Moţăţăianu Anca, Maier Smaranda, Bajko Zoltan, Voidazan Septimiu, Bălaşa Rodica, Stoian Adina
Department of Neurology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Târgu Mureş, Gh Marinescu 50, 540136, Târgu Mureş, Romania.
Department of Epidemiology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Târgu Mureş, Târgu Mureş, Romania.
BMC Neurol. 2018 Aug 27;18(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12883-018-1125-1.
Cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) in diabetes is among the strongest risk markers for future global and cardiovascular mortality. The aim of this study was to analyse CAN prevalence and to compare the associations between CAN, the glycaemic control, cardiovascular risk factors, peripheral neuropathy, retinopathy and macroangiopathy in patients with type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
One hundred ninety-five diabetic patients were included in this study. All patients were evaluated for detection of CAN (with standardised cardiovascular reflex tests), diabetes-related microvascular complications (polyneuropathy, retinopathy), common carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) and ankle-brachial index (ABI).
The prevalence of CAN was 39.1% in T2DM and 61.8% in T1DM patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that in T2DM, the odds [OR (95% confidence intervals)] of CAN increased with diabetes duration [1.67(1.42-1.92)], HbA1c [1.74(1.34-2.27)], cholesterol [1.01(1.00-1.01)], triglycerides [1.01(0.99-1.00)], smoking [2.35(1.23-4.49)], systolic blood pressure [1.01(1.00-1.03)], BMI [1.16(1.08-1.24)], glomerular filtration rate [0.91(0.88-0.93)], peripheral neuropathy [25.94(11.04-44.25)], retinopathy [13.13(3.03-84.73)] and IMT [10.12 (7.21-15.32)]. In T1DM, the odds of CAN increased with diabetes duration [1.62(1.13-2.31)], HbA1c [4.49(1.27-15.9)], age of patients [1.14(1.03-1.27)], glomerular filtration rate [0.94(0.89-0.99)], peripheral neuropathy [31.6(4.5-45.8)] and IMT [5.5(2.3-8.3)].
This study indicated that CAN is a more frequent complication in T1DM. Apart from glycaemic control, the existence of CAN is associated with potentially modifiable cardiovascular risk only in T2DM patients. The presence of other micro- and macrovascular complications increases the probability of having CAN in both types of DM (but more pronounced in T2DM).
糖尿病性心脏自主神经病变(CAN)是未来全球及心血管疾病死亡率最强的风险标志物之一。本研究旨在分析CAN的患病率,并比较1型糖尿病(T1DM)和2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中CAN、血糖控制、心血管危险因素、周围神经病变、视网膜病变和大血管病变之间的关联。
本研究纳入了195例糖尿病患者。所有患者均接受了CAN检测(采用标准化心血管反射试验)、糖尿病相关微血管并发症(多发性神经病变、视网膜病变)、颈总动脉内膜中层厚度(IMT)和踝臂指数(ABI)的评估。
T2DM患者中CAN的患病率为39.1%,T1DM患者中为61.8%。多因素逻辑回归分析表明,在T2DM中,CAN的比值比[OR(95%置信区间)]随糖尿病病程[1.67(1.42 - 1.92)]、糖化血红蛋白[1.74(1.34 - 2.27)]、胆固醇[1.01(1.00 - 1.01)]、甘油三酯[1.01(0.99 - 1.00)]、吸烟[2.35(1.23 - 4.49)]、收缩压[1.01(1.00 - 1.03)]、体重指数[1.16(1.08 - 1.24)]、肾小球滤过率[0.91(0.88 - 0.93)]、周围神经病变[25.94(11.04 - 44.25)]、视网膜病变[13.13(3.03 - 84.73)]和IMT[10.12(7.21 - 15.32)]而增加。在T1DM中,CAN的比值比随糖尿病病程[1.62(1.13 - 2.31)]、糖化血红蛋白[4.49(1.27 - 15.9)]、患者年龄[1.14(1.03 - 1.27)]、肾小球滤过率[0.94(0.89 - 0.99)]、周围神经病变[31.6(4.5 - 45.8)]和IMT[5.5(2.3 - 8.3)]而增加。
本研究表明CAN在T1DM中是更常见的并发症。除血糖控制外,CAN的存在仅在T2DM患者中与潜在可改变的心血管风险相关。其他微血管和大血管并发症的存在增加了两种糖尿病类型中发生CAN的可能性(但在T2DM中更明显)。