Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Department of Internal Diseases, Diabetology and Nephrology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland.
Eur J Clin Invest. 2021 Mar;51(3):e13385. doi: 10.1111/eci.13385. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) constitute a heavy burden on healthcare expenditure due to their negative impact on clinical outcomes in the Middle East. The Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway provides a simple strategy of integrated approach of AF management: A-Avoid stroke; B-Better symptom control; C-Cardiovascular comorbidity risk management.
Evaluation of the AF treatment compliance to ABC pathway in DM patients in the Middle East. Assessment of the impact of ABC pathway adherence on all-cause mortality and the composite outcome of stroke/systemic embolism, all-cause death and cardiovascular hospitalisations.
From 2043 patients in the Gulf SAFE registry, 603 patients (mean age 63; 48% male) with DM were included in an analysis of ABC pathway compliance: A-appropriate use of anticoagulation according to CHA DS -VASc score; B-AF symptoms management according to the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) scale; C-Optimised cardiovascular comorbidities management.
86 (14.3%) patients were treated in compliance with the ABC pathway. During 1-year follow-up, 207 composite outcome events and 87 deaths occurred. Mortality was significantly lower in the ABC group vs non-ABC (5.8% vs 15.9%, P = .0014, respectively). On multivariate analysis, ABC compliance was associated with a lower risk of all-cause death and the composite outcome after 6 months (OR 0.18; 95% CI: 0.42-0.75 and OR 0.54; 95% Cl: 0.30-1.00, respectively) and at 1 year (OR 0.30; 95% Cl: 0.11-0.76 and OR 0.57; 95% Cl: 0.33-0.97, respectively) vs the non-ABC group.
Compliance with the ABC pathway care was independently associated with the reduced risk of all-cause death and the composite outcome in DM patients with AF, highlighting the importance of an integrated approach to AF management.
心房颤动(AF)和糖尿病(DM)由于对中东临床结局的负面影响,给医疗保健支出带来了沉重负担。心房颤动更好的护理(ABC)途径提供了一种简单的房颤管理综合方法策略:A-避免中风;B-更好的症状控制;C-心血管合并症风险管理。
评估中东 DM 患者对 ABC 途径的房颤治疗依从性。评估 ABC 途径依从性对全因死亡率和中风/全身性栓塞、全因死亡和心血管住院的复合结局的影响。
在海湾 SAFE 注册研究的 2043 例患者中,纳入了 603 例(平均年龄 63 岁;48%为男性)DM 患者进行 ABC 途径依从性分析:A-根据 CHA DS-VASc 评分适当使用抗凝剂;B-EHRA 量表评估房颤症状管理;C-优化心血管合并症管理。
86(14.3%)例患者按 ABC 途径治疗。在 1 年随访期间,发生了 207 例复合结局事件和 87 例死亡。ABC 组的死亡率明显低于非 ABC 组(5.8% vs 15.9%,P=0.0014)。多变量分析显示,ABC 依从性与 6 个月后全因死亡和复合结局的风险降低相关(OR 0.18;95%CI:0.42-0.75 和 OR 0.54;95%CI:0.30-1.00),1 年后(OR 0.30;95%CI:0.11-0.76 和 OR 0.57;95%CI:0.33-0.97)与非 ABC 组相比。
在 AF 合并 DM 患者中,遵循 ABC 途径护理与全因死亡和复合结局风险降低独立相关,突出了房颤管理综合方法的重要性。