Hematology Department, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sanofi, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Jan;25(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.08.020. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
Because of the potential risk of tumor cell mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), it is crucial to evaluate any potential effect of plerixafor treatment in the presence of G-CSF on multiple myeloma (MM) cell mobilization. This was an open-label, multicenter, randomized, exploratory, safety study (NCT01753453) that investigated the extent of MM cell mobilization after treatment with G-CSF + plerixafor in patients who were deemed poor mobilizers of hematopoietic stem cells. The primary efficacy outcome was the number of MM cells in peripheral blood and apheresis product after G-CSF + plerixafor treatment versus G-CSF alone. Key secondary efficacy outcomes included overall survival and disease status up to 2 years after the first G-CSF dose. Twenty patients were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. There were no patients with MM cells in peripheral blood up to day 8 G-CSF administration in either treatment group. Up to day 8 no patient in the G-CSF + plerixafor arm and only 1 patient in the G-CSF arm mobilized at least 4.5 × 10 MM cells in the apheresis product. Nine of 10 patients from each treatment arm proceeded to transplantation. MM cells were detected in 5 patients from each treatment arm before and after transplantation. Adverse events observed in the G-CSF + plerixafor arm were consistent with the known safety profile of plerixafor. No MM cells were detected in peripheral blood of either treatment group up to day 8 of mobilization. Only 1 patient in the G-CSF alone group mobilized at least 4.5 × 10 MM tumor cells in apheresis product up to day 8. However, 50% of patients in both treatment arms had detectable amounts of MM cells in their peripheral blood pre- and post-transplantation. There were no new safety concerns with plerixafor.
由于粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)可能导致肿瘤细胞动员,因此评估在 G-CSF 存在的情况下,plerixafor 治疗对多发性骨髓瘤(MM)细胞动员的任何潜在影响至关重要。这是一项开放性、多中心、随机、探索性、安全性研究(NCT01753453),研究了在被认为造血干细胞动员不良的患者中,使用 G-CSF+plerixafor 治疗后 MM 细胞的动员程度。主要疗效终点是 G-CSF+plerixafor 治疗后与单独使用 G-CSF 相比外周血和单采产品中的 MM 细胞数。关键次要疗效终点包括首次 G-CSF 剂量后 2 年内的总生存和疾病状态。20 名患者被随机分配并接受至少 1 次研究治疗。在任何治疗组中,在 G-CSF 给药第 8 天前,均没有患者出现外周血 MM 细胞。在 G-CSF+plerixafor 组中,直到第 8 天没有患者在单采产品中动员至少 4.5×10^6 MM 细胞,而在 G-CSF 组中只有 1 名患者。每个治疗组的 9 名患者均进行了移植。在移植前后,每个治疗组的 5 名患者均检测到 MM 细胞。G-CSF+plerixafor 组中观察到的不良事件与 plerixafor 的已知安全性特征一致。在动员的第 8 天,在 G-CSF 单独治疗组的每个治疗组中均未检测到外周血中的 MM 细胞。在 G-CSF 组中,直到第 8 天,只有 1 名患者在单采产品中动员了至少 4.5×10^6 MM 肿瘤细胞。然而,在两个治疗组中,50%的患者在移植前后的外周血中均有可检测数量的 MM 细胞。plerixafor 没有新的安全性问题。