• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估老年人对通信工具的可用性和接受度。

Evaluating the Usability and Acceptability of Communication Tools Among Older Adults.

作者信息

Nilsen Marci Lee, Morrison Allison, Lingler Jennifer H, Myers Brad, Johnson Jonas T, Happ Mary Beth, Sereika Susan M, DeVito Dabbs Annette

出版信息

J Gerontol Nurs. 2018 Sep 1;44(9):30-39. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20180808-07.

DOI:10.3928/00989134-20180808-07
PMID:30148530
Abstract

Acutely ill patients may have trouble communicating their symptoms and needs verbally. The current study evaluated the usability and acceptability of six commercially available communication tools with older adults in a non-clinical, controlled setting. Participants evaluated various communication boards and communication applications (apps) by using the tools to communicate needs and symptoms in various scenarios. Participants completed a modified technology acceptance questionnaire and selected the tool they perceived as most useful and easy to use. Bivariate analysis was used to compare communication boards and apps. Performance on most tasks was significantly better using communication boards compared to communication apps. However, participants reported that given more time and training, the apps could be used effectively. A feasibility study is needed to determine whether acutely ill older adults can use these communication tools to successfully convey their symptoms and needs in a hospital setting [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 44(9), 30-39.].

摘要

重症患者可能难以通过言语表达自己的症状和需求。本研究在非临床的受控环境中评估了六种市售沟通工具对老年人的可用性和可接受性。参与者通过使用这些工具在各种场景中交流需求和症状,对各种沟通板和沟通应用程序(应用)进行了评估。参与者完成了一份经过修改的技术接受度问卷,并选择了他们认为最有用且易于使用的工具。采用双变量分析来比较沟通板和应用程序。与沟通应用相比,使用沟通板完成大多数任务的表现明显更好。然而,参与者报告称,如果有更多时间和培训,这些应用可以有效使用。需要进行一项可行性研究,以确定重症老年患者能否在医院环境中使用这些沟通工具成功传达他们的症状和需求[《老年护理杂志》,44(9),30 - 39]。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Usability and Acceptability of Communication Tools Among Older Adults.评估老年人对通信工具的可用性和接受度。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2018 Sep 1;44(9):30-39. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20180808-07.
2
Feasibility and acceptability of smartphone applications for seizure self-management in China: Questionnaire study among people with epilepsy.智能手机应用程序用于中国癫痫发作自我管理的可行性和可接受性:癫痫患者问卷调查研究
Epilepsy Behav. 2016 Feb;55:57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.11.024. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
3
Apps for IMproving FITness and Increasing Physical Activity Among Young People: The AIMFIT Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.用于改善年轻人健康状况和增加身体活动量的应用程序:AIMFIT实用随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Aug 27;17(8):e210. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4568.
4
Acceptability, usability and utility of a personalised application in promoting behavioural change in patients with osteoarthritis: a feasibility study in Norway.在挪威开展的一项可行性研究:探讨一款个性化应用程序在促进骨关节炎患者行为改变方面的可接受性、可用性和实用性。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 28;9(1):e021608. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021608.
5
Using a mobile health application to reduce alcohol consumption: a mixed-methods evaluation of the drinkaware track & calculate units application.使用移动健康应用程序减少酒精摄入量:对“饮酒意识追踪与计算单位”应用程序的混合方法评估。
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 17;17(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4358-9.
6
Smartphones and mobile applications (apps) in clinical nursing education: A student perspective.智能手机与移动应用程序在临床护理教育中的应用:学生视角。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Oct;69:172-178. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
7
The Role of Mobile Applications in Improving Alcohol Health Literacy in Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Help or Hindrance?移动应用程序在提高1型糖尿病青年酒精健康素养方面的作用:助力还是阻碍?
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Aug 6;9(6):1313-20. doi: 10.1177/1932296815588559.
8
Executive Functioning of Older Adults Correlates with Performance of Touchscreen App-Based Puzzles.老年人的执行功能与基于触摸屏应用程序的拼图表现相关。
Games Health J. 2018 Aug;7(4):271-276. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2017.0118.
9
Evaluating authentication options for mobile health applications in younger and older adults.评估年轻人和老年人移动健康应用程序的认证选项。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 4;13(1):e0189048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189048. eCollection 2018.
10
Exploring the Usability of Mobile Apps Supporting Radiologists' Training in Diagnostic Decision Making.探索支持放射科医生诊断决策培训的移动应用程序的可用性。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Mar;13(3):335-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.07.021. Epub 2015 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
iPad-based Apps to Facilitate Communication in Critically Ill Patients with Impaired Ability to Communicate: A Preclinical Analysis.基于iPad的应用程序促进沟通能力受损的危重症患者沟通:一项临床前分析。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov;25(11):1232-1240. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24019.
2
VidaTalk™ patient communication application "opened up" communication between nonvocal ICU patients and their family.VidaTalk™ 患者交流应用程序“打通”了无法发声的 ICU 患者与其家属之间的沟通渠道。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2021 Oct;66:103075. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103075. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
3
Overcoming Speech and language disorders in acute and critical care: 40 years later.
40年后:攻克急性和重症监护中的言语及语言障碍
Geriatr Nurs. 2020 May-Jun;41(3):337-338. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.04.008. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
4
Nursing Research Priorities in Critical Care, Pulmonary, and Sleep: International Delphi Survey of Nurses, Patients, and Caregivers.重症护理、肺部和睡眠护理的护理研究重点:对护士、患者和护理人员的国际德尔菲调查。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Jan;17(1):1-10. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201909-705ST.
5
Mobile Support for Older Adults and Their Caregivers: Dyad Usability Study.针对老年人及其照顾者的移动支持:二元组可用性研究。
JMIR Aging. 2019 May 23;2(1):e12276. doi: 10.2196/12276.