Speech and Feeding Disorders Lab, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology Program, Division of Medical Sciences, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Dec;84(12):2849-2856. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13745. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
A recent double-blind placebo-controlled crossover 70-day trial demonstrated that a fixed combination of dextromethorphan and quinidine (DM/Q) improves speech and swallowing function in most patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In this study, a subset of participants, many of whom did not substantially improve while on DM/Q, were re-evaluated using computer-based speech analyses and expert clinician ratings of the overall severity of speech impairment.
Speech samples were recorded from the subset of 10 patients at four visits made at approximately 30-day intervals. The recordings were analysed by automated computer-based analysis of speech pausing patterns. Severity of speech impairment was rated by three experienced speech-language pathologists using direct magnitude estimation. Scores on patient-reported and clinician-administered scales of bulbar motor involvement were obtained at each visit.
The effects of DM/Q were detected on several of the objective speech measures, including total pause duration (s) (Cohen's d = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.70, 0.24), pause time (%) (d = 0.77, 95% CI -1.75, 0.21), and mean speech event duration (s) (d = 0.52, 95% CI -0.44, 1.47), but not on clinician ratings of speech or the speech components of the self-report or clinician-administered scales.
These findings suggest that even patients with modest improvement while on DM/Q may experience quantifiable improvements in speech when assessed using sensitive and objective measures. This study provides additional evidence of the positive impact of DM/Q on one or more of the neural systems that control bulbar motor function and production of speech.
最近一项为期 70 天的双盲安慰剂对照交叉试验表明,右美沙芬和奎尼丁的固定组合(DM/Q)可改善大多数肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者的言语和吞咽功能。在这项研究中,对一部分参与者进行了重新评估,其中许多参与者在使用 DM/Q 时并未得到实质性改善,评估方法是使用基于计算机的语音分析和专家临床医生对言语障碍整体严重程度的评分。
从大约 30 天间隔进行的 4 次就诊中,从 10 名患者的子集中记录语音样本。通过自动计算机分析语音停顿模式对这些记录进行分析。三名经验丰富的言语语言病理学家使用直接量度估计对言语障碍的严重程度进行评分。在每次就诊时,还获得了患者报告和临床医生管理的球部运动参与量表的评分。
DM/Q 对几项客观的语音测量指标产生了影响,包括总停顿时间(s)(Cohen's d=0.73,95%置信区间(CI)-1.70,0.24)、停顿时间(%)(d=0.77,95% CI -1.75,0.21)和平均言语事件持续时间(s)(d=0.52,95% CI -0.44,1.47),但对临床医生对言语的评估或自我报告或临床医生管理的量表的言语成分没有影响。
这些发现表明,即使在使用 DM/Q 时有适度改善的患者,在使用敏感和客观的测量方法评估时,也可能在言语方面获得可量化的改善。这项研究为 DM/Q 对控制球部运动功能和言语产生的一个或多个神经系统的积极影响提供了额外的证据。