James Fiona R, Power Nicola, Laha Shondipon
Critical Care Unit, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK.
Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, UK.
J Intensive Care Soc. 2018 Aug;19(3):247-258. doi: 10.1177/1751143717746566. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
Decision-making by intensivists around accepting patients to intensive care units is a complex area, with often high-stakes, difficult, emotive decisions being made with limited patient information, high uncertainty about outcomes and extreme pressure to make these decisions quickly. This is exacerbated by a lack of clear guidelines to help guide this difficult decision-making process, with the onus largely relying on clinical experience and judgement. In addition to uncertainty compounding decision-making at the individual clinical level, it is further complicated at the multi-speciality level for the senior doctors and surgeons to intensive care units. This is a systematic review of the existing literature about this decision-making process and the factors that help guide these decisions on both sides of the intensive care unit admission dilemma. We found many studies exist assessing the patient factors correlated with intensive care unit admission decisions. Analysing these together suggests that factors consistently found to be correlated with a decision to admit or refuse a patient from intensive care unit are bed availability, severity of illness, initial ward or team referred from, patient choice, do not resuscitate status, age and functional baseline. Less research has been done on the decision-making process itself and the factors that are important to the accepting intensivists; however, similar themes are seen. Even less research exists on referral decision and demonstrates that in addition to the factors correlated with intensive care unit admission decisions, other wider variables are considered by the referring non-intensivists. No studies are available that investigate the decision-making process in referring non-intensivists or the mismatch of processes and pressure between the two sides of the intensive care unit referral dilemma.
重症监护医生在决定是否接收患者进入重症监护病房时,这是一个复杂的领域,往往要在高风险、困难且情绪化的情况下做出决策,而患者信息有限、预后高度不确定,并且要在巨大压力下迅速做出这些决策。由于缺乏明确的指南来帮助指导这一艰难的决策过程,情况变得更加棘手,这一责任很大程度上依赖于临床经验和判断。除了个体临床层面决策时的不确定性加剧之外,对于高级医生和外科医生而言,在多专科层面转诊至重症监护病房时情况进一步复杂化。这是对现有关于这一决策过程以及在重症监护病房收治困境的双方中有助于指导这些决策的因素的文献进行的系统综述。我们发现有许多研究评估了与重症监护病房收治决策相关的患者因素。综合分析这些研究表明,始终被发现与决定接收或拒绝患者进入重症监护病房相关的因素有床位可用性、疾病严重程度、最初转诊的病房或团队、患者选择、不进行心肺复苏状态、年龄和功能基线。对决策过程本身以及对接收患者的重症监护医生而言重要的因素的研究较少;然而,也出现了类似的主题。关于转诊决策的研究更少,并且表明除了与重症监护病房收治决策相关的因素之外,转诊的非重症监护医生还会考虑其他更广泛的变量。目前尚无研究调查转诊的非重症监护医生的决策过程,或者重症监护病房转诊困境双方之间流程和压力的不匹配情况。