a Department of Life Science Engineering , University of Applied Sciences , Giessen , Germany.
b Department of Vascular Surgery , Städtisches Klinikum Bogenhausen , Munich , Germany.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2018 Nov;15(11):773-781. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2018.1513134.
Surgical smoke resulting from electrocauterization is a health risk for operating room personnel. The U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health recommends the use of local exhaust ventilation such as a portable smoke evacuation system to reduce surgical smoke, but its efficiency has never been assessed under experimental conditions. In this study, particle filtration efficiencies of five commercially available smoke evacuation systems were investigated in a model operating room. Two cutting angles, the devices' suction capacities, three unidirectional displacement flow rates, and the noise exposures were considered. Results demonstrated that portable smoke evacuation systems reduce surgical smoke up to 99% under optimal conditions. A cutting angle of 45°, the device's maximum suction capacity, and a unidirectional displacement flow rate of 10,500 m³/hr were advantageous. Sound levels ranged between 51-69 dBA and exceeded recommended threshold limits, if used with medium or maximum suction capacity. Hence, portable smoke evacuation systems are beneficial and are recommended. However, a combination with general unidirectional room ventilation and a strict limitation of the use of electrocauterization is strongly advised.
由于电外科烧灼产生的手术烟雾会对手术室人员的健康造成危害。美国国家职业安全与健康研究所建议使用局部排气通风设备,例如便携式烟雾抽吸系统来减少手术烟雾,但这些设备的效率从未在实验条件下进行过评估。在这项研究中,在模型手术室中研究了五种市售烟雾抽吸系统的颗粒过滤效率。考虑了两个切割角度、设备的抽吸能力、三种单向位移流速以及噪声暴露。结果表明,在最佳条件下,便携式烟雾抽吸系统可将手术烟雾减少 99%。45°的切割角度、设备的最大抽吸能力和 10500m³/小时的单向位移流速是有利的。如果使用中或最大抽吸能力,声级范围在 51-69dBA 之间,超过了建议的阈值限制。因此,建议使用便携式烟雾抽吸系统。然而,强烈建议将其与一般的单向房间通风相结合,并严格限制使用电外科烧灼。