Suppr超能文献

泌尿外科手术中抗菌药物预防应用指南推荐的比较:变异性、缺乏共识及矛盾之处

Comparison of guideline recommendations for antimicrobial prophylaxis in urologic procedures: variability, lack of consensus, and contradictions.

作者信息

Ivan Samuel J, Sindhwani Puneet

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, 3000 Arlington Avenue, Toledo, OH, 43614, USA.

出版信息

Int Urol Nephrol. 2018 Nov;50(11):1923-1937. doi: 10.1007/s11255-018-1971-1. Epub 2018 Aug 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This review assesses guideline discrepancies for urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis and identifies opportunities for improvement of antimicrobial prophylaxis and stewardship.

METHODS

Literature search using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and association websites identified guidelines for review from the American Urological Association, Canadian Urological Association, European Association of Urology, Japanese Urological Association, and Association of Health-System Pharmacists/Infectious Disease Society of America/Surgical Infection Society/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America.

RESULTS

The greatest variability between guidelines was found in prophylaxis recommendations for prostate brachytherapy, transurethral resection of bladder tumor, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), and ureteroscopy with manipulation. Variability was also present in recommended duration of prophylaxis and recommended antibiotic. Contradictions between guidelines existed regarding prophylaxis for patients with indwelling stents undergoing ESWL, as well as for patients at risk of endocarditis undergoing urologic procedures. Procedures with the least variability in prophylaxis recommendation included diagnostic procedures (cystourethroscopy, urodynamic studies, and diagnostic ureteroscopy), transurethral resection of prostate, transrectal prostate biopsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, procedures involving prosthesis placement or intestine, and open or laparoscopic procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Consensus recommendations are present for several procedures, many of which still rely on non-urologic data. Several other procedures have variability in recommendations, generally due to a lack of strong data. The use of risk factors as indication for prophylaxis in many procedures is at times ambiguous and confusing. Together, these observations indicate a need for further research to provide more robust and consistent guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis and stewardship in the field of urology.

摘要

目的

本综述评估泌尿外科手术抗菌药物预防的指南差异,并确定改善抗菌药物预防和管理的机会。

方法

通过使用PubMed、Embase、Cochrane以及相关协会网站进行文献检索,确定了来自美国泌尿外科协会、加拿大泌尿外科协会、欧洲泌尿外科协会、日本泌尿外科协会以及卫生系统药师协会/美国传染病学会/外科感染学会/美国医疗保健流行病学学会的可供综述的指南。

结果

指南之间最大的差异存在于前列腺近距离放射治疗、经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术、体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)以及输尿管镜检查并操作的预防建议中。预防持续时间和推荐抗生素方面也存在差异。关于接受ESWL的留置支架患者以及接受泌尿外科手术有感染性心内膜炎风险患者的预防,指南之间存在矛盾。预防建议差异最小的手术包括诊断性手术(膀胱尿道镜检查、尿动力学研究以及诊断性输尿管镜检查)、经尿道前列腺切除术、经直肠前列腺活检、经皮肾镜取石术、涉及假体植入或肠道的手术以及开放或腹腔镜手术。

结论

对于一些手术存在共识性建议,其中许多仍依赖非泌尿外科数据。其他一些手术的建议存在差异,通常是由于缺乏有力数据。在许多手术中使用风险因素作为预防指征有时不明确且令人困惑。总体而言,这些观察结果表明需要进一步研究,以便为泌尿外科领域的抗菌药物预防和管理提供更有力且一致的指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验