• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于猎巫叙事的叙事:道德维度

A Narrative on The Witch-Hunt Narrative: The Moral Dimensions.

作者信息

Reamer Frederic G

机构信息

1 Rhode Island College, Providence, RI, USA.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2017 Mar;32(6):875-896. doi: 10.1177/0886260516657349.

DOI:10.1177/0886260516657349
PMID:30145962
Abstract

Ross Cheit's The Witch-Hunt Narrative raises a number of complex moral issues. Cheit's principal purpose is to challenge the belief that our society has overreacted to claims about the sexual abuse of children. Both directly and indirectly, Cheit's in-depth analysis broaches moral concerns pertaining to the integrity of child abuse allegations, investigations, civil litigation, and criminal prosecution, with an emphasis on the mixed motives of the parties involved in key cases. This article provides an overview of ethical questions pertaining to gathering information from very vulnerable individuals, informed consent, institutional review, protection of research participants, the use of deception and coercion, confidentiality and privacy, reporting research results, and conflicts of interest. In addition, the author discusses the phenomenon of whistle-blowing as it pertains to professionals' ethical judgments about disclosure of wrongdoing and misconduct. The author outlines key ethics-related concepts, applies relevant moral theory, and explores the implications of the moral issues raised by The Witch-Hunt Narrative for child sexual abuse victims, perpetrators, child welfare and law enforcement professionals, scholars and researchers, and the public at large.

摘要

罗斯·切特的《猎巫叙事》提出了一些复杂的道德问题。切特的主要目的是质疑一种观点,即我们的社会对儿童性虐待指控反应过度。切特的深入分析直接或间接地涉及到与虐待儿童指控的完整性、调查、民事诉讼和刑事起诉相关的道德问题,重点关注关键案件中各方的复杂动机。本文概述了与从极易受伤害的个体收集信息、知情同意、机构审查、研究参与者保护、欺骗和胁迫的使用、保密和隐私、研究结果报告以及利益冲突相关的伦理问题。此外,作者讨论了举报行为这一现象,因为它涉及专业人员对不当行为和渎职行为披露的道德判断。作者概述了关键的伦理相关概念,应用了相关的道德理论,并探讨了《猎巫叙事》提出的道德问题对儿童性虐待受害者、犯罪者、儿童福利和执法专业人员、学者和研究人员以及广大公众的影响。

相似文献

1
A Narrative on The Witch-Hunt Narrative: The Moral Dimensions.关于猎巫叙事的叙事:道德维度
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Mar;32(6):875-896. doi: 10.1177/0886260516657349.
2
The Witch-Hunt Narrative: Introduction and Overview.《猎巫叙事:引言与概述》
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Mar;32(6):784-804. doi: 10.1177/0886260516657357.
3
The Witch-Hunt Narrative: Turning a Blind Eye to the Evidence in the So-Called Name of Justice.猎巫叙事:以所谓正义之名对证据视而不见。
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Mar;32(6):948-955. doi: 10.1177/0886260516657356.
4
Commentary About Cheit's Witch-Hunt Narrative: The Historical Context.关于蔡特的政治迫害叙事的评论:历史背景
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Mar;32(6):940-947. doi: 10.1177/0886260516657352.
5
The Methodology of The Witch-Hunt Narrative: A Question of Evidence-Evidence Questioned.猎巫叙事的方法论:证据问题——受到质疑的证据
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Mar;32(6):853-874. doi: 10.1177/0886260516657350.
6
A Commentary From a Law Enforcement Perspective on The Witch-Hunt Narrative by Ross E. Cheit.从执法角度对罗斯·E·蔡特的“政治迫害”叙事的评论
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Mar;32(6):967-978. doi: 10.1177/0886260516657359.
7
The Witch-Hunt Narrative: Reflections on Knowledge About Child Sexual Abuse and the Impact of McMartin in the State of California.“猎巫”叙事:关于儿童性虐待知识及麦克马洪事件在加利福尼亚州影响的反思
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Mar;32(6):956-966. doi: 10.1177/0886260516657353.
8
Wrongful Acquittals of Sexual Abuse.性虐待案件的错误无罪判决。
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Mar;32(6):805-825. doi: 10.1177/0886260516657355.
9
A Response to "The Legacy of the Witch-Hunt Narrative".对《猎巫叙事的遗产》的回应
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Mar;32(6):979-1001. doi: 10.1177/0886260516681818.
10
A Critical Evaluation of the Factual Accuracy and Scholarly Foundations of The Witch-Hunt Narrative.对“猎巫”叙事的事实准确性和学术基础的批判性评估。
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Mar;32(6):897-925. doi: 10.1177/0886260516657351.