Colpaert F C, Leysen J E, Michiels M, van den Hoogen R H
Anesthesiology. 1986 Jul;65(1):41-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198607000-00007.
Doses of sufentanil (i.e., 0.01, 0.04, 0.16, 0.63, 2.5, 10, and 40 micrograms/rat) were injected either into the lumbar epidural space or intravenously in rats weighing +/- 250 g, and in vivo pharmacologic activities (i.e., prolongation of latency to tail withdrawal in response to noxious heat, blockade of cornea and pinna reflexes, increase of skeletal muscle tone), ex vivo mu-opiate receptor binding (i.e., displacement of specific 3H-sufentanil binding in thalamus, striatum, hippocampus, cortex, mamillary body-medulla oblongata segment, medulla oblongata, and in cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spinal cord), and drug concentrations in plasma, brain, cortex, and cerebellum, were determined. An ED50 dose of intravenous sufentanil of 0.075 micrograms/rat produced analgesia. CNS-mediated in vivo side effects (i.e., blockade of pinna and cornea reflexes, muscle rigidity) were apparent at 6-28 times higher doses. Epidural sufentanil also produced analgesia at an ED50 dose of 0.08 micrograms/rat, but CNS-mediated side effects occurred only at 35 to 76 times higher doses. This greater in vivo selectivity of epidural sufentanil in producing analgesia was consistent with ex vivo binding data that showed that in most areas of brain, but not in spinal cord, more mu-opiate binding occurs with intravenous than with epidural sufentanil. The two routes nonetheless differed by no more than a factor of approximately two in producing detectable levels of sufentanil both in plasma and in brain tissue.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
将不同剂量(即0.01、0.04、0.16、0.63、2.5、10和40微克/大鼠)的舒芬太尼注射到体重约250克的大鼠的腰段硬膜外间隙或静脉内,然后测定其体内药理活性(即对有害热刺激的甩尾潜伏期延长、角膜和耳廓反射阻滞、骨骼肌张力增加)、体外μ-阿片受体结合情况(即丘脑、纹状体、海马、皮质、乳头体-延髓段、延髓以及颈、胸和腰脊髓中特异性3H-舒芬太尼结合的置换)以及血浆、脑、皮质和小脑中的药物浓度。静脉注射舒芬太尼的ED50剂量为0.075微克/大鼠时产生镇痛作用。中枢神经系统介导的体内副作用(即耳廓和角膜反射阻滞、肌肉强直)在剂量高6 - 28倍时明显。硬膜外注射舒芬太尼在ED50剂量为0.08微克/大鼠时也产生镇痛作用,但中枢神经系统介导的副作用仅在剂量高35至76倍时出现。硬膜外舒芬太尼在产生镇痛作用方面具有更高的体内选择性,这与体外结合数据一致,该数据表明在大脑的大多数区域,但不是脊髓,静脉注射舒芬太尼比硬膜外注射产生的μ-阿片结合更多。然而,两种给药途径在血浆和脑组织中产生可检测水平的舒芬太尼方面的差异不超过约两倍。(摘要截断于250字)