• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

唇腭裂患者上前颌节段性牵引成骨与Le Fort I型截骨术后鼻咽部的头影测量变化

Cephalometric changes in nasopharyngeal area after anterior maxillary segmental distraction versus Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate.

作者信息

Tahmasbi Soodeh, Jamilian Abdolreza, Showkatbakhsh Rahman, Pourdanesh Fereydoun, Behnaz Mohammad

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Eur J Dent. 2018 Jul-Sep;12(3):393-397. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_374_17.

DOI:10.4103/ejd.ejd_374_17
PMID:30147405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6089043/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present study was designed to compare the effects of two surgical methods, anterior maxillary segmental distraction (AMSD) versus conventional Le Fort I osteotomy, on cephalometric changes of velopharyngeal area of patients with cleft lip and palate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted on 20 CLP in two groups. The first group had classic Le Fort I maxillary advancement and the second group had AMSD with a modified hyrax as an intraoral tooth-borne distractor. In the second group, 1 week after the surgery, activation of hyrax screw was started with the rate of 2 times a day for about 10 days. Initial and final lateral cephalograms were traced and analyzed by OrthoSurgerX software.

RESULTS

The changes in variables evaluating velopharyngeal status showed a significant difference between the two groups. In Group A (conventional), the mean of nasopharyngeal area and Nasopharynx floor length showed a significant increase ( < 0.05) after the surgery, while in Group B (DO), the trend of changes was vice-versa. The changes in SNA, overjet, and soft-tissue convexity were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

AMSD can improve facial profile, almost similar to the conventional Le Fort I advancement, while there is a significant decrease in nasopharyngeal; hereby there is no increase in the velopharyngeal sphincter.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较两种手术方法,即上颌前部节段性牵张成骨术(AMSD)与传统的Le Fort I截骨术,对唇腭裂患者腭咽区域头影测量变化的影响。

材料与方法

本研究对20例唇腭裂患者进行分组研究。第一组采用经典的Le Fort I上颌前徙术,第二组采用AMSD并使用改良的Hyrax作为口腔内牙支持式牵张器。在第二组中,术后1周开始每天2次激活Hyrax螺钉,持续约10天。通过OrthoSurgerX软件对初始和最终的侧位头影测量片进行描记和分析。

结果

评估腭咽状态的变量变化在两组之间存在显著差异。在A组(传统组)中,术后鼻咽部面积和鼻咽底部长度的平均值显著增加(<0.05),而在B组(牵张成骨组)中,变化趋势则相反。两组的SNA、覆盖和软组织凸度变化相似。

