• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Nomos of the University: Introducing the Professor's Privilege in 1940s Sweden.《大学的法则:20世纪40年代瑞典教授特权之引入》
Minerva. 2018;56(3):381-403. doi: 10.1007/s11024-018-9348-2. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
2
[Analysis of characteristics shown in self introduction letter and professor's recommendation letter].[自荐信与教授推荐信所呈现的特征分析]
Korean J Med Educ. 2013 Sep;25(3):189-99. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2013.25.3.189. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
3
A professor's moral thinking at the abstract level versus the professor's moral thinking in the real life situation (consistency problem).教授在抽象层面上的道德思维与教授在现实生活情境中的道德思维(一致性问题)。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Jun;17(2):299-320. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9190-x. Epub 2010 Jan 27.
4
Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.发表科学论文应采用的规则。
Ann Ital Chir. 2016;87:1-3.
5
["The institution is working"--a professor's group portraits of himself and his staff].["该机构正在运转"——一位教授对自己及员工的集体描述]
Lakartidningen. 2005;102(43):3148-9.
6
Distinguishing online academic bullying: identifying new forms of harassment in a dissenting Emeritus Professor's case.区分在线学术霸凌:在一位持不同意见的名誉教授案例中识别新的骚扰形式。
Heliyon. 2021 Feb 24;7(2):e06326. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06326. eCollection 2021 Feb.
7
[Scientific standards in parasitology in historical perspective].[寄生虫学历史视角下的科学标准]
Wiad Parazytol. 2005;51(3):197-207.
8
Citizen expectations of 'academic entrepreneurship' in health research: public science, practical benefit.公民对健康研究中“学术创业”的期望:公众科学与实际益处。
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2356-74. doi: 10.1111/hex.12205. Epub 2014 May 14.
9
Reluctant entrepreneurs: patents and state patronage in new technosciences, circa 1870-1930.不情愿的企业家:约1870年至1930年新技术科学中的专利与国家资助
Isis. 2012 Jun;103(2):328-39. doi: 10.1086/666359.
10
Science and compassion: vacillation in nursing ideas 1940s-1960.科学与同情心:20世纪40年代至60年代护理理念的摇摆
Sch Inq Nurs Pract. 2000 Summer;14(2):115-38; discussion 139-41.

本文引用的文献

1
Why did universities start patenting? Institution-building and the road to the Bayh-Dole Act.大学为何开始申请专利?制度建设与通往《拜杜法案》之路。
Soc Stud Sci. 2008 Dec;38(6):835-71. doi: 10.1177/0306312708098605.
2
Patent law. New rules for German professors.专利法。德国教授的新规定。
Science. 2002 Nov 8;298(5596):1173-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1075269.
3
The truth about truth. [Review of : Shapin, S. A social history of truth: civility and science in seventeenth-century England. University of Chicago Press, 1994].关于真理的真相。[评:沙宾,S.《真理的社会史:17世纪英国的文明与科学》。芝加哥大学出版社,1994年]
Early Sci Med. 1998 Feb;3(1):66-74.

《大学的法则:20世纪40年代瑞典教授特权之引入》

The Nomos of the University: Introducing the Professor's Privilege in 1940s Sweden.

作者信息

Pettersson Ingemar

机构信息

Department of Economic History, Science and Technology Studies Center, Uppsala University, Box 513, 751 20 Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Minerva. 2018;56(3):381-403. doi: 10.1007/s11024-018-9348-2. Epub 2018 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1007/s11024-018-9348-2
PMID:30147148
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6096505/
Abstract

The paper examines the introduction of the so-called professor's privilege in Sweden in the 1940s and shows how this legal principle for university patents emerged out of reforms of techno-science and the patent law around World War II. These political processes prompted questions concerning the nature and functions of university research: How is academic science different than other forms of knowledge production? What are the contributions of universities for economy and welfare? Who is the rightful owner of scientific findings? Is academic science "work"? By following the introduction of the professor's privilege, the paper shows how spokespersons for the academic profession addressed such questions and contributed to a new definition of university science through boundary-setting, normative descriptions, and by producing symbolic relationships between science and the economy. The totality of those positions is here referred to as a "nomos" - that is: a generic and durable set of seemingly axiomatic claims about universities. This Swedish nomos, as it took shape in the 1940s, amalgamated classical notions of academic science as exceptional and autonomous with emerging ideas of inventiveness and close connections between academics and business. Crucially, though, the academic-industrial relations embedded in this nomos were private and individual, thus in sharp conflict with the ideas of entrepreneurial universities evolving globally by the end of the 20th century.

摘要

本文考察了20世纪40年代瑞典所谓“教授特权”的引入,并展示了这一大学专利法律原则是如何在二战前后的技术科学和专利法改革中产生的。这些政治进程引发了关于大学研究的性质和功能的问题:学术科学与其他知识生产形式有何不同?大学对经济和福利有哪些贡献?科学发现的合法所有者是谁?学术科学是“工作”吗?通过追溯教授特权的引入,本文展示了学术职业的代言人是如何处理这些问题的,并通过划定界限、进行规范性描述以及在科学与经济之间建立象征性联系,为大学科学的新定义做出贡献。这些立场的总体在这里被称为“法则”——也就是说:一套关于大学的看似公理的一般性和持久性主张。这种在20世纪40年代形成的瑞典法则,将学术科学作为特殊和自主的经典观念与新兴的创造性观念以及学者与商业之间的紧密联系融合在一起。然而,至关重要的是,这个法则中所包含的学术-产业关系是私人的和个体的,因此与20世纪末全球范围内不断发展的创业型大学理念形成了尖锐冲突。