• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Scarf截骨术和Austin截骨术后足底压力分布及功能结果的比较

Comparison of Plantar Pressure Distribution and Functional Outcome after Scarf and Austin Osteotomy.

作者信息

Puchner Stephan E, Trnka Hans-Jörg, Willegger Madeleine, Staats Kevin, Holinka Johannes, Windhager Reinhard, Schuh Reinhard

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Foot and Ankle Center Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Orthop Surg. 2018 Aug;10(3):255-263. doi: 10.1111/os.12400.

DOI:10.1111/os.12400
PMID:30152604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6594478/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the changes of plantar pressure distribution in patients who underwent either Austin or Scarf osteotomy and underwent a postoperative rehabilitation program.

METHODS

Between September 2006 and December 2007, 50 participants who suffered from mild to moderate hallux valgus deformity were prospectively included in this study. An Austin osteotomy (Austin group) was performed in 25 patients and a Scarf osteotomy (Scarf group) in 25 patients. Indication for the Scarf or Austin technique was made according to the consensus of the Austrian society of foot and ankle surgery. Plantar pressure analysis was performed at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 6 months postoperatively. Furthermore, range of motion and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) questionnaire were evaluated.

RESULTS

In the big toe and first metatarsal head region in groups, maximum force, peak pressure, and force-time integral increased significantly from 4 weeks to 6 months postoperatively (P ≤ 0.001). The mean AOFAS score increased from 60.7 preoperatively to 93.1 6 months after Austin surgery and from 56.7 preoperatively to 94.4 6 months after Scarf surgery. The Austin group had a mean range of motion (ROM) of 68.5° that increased to a mean ROM of 75.5° 6 months postoperatively, while the Scarf group had a mean ROM of 67.8° that increased to a mean ROM of 68.2° 6 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Despite different surgical techniques and the degree of deformity, there were no differences in plantar pressure parameters and functional outcomes between both groups.

摘要

目的

研究接受奥斯汀截骨术或斯卡夫截骨术并进行术后康复计划的患者足底压力分布的变化。

方法

2006年9月至2007年12月,前瞻性纳入50例轻至中度拇外翻畸形患者。25例患者接受奥斯汀截骨术(奥斯汀组),25例患者接受斯卡夫截骨术(斯卡夫组)。根据奥地利足踝外科学会的共识选择斯卡夫或奥斯汀技术。术后4周、8周和6个月进行足底压力分析。此外,评估活动范围和美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)问卷。

结果

两组的大脚趾和第一跖骨头区域,术后4周和6个月之间,最大力、峰值压力和力-时间积分显著增加(P≤0.001)。奥斯汀手术后6个月,AOFAS平均评分从术前的60.7提高到93.1,斯卡夫手术后6个月从术前的56.7提高到94.4。奥斯汀组的平均活动范围(ROM)为68.5°,术后6个月增加到平均ROM为75.5°,而斯卡夫组的平均ROM为67.8°,术后6个月增加到平均ROM为68.2°。

结论

尽管手术技术和畸形程度不同,但两组之间的足底压力参数和功能结果没有差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Plantar Pressure Distribution and Functional Outcome after Scarf and Austin Osteotomy.Scarf截骨术和Austin截骨术后足底压力分布及功能结果的比较
Orthop Surg. 2018 Aug;10(3):255-263. doi: 10.1111/os.12400.
2
Rehabilitation after hallux valgus surgery: importance of physical therapy to restore weight bearing of the first ray during the stance phase.拇外翻手术后的康复:物理治疗对于在站立期恢复第一跖骨负重的重要性。
Phys Ther. 2009 Sep;89(9):934-45. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080375. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
3
[Scarf osteotomy for the treatment of forefoot deformity].[用于治疗前足畸形的斯卡夫截骨术]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2006;73(1):18-22.
4
Transfer of abductor hallucis tendon combined with scarf osteotomy versus single scarf osteotomy in moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity: a comparative retrospective cohort study.外展拇长肌腱转移联合 Scarf 截骨术与单纯 Scarf 截骨术治疗中重度拇外翻畸形的对比回顾性队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Oct 20;20(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2860-1.
5
Hallux valgus and first ray mobility. A prospective study.拇外翻与第一跖骨活动度。一项前瞻性研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Sep;89(9):1887-98. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01139.
6
Prospective study of the treatment of adult primary hallux valgus with scarf osteotomy and soft tissue realignment.前瞻性研究 Scarf 截骨术与软组织矫正治疗成人原发性拇外翻。
Foot Ankle Int. 2013 May;34(5):684-90. doi: 10.1177/1071100712472489. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
7
Scarf osteotomy with or without proximal phalangeal osteotomy for severe hallux valgus deformity.采用或不采用近节趾骨截骨术的斯卡夫截骨术治疗重度拇外翻畸形。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2014 Apr;22(1):39-41. doi: 10.1177/230949901402200111.
8
First Metatarsophalangeal Contact Properties Following Proximal Opening Wedge and Scarf Osteotomies for Hallux Valgus Correction: A Biomechanical Study.用于拇外翻矫正的近端开放楔形截骨术和Scarf截骨术后第一跖趾关节接触特性:一项生物力学研究。
Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Apr;38(4):430-435. doi: 10.1177/1071100716679461. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
9
A modified Austin/chevron osteotomy for treatment of hallux valgus and hallux rigidus.一种改良的奥斯汀/人字形截骨术治疗拇外翻和僵硬性拇趾。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2016 Mar;17(1):89-93. doi: 10.1007/s10195-015-0366-7. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
10
Plantar loading after chevron osteotomy combined with postoperative physical therapy.鹅足切开术联合术后物理治疗后的足底负荷。
Foot Ankle Int. 2010 Nov;31(11):980-6. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2010.0980.