结论

AMSD可以改善面部轮廓,几乎与传统的Le Fort I前徙术相似,同时鼻咽部显著减小;因此腭咽括约肌没有增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b9/6089043/54763627bfff/EJD-12-393-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b9/6089043/ce5d23afca30/EJD-12-393-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b9/6089043/06b307a7a317/EJD-12-393-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b9/6089043/c7892df68f34/EJD-12-393-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b9/6089043/4ccb0735d74a/EJD-12-393-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b9/6089043/54763627bfff/EJD-12-393-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b9/6089043/ce5d23afca30/EJD-12-393-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b9/6089043/06b307a7a317/EJD-12-393-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b9/6089043/c7892df68f34/EJD-12-393-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b9/6089043/4ccb0735d74a/EJD-12-393-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e1b9/6089043/54763627bfff/EJD-12-393-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Cephalometric changes in nasopharyngeal area after anterior maxillary segmental distraction versus Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate.唇腭裂患者上前颌节段性牵引成骨与Le Fort I型截骨术后鼻咽部的头影测量变化
Eur J Dent. 2018 Jul-Sep;12(3):393-397. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_374_17.
2
Velopharyngeal Configuration Changes Following Le Fort I Osteotomy With Maxillary Advancement in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate: A Cephalometric Study.唇腭裂患者行Le Fort I型截骨术并上颌前徙术后的腭咽结构变化:一项头影测量研究
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2015 Nov;52(6):711-6. doi: 10.1597/14-146.1. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
3
Anterior maxillary segmental distraction for correction of maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary report.腭裂患者上颌前段骨段牵张成骨矫正上颌骨发育不足及牙列拥挤:初步报告。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Dec;38(12):1237-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.06.028. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
4
Dimensions of Velopharyngeal Space following Maxillary Advancement with Le Fort I Osteotomy Compared to Zisser Segmental Osteotomy: A Cephalometric Study.与齐塞尔节段性截骨术相比,Le Fort I型截骨术上颌前徙术后腭咽间隙的尺寸:一项头影测量研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:389605. doi: 10.1155/2015/389605. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
5
Tooth-borne distraction osteogenesis versus conventional Le Fort I in maxillary advancement of cleft lip and palate patients.唇腭裂患者上颌前突中牙支持式牵张成骨与传统Le Fort I型截骨术的比较
Minerva Stomatol. 2018 Jun;67(3):117-124. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4970.18.04121-3. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
6
Velopharyngeal changes after maxillary advancement in cleft patients with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device: a 1-year cephalometric follow-up.使用坚固外部牵张装置对腭裂患者行上颌骨牵张成骨术后的腭咽变化:一项为期1年的头影测量随访研究
J Craniofac Surg. 1999 Jul;10(4):312-20; discussion 321-2. doi: 10.1097/00001665-199907000-00005.
7
Skeletal, dental and facial aesthetic changes following anterior maxillary segmental distraction by tooth-borne device in patients with cleft lip and palate.唇腭裂患者牙支抗式上颌前段骨段牵张成骨术后的骨骼、牙齿和面部美学变化。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jun;50(6):774-781. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.09.010. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
8
Predictors of velopharyngeal insufficiency after Le Fort I maxillary advancement in patients with cleft palate.腭裂患者Le Fort I型上颌骨前移术后腭咽闭合不全的预测因素
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Aug;69(8):2226-32. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.142.
9
Anterior maxillary segmental distraction in the treatment of severe maxillary hypoplasia secondary to cleft lip and palate.上颌前部节段性牵引成骨术治疗唇腭裂继发严重上颌骨发育不全
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Sep 15;8(9):16022-8. eCollection 2015.
10
Pharyngeal Flap Is Effective Treatment for Post Maxillary Advancement Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Patients With Repaired Cleft Lip and Palate.咽瓣术是修复唇腭裂患者上颌前徙术后腭咽闭合不全的有效治疗方法。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jun;74(6):1207-14. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.12.016. Epub 2016 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of pharyngeal airway changes & velopharyngeal function following Le-fort I osteotomy in cleft lip and palate patients- a systematic review & meta analysis.唇腭裂患者行勒福Ⅰ型截骨术后咽气道变化及腭咽功能的评估——一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025 Jul-Aug;15(4):837-848. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.06.001. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
2
Finite element analysis of anterior maxillary segmental distraction osteogenesis using asymmetric distractors in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.单侧唇腭裂患者使用不对称牵张器进行上颌前部节段性牵张成骨的有限元分析
Korean J Orthod. 2025 Mar 25;55(2):142-153. doi: 10.4041/kjod24.184. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Velopharyngeal changes after maxillary distraction in cleft patients using a rigid external distraction device: A retrospective study.使用坚固外部牵张装置对上颌骨牵张术后腭裂患者腭咽的变化:一项回顾性研究。
Angle Orthod. 2016 Nov;86(6):962-968. doi: 10.2319/011216-33.1. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
2
Anterior Segmental Distraction Osteogenesis in the Hypoplastic Cleft Maxilla: Report of five cases.发育不全性腭裂上颌骨的前路节段性牵引成骨:5例报告
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2013 Aug;13(3):454-9. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
3
Hyrax application as a tooth-borne distractor for maxillary advancement.
Evaluation of Skeletal Changes after Mandibular Setback Surgery Using the NM-Low Z Plasty Technique in Skeletal Class III Patients.
使用NM-Low Z成形术对Ⅲ类骨性错颌患者下颌后缩手术骨骼变化的评估。
Eur J Dent. 2023 May;17(2):381-386. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1749364. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
4
Does the Alternate Rapid Maxillary ExpansionConstriction/Reverse Headgear Therapy Enhance Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions?交替快速上颌扩弓缩弓/反向头帽疗法是否能增加咽气道尺寸?
Turk J Orthod. 2022 Mar;35(1):7-15. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.20141.
5
Changes in Pharyngeal Airway Space and Craniocervical Angle after Anterior Bimaxillary Subapical Osteotomy.双颌前根尖下骨切开术后咽腔气道空间和颅颈角的变化。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Aug 10;2021:9978588. doi: 10.1155/2021/9978588. eCollection 2021.
使用蹄兔作为牙支持式上颌骨牵张器进行上颌骨前移。
J Craniofac Surg. 2011 Jul;22(4):1361-6. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31821c93d8.
4
Rotational movement of the anterior maxillary segment by hybrid distractor in patients with cleft lip and palate.唇腭裂患者中使用混合式牵张器对上颌前部节段进行旋转移动。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Sep;110(3):292-300. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.01.017. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
5
Maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery in cleft lip and palate patients: effects on speech and velopharyngeal function.上颌骨牵引与正颌手术治疗唇腭裂患者:对语音和腭咽功能的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jul;39(7):633-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.03.011. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
6
Anterior maxillary segmental distraction for correction of maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary report.腭裂患者上颌前段骨段牵张成骨矫正上颌骨发育不足及牙列拥挤:初步报告。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Dec;38(12):1237-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.06.028. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
7
Anterior segmental distraction of the hypoplastic maxilla by a tooth borne device: a study on the movement of the segment.使用牙支持式装置对上颌骨发育不全进行前节段牵引:节段移动的研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Aug;38(8):817-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.04.005. Epub 2009 May 12.
8
Maxillary anterior segmental advancement of hypoplastic maxilla in cleft patients by distraction osteogenesis: report of 2 cases.牵张成骨术治疗腭裂患者上颌骨发育不全的上颌前部节段性前移:2例报告
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Jan;66(1):126-32. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.033.
9
Cephalometric evaluation of patients treated by maxillary anterior segmental distraction: a preliminary report.上颌前部节段性牵引成骨治疗患者的头影测量评估:初步报告。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007 Sep-Oct;35(6-7):302-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2006.12.005. Epub 2007 Sep 24.
10
Anterior maxillary distraction by tooth-borne palatal distractor.通过牙支持式腭部牵张器进行上颌前部牵张
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 May;65(5):1044-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.12.049.