Division of Mental Health in Older Adults and Alzheimer Therapy and Research Center, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, 80336, Munich, Germany.
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Munich, Munich, Germany.
BMC Med. 2019 Feb 27;17(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1283-z.
The concept of reserve was established to account for the observation that a given degree of neurodegenerative pathology may result in varying degrees of symptoms in different individuals. There is a large amount of evidence on epidemiological risk and protective factors for neurodegenerative diseases and dementia, yet the biological mechanisms that underpin the protective effects of certain lifestyle and physiological variables remain poorly understood, limiting the development of more effective preventive and treatment strategies. Additionally, different definitions and concepts of reserve exist, which hampers the coordination of research and comparison of results across studies.
This paper represents the consensus of a multidisciplinary group of experts from different areas of research related to reserve, including clinical, epidemiological and basic sciences. The consensus was developed during meetings of the working groups of the first International Conference on Cognitive Reserve in the Dementias (24-25 November 2017, Munich, Germany) and the Alzheimer's Association Reserve and Resilience Professional Interest Area (25 July 2018, Chicago, USA). The main objective of the present paper is to develop a translational perspective on putative mechanisms underlying reserve against neurodegenerative disease, combining evidence from epidemiological and clinical studies with knowledge from animal and basic research. The potential brain functional and structural basis of reserve in Alzheimer's disease and other brain disorders are discussed, as well as relevant lifestyle and genetic factors assessed in both humans and animal models.
There is an urgent need to advance our concept of reserve from a hypothetical model to a more concrete approach that can be used to improve the development of effective interventions aimed at preventing dementia. Our group recommends agreement on a common dictionary of terms referring to different aspects of reserve, the improvement of opportunities for data sharing across individual cohorts, harmonising research approaches across laboratories and groups to reduce heterogeneity associated with human data, global coordination of clinical trials to more effectively explore whether reducing epidemiological risk factors leads to a reduced burden of neurodegenerative diseases in the population, and an increase in our understanding of the appropriateness of animal models for reserve research.
储备概念的建立是为了解释这样一种观察结果,即给定程度的神经退行性病变可能导致不同个体出现不同程度的症状。有大量关于神经退行性疾病和痴呆症的流行病学风险和保护因素的证据,但支撑某些生活方式和生理变量的保护作用的生物学机制仍知之甚少,这限制了更有效的预防和治疗策略的发展。此外,储备的不同定义和概念也存在,这阻碍了研究的协调和研究结果的比较。
本文代表了来自与储备相关的不同研究领域的多学科专家小组的共识,包括临床、流行病学和基础科学领域。共识是在 2017 年 11 月 24-25 日(德国慕尼黑)和 2018 年 7 月 25 日(美国芝加哥)举行的第一次国际认知储备会议工作组会议期间制定的。本文的主要目的是从神经退行性疾病储备的潜在机制的转化观点出发,结合来自流行病学和临床研究的证据与动物和基础研究的知识。本文讨论了阿尔茨海默病和其他脑疾病储备的潜在脑功能和结构基础,以及在人类和动物模型中评估的相关生活方式和遗传因素。
我们迫切需要将储备的概念从假设模型推进到更具体的方法,以便能够改进旨在预防痴呆症的有效干预措施的开发。我们小组建议就储备的不同方面的术语达成共识,共同制定术语词典;改善个体队列之间的数据共享机会;协调各实验室和研究小组的研究方法,减少与人类数据相关的异质性;协调全球临床试验,以更有效地探索降低流行病学风险因素是否会导致人群中神经退行性疾病负担的减少;并增加我们对动物模型用于储备研究的适宜性的理解。