Unit of Population Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland; Swiss NCCR "LIVES - Overcoming Vulnerability: Life Course Perspectives", University of Geneva, Switzerland; Department of General Internal Medicine, Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, University of Geneva, Switzerland; Institute of Demography and Socioeconomics, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Institute of Demography and Socioeconomics, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Prev Med. 2018 Nov;116:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
Organised mammography screening programmes may reduce socioeconomic inequalities in breast cancer screening, but evidence is contradictory. Switzerland has no national organised mammography screening programme, but regional programmes were progressively introduced since 1999, giving the opportunity to conduct a nationwide quasi-experimental study. We examined the evolution of socioeconomic inequalities in mammography screening in Switzerland and if exposure to regional organised programmes reduced socioeconomic inequalities. Data of 10,927 women aged 50 to 70 years old were collected from the Swiss Health Interview Survey, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey repeated 5 times (1992-2012). Socioeconomic characteristics were assessed using education, income, employment status, and occupational class. Adjusted prevalence ratios of up-to-date mammography screening were estimated with Poisson regressions and weighted for sampling strategy and non-participation bias. In the absence of organised screening programmes (1992-1997), prevalence of mammography screening increased by 23% and was associated with tertiary education and working part time. During the period of progressive introduction of regionally organised programmes (2002-2012), prevalence of mammography screening increased by 19% every 5 years and was associated with exposure to regional programmes and with independent/artisan occupations. Tertiary education and working part time were no longer associated. Exposure to organised programmes did not modify socioeconomic inequalities except for employment status: not employed women benefitted more from organised programmes compared to women working full time. In conclusion, socioeconomic inequalities in mammography screening decreased over time but organised programmes did not greatly modify them, except women not employed whose prevalence passed employed women.
组织化的乳房 X 光筛查计划可能会减少乳腺癌筛查中的社会经济不平等,但证据存在矛盾。瑞士没有全国性的组织化乳房 X 光筛查计划,但自 1999 年以来逐步引入了区域性计划,为进行全国性的准实验研究提供了机会。我们研究了瑞士乳房 X 光筛查中社会经济不平等的演变情况,以及是否接触区域性组织化计划减少了社会经济不平等。我们从瑞士健康访谈调查中收集了 10927 名年龄在 50 至 70 岁的女性的数据,该调查是一项全国代表性的横断面调查,重复进行了 5 次(1992-2012 年)。社会经济特征使用教育程度、收入、就业状况和职业阶层来评估。使用泊松回归和加权抽样策略和非参与偏差来估计最新乳房 X 光筛查的调整后患病率比。在没有组织化筛查计划的情况下(1992-1997 年),乳房 X 光筛查的流行率增加了 23%,与高等教育和兼职工作有关。在区域性组织化计划逐步引入的期间(2002-2012 年),每 5 年乳房 X 光筛查的流行率增加了 19%,与接触区域性计划和独立/工匠职业有关。高等教育和兼职工作不再相关。除了就业状况外,接触组织化计划并没有改变社会经济不平等:与全职工作的女性相比,未就业的女性从组织化计划中获益更多。总之,乳房 X 光筛查中的社会经济不平等随着时间的推移而减少,但组织化计划并没有很大地改变它们,除了就业的女性超过了未就业的女性。