Buch Maya H, Johnsen Alyssa, Schiff Michael
Faculty of Medicine and Health, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, UK.
Global Clinical Research Immunoscience, Speciality Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019 Jan-Feb;37(1):127-132. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
To explore antinuclear autoantibody (ANA) and anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) autoantibody development during abatacept and tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment, and effects of switching from TNFi to abatacept in ANA/anti-dsDNA autoantibody-positive patients.
This was a post hoc analysis of biologic-naïve patients with active RA in ATTEST and AMPLE. In AMPLE, patients received subcutaneous abatacept or adalimumab (2 years). In ATTEST, patients received intravenous abatacept or infliximab (1 year), or placebo (6 months) then abatacept (6 months); at 1 year, all patients could receive abatacept (open-label long-term extension). Serum ANA/anti-dsDNA autoantibody levels were measured at baseline, Month 6 (ATTEST only), Years 1 and 2.
At baseline, 25.7 and 0.9% (AMPLE), and 21.6 and 8.4% of patients (ATTEST) were ANA/anti-dsDNA autoantibody positive, respectively. More baseline ANA/anti-dsDNA autoantibody-negative patients became positive during TNFi than abatacept treatment. In ATTEST (TNFi group), 48.5% (48/99; ANA) and 48.3% (57/118; anti-dsDNA) of patients seroconverted to positive status by Year 1, falling to 22.4% (22/98 ANA) and 13.3% (15/113; anti-dsDNA) by Year 2 after switching to abatacept. Of ANA/anti-dsDNA autoantibody-positive patients at Year 1, 41.9% and 68.9%, were negative at Year 2.
ANA/anti-dsDNA seroconversion was more frequent with TNFi than abatacept therapy; TNFi-associated seroconversion decreased after switching from TNFi to abatacept.
探讨在阿巴西普和肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)治疗期间抗核自身抗体(ANA)和抗双链DNA(抗dsDNA)自身抗体的产生情况,以及ANA/抗dsDNA自身抗体阳性患者从TNFi转换为阿巴西普的效果。
这是对ATTEST和AMPLE研究中初治的活动性类风湿关节炎患者进行的事后分析。在AMPLE研究中,患者接受皮下注射阿巴西普或阿达木单抗(2年)。在ATTEST研究中,患者接受静脉注射阿巴西普或英夫利昔单抗(1年),或安慰剂(6个月)后再接受阿巴西普(6个月);在1年时,所有患者均可接受阿巴西普(开放标签长期扩展治疗)。在基线、第6个月(仅ATTEST研究)、第1年和第2年测量血清ANA/抗dsDNA自身抗体水平。
在基线时,AMPLE研究中分别有25.7%和0.9%的患者,以及ATTEST研究中分别有21.6%和8.4%的患者ANA/抗dsDNA自身抗体呈阳性。与阿巴西普治疗相比,更多基线ANA/抗dsDNA自身抗体阴性的患者在TNFi治疗期间转为阳性。在ATTEST研究(TNFi组)中,到第1年时,48.5%(48/99;ANA)和48.3%(57/118;抗dsDNA)的患者血清学转换为阳性状态,在转换为阿巴西普治疗后,到第2年时降至22.4%(22/98;ANA)和13.3%(15/113;抗dsDNA)。在第1年时ANA/抗dsDNA自身抗体阳性的患者中,第2年时有41.9%和68.9%呈阴性。
与阿巴西普治疗相比,TNFi治疗时ANA/抗dsDNA血清学转换更频繁;从TNFi转换为阿巴西普后,与TNFi相关的血清学转换减少。