Suppr超能文献

诊断成像对伴有腰痛或坐骨神经痛的成年腰椎间盘突出症的诊断准确性尚不清楚:一项系统评价。

Diagnostic accuracy of diagnostic imaging for lumbar disc herniation in adults with low back pain or sciatica is unknown; a systematic review.

作者信息

Kim Jung-Ha, van Rijn Rogier M, van Tulder Maurits W, Koes Bart W, de Boer Michiel R, Ginai Abida Z, Ostelo Raymond W G J, van der Windt Danielle A M W, Verhagen Arianne P

机构信息

1Department of General Practice, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

2Department of Family Medicine, Chung-ang University Medical Center, 102, Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Chiropr Man Therap. 2018 Aug 21;26:37. doi: 10.1186/s12998-018-0207-x. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

MAIN TEXT

We aim to summarize the available evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of imaging (index test) compared to surgery (reference test) for identifying lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in adult patients.For this systematic review we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL (June 2017) for studies that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of imaging for LDH in adult patients with low back pain and surgery as the reference standard. Two review authors independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We calculated summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity using bivariate analysis, generated linked ROC plots in case of direct comparison of diagnostic imaging tests and assessed the quality of evidence using the GRADE-approach.We found 14 studies, all but one done before 1995, including 940 patients. Nine studies investigated Computed Tomography (CT), eight myelography and six Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The prior probability of LDH varied from 48.6 to 98.7%. The summary estimates for MRI and myelography were comparable with CT (sensitivity: 81.3% (95%CI 72.3-87.7%) and specificity: 77.1% (95%CI 61.9-87.5%)). The quality of evidence was moderate to very low.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic accuracy of CT, myelography and MRI of today is unknown, as we found no studies evaluating today's more advanced imaging techniques. Concerning the older techniques we found moderate diagnostic accuracy for all CT, myelography and MRI, indicating a large proportion of false positives and negatives.

摘要

正文

我们旨在总结与手术(参考标准)相比,影像学(索引测试)在识别成年患者腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)方面的诊断准确性的现有证据。在这项系统评价中,我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE和CINAHL(2017年6月),以寻找评估影像学对成年腰痛患者LDH的诊断准确性且以手术作为参考标准的研究。两位综述作者独立选择研究、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。我们使用双变量分析计算敏感性和特异性的汇总估计值,在对诊断性影像学检查进行直接比较的情况下生成关联ROC曲线,并使用GRADE方法评估证据质量。我们发现了14项研究,除一项外均在1995年之前完成,包括940名患者。9项研究调查了计算机断层扫描(CT),8项研究调查了脊髓造影,6项研究调查了磁共振成像(MRI)。LDH的先验概率从48.6%到98.7%不等。MRI和脊髓造影的汇总估计值与CT相当(敏感性:81.3%(95%CI 72.3 - 87.7%),特异性:77.1%(95%CI 61.9 - 87.5%))。证据质量为中等至极低。

结论

由于我们未找到评估当今更先进影像学技术的研究,所以当今CT、脊髓造影和MRI的诊断准确性未知。关于较旧的技术,我们发现所有CT、脊髓造影和MRI的诊断准确性中等,这表明存在很大比例的假阳性和假阴性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9eb/6102824/96cc83522fb0/12998_2018_207_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验