• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项评估单用粒细胞集落刺激因子或加用普乐沙福治疗的患者肿瘤细胞动员和单采产品污染的探索性、随机、Ⅱ期安全性研究

A Pilot, Exploratory, Randomized, Phase II Safety Study Evaluating Tumor Cell Mobilization and Apheresis Product Contamination in Patients Treated with Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Alone or Plus Plerixafor.

机构信息

Hematology Department, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Sanofi, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Jan;25(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.08.020. Epub 2018 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.08.020
PMID:30149148
Abstract

Because of the potential risk of tumor cell mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), it is crucial to evaluate any potential effect of plerixafor treatment in the presence of G-CSF on multiple myeloma (MM) cell mobilization. This was an open-label, multicenter, randomized, exploratory, safety study (NCT01753453) that investigated the extent of MM cell mobilization after treatment with G-CSF + plerixafor in patients who were deemed poor mobilizers of hematopoietic stem cells. The primary efficacy outcome was the number of MM cells in peripheral blood and apheresis product after G-CSF + plerixafor treatment versus G-CSF alone. Key secondary efficacy outcomes included overall survival and disease status up to 2 years after the first G-CSF dose. Twenty patients were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. There were no patients with MM cells in peripheral blood up to day 8 G-CSF administration in either treatment group. Up to day 8 no patient in the G-CSF + plerixafor arm and only 1 patient in the G-CSF arm mobilized at least 4.5 × 10 MM cells in the apheresis product. Nine of 10 patients from each treatment arm proceeded to transplantation. MM cells were detected in 5 patients from each treatment arm before and after transplantation. Adverse events observed in the G-CSF + plerixafor arm were consistent with the known safety profile of plerixafor. No MM cells were detected in peripheral blood of either treatment group up to day 8 of mobilization. Only 1 patient in the G-CSF alone group mobilized at least 4.5 × 10 MM tumor cells in apheresis product up to day 8. However, 50% of patients in both treatment arms had detectable amounts of MM cells in their peripheral blood pre- and post-transplantation. There were no new safety concerns with plerixafor.

摘要

由于粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)可能导致肿瘤细胞动员,因此评估在 G-CSF 存在的情况下,plerixafor 治疗对多发性骨髓瘤(MM)细胞动员的任何潜在影响至关重要。这是一项开放性、多中心、随机、探索性、安全性研究(NCT01753453),研究了在被认为造血干细胞动员不良的患者中,使用 G-CSF+plerixafor 治疗后 MM 细胞的动员程度。主要疗效终点是 G-CSF+plerixafor 治疗后与单独使用 G-CSF 相比外周血和单采产品中的 MM 细胞数。关键次要疗效终点包括首次 G-CSF 剂量后 2 年内的总生存和疾病状态。20 名患者被随机分配并接受至少 1 次研究治疗。在任何治疗组中,在 G-CSF 给药第 8 天前,均没有患者出现外周血 MM 细胞。在 G-CSF+plerixafor 组中,直到第 8 天没有患者在单采产品中动员至少 4.5×10^6 MM 细胞,而在 G-CSF 组中只有 1 名患者。每个治疗组的 9 名患者均进行了移植。在移植前后,每个治疗组的 5 名患者均检测到 MM 细胞。G-CSF+plerixafor 组中观察到的不良事件与 plerixafor 的已知安全性特征一致。在动员的第 8 天,在 G-CSF 单独治疗组的每个治疗组中均未检测到外周血中的 MM 细胞。在 G-CSF 组中,直到第 8 天,只有 1 名患者在单采产品中动员了至少 4.5×10^6 MM 肿瘤细胞。然而,在两个治疗组中,50%的患者在移植前后的外周血中均有可检测数量的 MM 细胞。plerixafor 没有新的安全性问题。

