Badawi Nermeen, Ismail Ahmed Taha
Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufiya University, Shebin El-Kom, Menoufiya, Egypt.
Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain-Shams University, Abbaseya, Cairo, Egypt.
J Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug 1;2018:3408614. doi: 10.1155/2018/3408614. eCollection 2018.
This study compares the results of Y-split recession versus de Decker's (modified Cüppers) Faden techniques of medial rectus (MR) muscles for the management of essential infantile esotropia (IET).
Fifty patients had IET divided into Group A who underwent Y-split recession of MR muscles and Group B who underwent de Decker's Faden technique of MR muscles. All patients had complete ophthalmic examination done including deviation angle measurement and met the inclusion criteria of the study. Operations were performed using general anesthesia. Patients were followed up at day 1, week 1, and months 1, 3, and 6 after operation.
The mean age distribution for group A was 21.56 months (SD 12.55) and for group B was 21.4 months (SD 12.35), and the mean postoperative follow-up interval was 6 months for both groups. The preoperative maximum angle of deviation in both groups ranged from 15 to 40 degrees, while the minimum angle of deviation ranged from 10 to 20 degrees. Immediately postoperatively both groups showed 88% of patients with satisfactory results (within 10 degrees of orthotropia). Group A showed two patients (8%) with ET and one patient (4%) with exotropia (XT). For group B, it showed one patient (4%) with ET and two patients (8%) with XT. Three patients in each group underwent a second intervention. All patients remained within the satisfactory range.
The results of this study suggest that both techniques show comparable results for the correction of IET.
本研究比较了内直肌Y形徙后术与德·德克尔(改良屈普斯)缝线固定术治疗原发性婴儿型内斜视(IET)的效果。
50例IET患者被分为A组(接受内直肌Y形徙后术)和B组(接受内直肌德·德克尔缝线固定术)。所有患者均进行了包括斜视角度测量在内的全面眼科检查,并符合本研究的纳入标准。手术采用全身麻醉。术后第1天、第1周以及第1、3和6个月对患者进行随访。
A组的平均年龄分布为21.56个月(标准差12.55),B组为21.4个月(标准差12.35),两组的平均术后随访时间均为6个月。两组术前最大斜视角度范围为15至40度,最小斜视角度范围为10至20度。术后即刻,两组均有88%的患者效果满意(正位偏差在10度以内)。A组有2例患者(8%)为内斜视,1例患者(4%)为外斜视。B组有1例患者(4%)为内斜视,2例患者(8%)为外斜视。每组有3例患者接受了二次干预。所有患者仍处于满意范围内。
本研究结果表明,两种技术在矫正IET方面效果相当。