Neuroimaging Laboratory, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
Department of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;65(4):1065-1078. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180609.
The concept of brain, cognitive, and neural reserves has been introduced to account for the apparent discrepancies between neurological damage and clinical manifestations. However, these ideas are yet theoretical suggestions that are not completely assimilated in the clinical routine. The mechanisms of the reserves have been extensively studied in neurodegenerative pathologies, in particular in Alzheimer's disease. Both human and animal studies addressed this topic by following two parallel pathways. The specific aim of the present review is to attempt to combine the suggestions derived from the two different research fields to deepen the knowledge about reserves. In fact, the achievement of a comprehensive theoretical framework on reserve mechanisms is an essential step to propose well-timed interventions tailored to the clinical characteristics of patients. The present review highlights the importance of addressing three main aspects: the definition of reserve proxy measures, the interaction between reserve level and therapeutic interventions, and the specific time-window of reserve efficacy.
脑、认知和神经储备的概念已经被引入,以解释神经损伤和临床表现之间明显的差异。然而,这些想法只是理论上的建议,在临床常规中尚未完全被吸收。储备的机制在神经退行性病变中得到了广泛的研究,特别是在阿尔茨海默病中。人类和动物研究都通过两条平行的途径来解决这个问题。本综述的具体目的是试图将来自两个不同研究领域的建议结合起来,以加深对储备的认识。事实上,储备机制的综合理论框架的建立是提出针对患者临床特征的适时干预措施的重要步骤。本综述强调了三个主要方面的重要性:储备代理措施的定义、储备水平与治疗干预之间的相互作用,以及储备效果的特定时间窗。