Department of hepatobiliary surgery, Chongqing general hospital, 400013 Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Department of hepatobiliary surgery, Chongqing general hospital, 400013 Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec;42(6):564-569. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
To obtain a reasonable drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) for the treatment of choledocholithiasis.
Data of 350 consecutive patients who underwent LCBDE in our hospital from January 2014 to December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. All the patients were divided into three groups according to different drainage types after LCBDE, including T-tube group with 116 cases, primary closure (PC) group with 114 cases and stent insertion group with 120 cases. Operative parameters and outcomes were compared.
The operative time was no significant difference between the T-tube group (106.71 ± 5.19 min), PC group (105.46 ± 5.77 min) and stent insertion group (106.88 ± 5.91 min) (F = 2.175, P = 0.115). The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the stent insertion group (5.62 ± 0.70 d) than in the T-tube group (7.79 ± 0.85 d) and PC group (7.60 ± 0.80 d) (F = 279.649, P = 0.000). The hospitalization cost was significantly less in the stent insertion group (19,432.78 ± 661.74 yuan) than in the T-tube group (22,059.90 ± 697.98 yuan) and PC group (21,927.20 ± 772.02 yuan) (F = 512.492, P = 0.000). The incidence of postoperative biliary-specific complications was 2.59% (3/116 cases) in the T-tube group, 2.63% (3/114 cases) in the PC group, and 0% (0/120 cases) in the stent insertion group, but this difference was not statistically significant (χ = 3.177, P = 0.204). The return to normal levels of postoperative liver function tests (LFTs) was significantly faster in the stent insertion group and T-tube group than in the PC group (P < 0.05). The number of 314 patients were followed up for a median time of 20 months (range from 1-48 months), and no biliary stricture, cholangitis or stone recurrence occurred in these patients during that time.
Stent insertion shows better results when compared with T-tube drainage and primary duct closure in terms of postoperative hospital stay and hospitalization cost. It is the prior option for the choledochotomy closure after LCBDE in suitable patients.
为了在腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)治疗胆总管结石后获得合理的引流。
回顾性分析 2014 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月我院收治的 350 例连续接受 LCBDE 治疗的患者的临床资料。根据 LCBDE 后不同的引流方式,将所有患者分为 T 管组 116 例、一期缝合(PC)组 114 例和支架置入组 120 例。比较各组手术参数和结果。
T 管组(106.71±5.19min)、PC 组(105.46±5.77min)和支架置入组(106.88±5.91min)手术时间无显著差异(F=2.175,P=0.115)。支架置入组术后住院时间明显短于 T 管组(7.79±0.85d)和 PC 组(7.60±0.80d)(F=279.649,P=0.000)。支架置入组住院费用明显低于 T 管组(22059.90±697.98 元)和 PC 组(21927.20±772.02 元)(F=512.492,P=0.000)。T 管组术后胆系特异性并发症发生率为 2.59%(3/116 例),PC 组为 2.63%(3/114 例),支架置入组为 0%(0/120 例),但差异无统计学意义(χ²=3.177,P=0.204)。支架置入组和 T 管组术后肝功能恢复正常水平明显快于 PC 组(P<0.05)。314 例患者获得中位 20 个月(1-48 个月)的随访,随访期间无胆管狭窄、胆管炎或结石复发。
与 T 管引流和胆总管一期缝合相比,支架置入在术后住院时间和住院费用方面有更好的结果。对于适合的患者,它是 LCBDE 后胆管切开术的首选。