相似文献

1
A Pilot, Exploratory, Randomized, Phase II Safety Study Evaluating Tumor Cell Mobilization and Apheresis Product Contamination in Patients Treated with Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Alone or Plus Plerixafor.一项评估单用粒细胞集落刺激因子或加用普乐沙福治疗的患者肿瘤细胞动员和单采产品污染的探索性、随机、Ⅱ期安全性研究
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Jan;25(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.08.020. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
2
Patients' outcome after rescue plerixafor administration for autologous stem cell mobilization: a single-center retrospective analysis.自体干细胞动员时使用普乐沙福抢救后的患者结局:单中心回顾性分析
Transfusion. 2017 Jan;57(1):115-121. doi: 10.1111/trf.13883. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
3
Plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma and low peripheral blood CD34(+) cell count: results of a subset analysis of a randomized trial.培洛昔福联合粒细胞集落刺激因子与安慰剂联合粒细胞集落刺激因子动员多发性骨髓瘤且外周血 CD34+细胞计数低的患者中的 CD34+造血干细胞:一项随机试验的亚组分析结果。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Oct;18(10):1564-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
4
Plerixafor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for first-line steady-state autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in lymphoma and multiple myeloma: results of the prospective PREDICT trial.培洛昔福联合粒细胞集落刺激因子在淋巴瘤和多发性骨髓瘤一线稳定期自体外周血造血干细胞动员中的应用:前瞻性 PREDICT 试验结果。
Haematologica. 2013 Feb;98(2):172-8. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2012.071456. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
5
Plerixafor: A chemokine receptor-4 antagonist for mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or multiple myeloma.普乐沙福:一种趋化因子受体-4 拮抗剂,用于高剂量化疗治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤或多发性骨髓瘤后移植造血干细胞的动员。
Clin Ther. 2010 May;32(5):821-43. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.05.007.
6
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of plerixafor in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma.普乐沙福在非霍奇金淋巴瘤和多发性骨髓瘤患者中的药代动力学和药效学
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 Jan;15(1):39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.10.018.
7
Plerixafor in combination with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor after chemotherapy increases mobilization efficiency in patients with lymphoma or myeloma: results of a Phase II clinical trial.化疗后普乐沙福联合粒细胞集落刺激因子可提高淋巴瘤或骨髓瘤患者的动员效率:一项II期临床试验结果
Transfusion. 2015 Oct;55(10):2351-7. doi: 10.1111/trf.13186. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
8
Phase I/II Study of Intravenous Plerixafor Added to a Mobilization Regimen of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Lymphoma Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Collection.淋巴瘤患者自体干细胞采集时,粒细胞集落刺激因子联合静脉注射普乐沙福的 I/II 期研究
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Aug;23(8):1282-1289. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.04.024. Epub 2017 May 2.
9
Successful stem cell remobilization using plerixafor (mozobil) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with non-hodgkin lymphoma: results from the plerixafor NHL phase 3 study rescue protocol.使用培洛昔福(莫佐比)联合粒细胞集落刺激因子成功动员非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的干细胞:来自培洛昔福 NHL 3 期研究挽救方案的结果。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 Dec;15(12):1578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.08.005. Epub 2009 Oct 4.
10
Mobilization strategies with and without plerixafor for autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma.在多发性骨髓瘤患者的自体干细胞移植中使用和不使用普乐沙福的动员策略。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024 Oct;59(10):1440-1448. doi: 10.1038/s41409-024-02385-1. Epub 2024 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
G-CSF + plerixafor versus G-CSF alone mobilized hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma and lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.G-CSF+plerixafor 与单独使用 G-CSF 动员多发性骨髓瘤和淋巴瘤患者的造血干细胞:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2329140. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2329140. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
2
Stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: challenges, strategies, and current developments.多发性骨髓瘤中的干细胞动员:挑战、策略和最新进展。
Ann Hematol. 2023 May;102(5):995-1009. doi: 10.1007/s00277-023-05170-0. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
3
Efficacy of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization regimens in patients with hematological malignancies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
造血干细胞动员方案在血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中的疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022 Mar 22;13(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-02802-6.
4
Tumor Dormancy: Biologic and Therapeutic Implications.肿瘤休眠:生物学及治疗学意义
World J Oncol. 2022 Feb;13(1):8-19. doi: 10.14740/wjon1419. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
5
Role and Therapeutic Targeting of SDF-1α/CXCR4 Axis in Multiple Myeloma.基质细胞衍生因子-1α/趋化因子受体4轴在多发性骨髓瘤中的作用及治疗靶向
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 9;13(8):1793. doi: 10.3390/cancers13081793.
6
The dormant cancer cell life cycle.休眠癌细胞的生命周期。
Nat Rev Cancer. 2020 Jul;20(7):398-411. doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-0263-0. Epub 2020 Jun 2.