅普诺夫稳定性准则的要求。使用仿生技术可以减少关于平衡点的长调整时间和微小幅度变化。仿真和实验结果表明,基于 NSGA-II 算法的 SMC 参数调整与其他设计策略相比,性能更好。