Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Sapienza-University of Rome, Italy.
Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Sapienza-University of Rome, Italy.
Am J Med. 2018 Nov;131(11):1359-1366.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Aug 26.
Integrated care for the clinical management of atrial fibrillation patients is advocated as a holistic way to improve outcomes; the simple Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway has been proposed. The ABC pathway streamlines care as follows: 'A' Avoid stroke; 'B' Better symptom management; 'C' Cardiovascular and Comorbidity optimization.
We performed a post hoc analysis of the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) trial. An 'integrated care' approach was defined according to the ABC pathway. Patients fulfilling all criteria were categorized as the 'ABC' group; those not fulfilling all criteria were the 'non-ABC' group. Trial-adjudicated all-cause death, composite outcome of stroke/major bleeding/cardiovascular death, and first hospitalization were the main study outcomes.
Among the 4060 patients in the original cohort, 3169 (78%) had available data to compare integrated care (ABC; n = 222; 7%) vs non-ABC (n = 2947; 93%) management. Over a median follow-up of 3.7 (interquartile range, 2.8-4.6) years, atrial fibrillation patients managed with integrated care (ABC group) had lower rates for all study outcomes (all P < .001) compared with the non-ABC group. A Cox multivariable regression analysis showed that atrial fibrillation patients managed in the ABC group had a significantly lower risk of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.75), composite outcome (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.18-0.68), and first hospitalization (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.53-0.80).
The simple ABC pathway allows the streamlining of integrated care for atrial fibrillation patients in a holistic manner and is associated with a lower risk of adverse outcomes (including mortality, stroke/major bleeding/cardiovascular death, and hospitalization).
整合医疗是改善心房颤动患者临床管理的一种整体方法,提倡采用简单的心房颤动更好护理(ABC)路径。ABC 路径对护理进行了简化:“A”避免中风;“B”更好地管理症状;“C”优化心血管和合并症。
我们对心房颤动节律管理随访调查(AFFIRM)试验进行了事后分析。根据 ABC 路径,采用“综合护理”方法。满足所有标准的患者被归类为“ABC”组;未满足所有标准的患者被归类为“非 ABC”组。试验裁定的全因死亡、中风/大出血/心血管死亡复合结局和首次住院是主要研究结局。
在原始队列的 4060 例患者中,有 3169 例(78%)有可用数据比较综合护理(ABC;n=222;7%)与非 ABC(n=2947;93%)管理。中位随访 3.7 年(四分位间距,2.8-4.6)后,与非 ABC 组相比,接受综合护理(ABC 组)的心房颤动患者的所有研究结局发生率较低(均 P<0.001)。Cox 多变量回归分析显示,ABC 组的心房颤动患者全因死亡风险显著降低(风险比[HR],0.35;95%置信区间[CI],0.17-0.75)、复合结局风险(HR,0.35;95% CI,0.18-0.68)和首次住院风险(HR,0.65;95% CI,0.53-0.80)。
简单的 ABC 路径允许以整体方式简化心房颤动患者的综合护理,并且与不良结局(包括死亡率、中风/大出血/心血管死亡和住院)的风险降低相关。