引用本文的文献

1
Classification of hallux valgus deformity-is there a standard?拇外翻畸形的分类——是否有标准?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Nov;144(11):4737-4743. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05522-z. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
2
Correction potential and outcome of various surgical procedures for hallux valgus surgery: a living systematic review and meta-analysis.各种拇外翻手术的矫正效果和结局:一项活体系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Nov;144(11):4725-4736. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05521-0. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
3
Patient-reported outcome measures in studies on hallux valgus surgery: what should be assessed.拇外翻手术研究中的患者报告结局测量:应评估哪些内容。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Nov;144(11):4745-4752. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05523-y. Epub 2024 Sep 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Extended plantar limb (modified) chevron osteotomy versus scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus correction: A randomised controlled trial.延长跖侧肢体(改良)V形截骨术与Scarf截骨术治疗拇外翻的随机对照试验
Foot Ankle Surg. 2016 Jun;22(2):109-13. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2015.05.012. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
2
Biomechanical analysis of two fixation methods for proximal chevron osteotomy of the first metatarsal.第一跖骨近端V形截骨两种固定方法的生物力学分析
Int Orthop. 2014 May;38(5):983-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2286-1. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
3
Reliability of pressure measurements: the EM ED F system.压力测量的可靠性:EM ED F系统
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 1991 Feb;6(1):14-8. doi: 10.1016/0268-0033(91)90036-P.
4
Scarf osteotomy without internal fixation to correct hallux valgus.切开内固定术治疗拇外翻。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012 Dec;98(8):921-7. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.07.008. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
5
Scarf versus chevron osteotomy for the correction of 1-2 intermetatarsal angle in hallux valgus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.用于矫正拇外翻中第1-2跖骨间角的围巾式截骨术与V形截骨术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012 Jul-Aug;51(4):437-44. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2012.02.016. Epub 2012 Apr 8.
6
Plantar loading after chevron osteotomy combined with postoperative physical therapy.鹅足切开术联合术后物理治疗后的足底负荷。
Foot Ankle Int. 2010 Nov;31(11):980-6. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2010.0980.
7
Rehabilitation after hallux valgus surgery: importance of physical therapy to restore weight bearing of the first ray during the stance phase.拇外翻手术后的康复:物理治疗对于在站立期恢复第一跖骨负重的重要性。
Phys Ther. 2009 Sep;89(9):934-45. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080375. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
8
Equivalent correction in scarf and chevron osteotomy in moderate and severe hallux valgus: a randomized controlled trial.中度和重度拇外翻中围巾式截骨术和人字形截骨术的等效矫正:一项随机对照试验
Foot Ankle Int. 2008 Dec;29(12):1209-15. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2008.1209.
9
Comparison of plantar pressure, clinical, and radiographic changes of the forefoot after biplanar Austin osteotomy and triplanar Boc osteotomy in patients with mild hallux valgus.轻度拇外翻患者双平面Austin截骨术和三平面Boc截骨术后前足的足底压力、临床及影像学变化比较
Foot Ankle Int. 2008 Aug;29(8):817-24. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2008.0817.
10
Scarf versus chevron osteotomy in hallux valgus: a randomized controlled trial in 96 patients.拇外翻中围巾式截骨术与V形截骨术的比较:96例患者的随机对照试验
Foot Ankle Int. 2007 May;28(5):537-41. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0537.