Lyon Matthew, Menon Seema, Jain Abhiney, Kumar Harish
Department of Surgery Darling Downs Health Service, Queensland Health, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia,
Surg Endosc. 2015 May;29(5):1094-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3797-y. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
It is well supported in the literature that laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) for choledocholithiasis has equal efficacy when compared to ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Decompression after supra-duodenal choledochotomy is common practice as it reduced the risk of bile leaks. We conducted a prospective non-randomized study to compare outcomes and length of stay in patients undergoing biliary stent insertion versus T-tube drainage following LCBDE via choledochotomy.
The study involved 116 patients with choledocholithiasis who underwent LCBDE and decompression of the biliary system by either ante-grade biliary stent or T-tube insertion. A 7 French straight/duodenal curve biliary Diagmed™ stent (9-11 cm) was placed in 82 patients (Biliary Stent Group). T-tube insertion was used for 34 patients (T-tube group). The length of hospital stay and complications for the selected patients were recorded. All trans-cystic common bile duct explorations were excluded from the study.
The mean hospital stay for patients who underwent ante-grade biliary stent or T-tube insertion after LBCDE were 1 and 3.4 days, respectively. This is a statistically significant result with a p value of less than 0.001. Of the T-tube group, two patients required laparoscopic washout due to bile leaks, one had ongoing biliary stasis and one reported ongoing pain whilst the T-tube was in situ. A complication rate of 11.2%, this was a significant finding. There were no complications or concerns reported for the Biliary Stent Group.
Our results show that there is a significant reduction in length of hospital stay and morbidity for patients that have ante-grade biliary stent decompression of the CBD post laparoscopic choledochotomy when compared T-tube drainage. This implies that ante-grade biliary stent insertion is likely to reduce costs and increase overall patient satisfaction. We support the use of ante-grade biliary stent insertion during LCBDE when primary closure is not preferred.
文献充分支持,对于胆总管结石,腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)与内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术相比,疗效相当。十二指肠上段胆总管切开术后减压是常见做法,因为它可降低胆漏风险。我们进行了一项前瞻性非随机研究,比较经胆总管切开行LCBDE后接受胆管支架置入术与T管引流术患者的结局和住院时间。
该研究纳入116例胆总管结石患者,这些患者接受了LCBDE及通过顺行胆管支架置入或T管置入进行的胆道系统减压。82例患者(胆管支架组)置入了一根7法式直型/十二指肠弯型Diagmed™胆管支架(9 - 11厘米)。34例患者采用T管置入(T管组)。记录所选患者的住院时间和并发症情况。所有经胆囊管胆总管探查术均被排除在研究之外。
LCBDE后接受顺行胆管支架置入或T管置入患者的平均住院时间分别为1天和3.4天。这是一个具有统计学意义的结果,p值小于0.001。在T管组中,2例患者因胆漏需要进行腹腔镜冲洗,1例存在持续性胆汁淤积,1例在T管留置期间报告持续疼痛。并发症发生率为11.2%,这是一个显著发现。胆管支架组未报告并发症或问题。
我们的结果表明,与T管引流相比,腹腔镜胆总管切开术后行顺行胆管支架减压的患者住院时间和发病率显著降低。这意味着顺行胆管支架置入可能会降低成本并提高患者总体满意度。我们支持在不倾向于一期缝合时,在LCBDE期间使用顺行胆管支架置入。