Mookherjee Monica
SPIRE, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG UK.
Philosophia (Ramat Gan). 2016;44(4):1057-1078. doi: 10.1007/s11406-016-9758-z. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
This article examines debates about political forgiveness in liberal, pluralist societies. Although the concept of forgiveness is not usually taken up by liberals, I outline a plausible conception by exploring two recent approaches. The first, 'unattached articulation', concept requires no real emotional change on the forgiver's part, but rather a form of civic restraint. In contrast, the second version highlights a strong form of empathy for perpetrators. In spite of their advantages, each concept proves too extreme. The problems are revealed by focusing on the case of the Harkis, who fought for the French during the Algerian war. Often still marginalised in French society, their case helps to highlight the conceivability of a 'middle-ground' or moderate concept of political forgiveness. Its core rests on the forgiver's care for the social world. While this concept brings considerable challenges also, and is not inevitable in any particular case, it entails a more plausible combination of emotional and rational shifts in the forgiver's world-view. Although the article does not recommend forgiveness by any person or group, it observes, recalling Arendt's idea of or 'love of the world', that political forgiveness may sustain a viable connection between diverse citizens' public and non-public lives.
本文探讨了自由多元主义社会中关于政治宽恕的争论。尽管宽恕的概念通常不被自由主义者所接受,但我通过探究两种近期的方法勾勒出了一个合理的概念。第一种方法,即“无关联表达”概念,并不要求宽恕者在情感上有真正的改变,而是一种公民克制的形式。相反,第二种观点强调对作恶者的强烈共情。尽管它们有优点,但每个概念都被证明过于极端。通过关注哈基斯人的案例可以揭示这些问题,哈基斯人在阿尔及利亚战争期间为法国而战。他们在法国社会中常常仍被边缘化,他们的案例有助于凸显一种“中间立场”或适度的政治宽恕概念的可设想性。其核心在于宽恕者对社会世界的关切。虽然这个概念也带来了相当大的挑战,并且在任何特定情况下都不是必然的,但它在宽恕者的世界观中带来了情感和理性转变的更合理组合。尽管本文不建议任何个人或群体进行宽恕,但它回顾阿伦特的“对世界的爱”的观点时指出,政治宽恕可能在不同公民的公共生活和非公共生活之间维持一种可行的联系。