Suppr超能文献

对重症监护病床的需求和根据优先标准对患者进行分类。

Demand for Intensive Care beds and patient classification according to the priority criterion.

机构信息

Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, PAHO/WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2021 Oct 29;29. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.4945.3489. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

to assess the demand for Intensive Care Unit beds as well as the classification of the patients for admission, according to the priority system.

METHOD

a retrospective and cross-sectional study, developed from January2014 to December2018 in two Intensive Care Units for adults of a university hospital. The sample consisted of the requests for vacancies according to the priority system(scale from 1 to 4, where 1 is the highest priority and 4 is no priority), registered in the institution's electronic system.

RESULTS

a total of 8,483 vacancies were requested, of which 4,389(51.7%) were from unitB. The highest percentage in unitA was of Priority2 patients(32.6%); and Priority1 was prevalent in unitB(45.4%). The median lead time between request and admission to unitA presented a lower value for priority1 patients(2h57) and a higher value for priority4 patients(11h24); in unitB, priority4 patients presented shorter time(5h54) and priority3 had longer time(11h54). 40.5% of the requests made to unitA and 48.5% of those made to unitB were fulfilled, with 50.7% and 48.5% of these patients being discharged from the units, respectively.

CONCLUSION

it is concluded that the demand for intensive care beds was greater than their availability. Most of the patients assisted were priorities1 and2, although a considerable percentage of those classified as priorities3 and4 is observed.

摘要

目的

根据优先系统评估重症监护病房床位的需求以及患者入院分类。

方法

这是一项回顾性和横断面研究,于 2014 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月在一家大学医院的两个成人重症监护病房进行。样本由根据优先系统(从 1 到 4 级,其中 1 级为最高优先级,4 级为无优先级)在机构电子系统中登记的空位请求组成。

结果

共请求了 8483 个空位,其中 4389 个(51.7%)来自 B 病房。A 病房中优先级 2 患者的比例最高(32.6%);B 病房中优先级 1 患者居多(45.4%)。A 病房中,优先级 1 患者的请求与入院之间的中位前置时间值较低(2h57),优先级 4 患者的中位前置时间值较高(11h24);B 病房中,优先级 4 患者的中位前置时间较短(5h54),优先级 3 患者的中位前置时间较长(11h54)。A 病房中有 40.5%的请求得到满足,B 病房中有 48.5%的请求得到满足,这两个病房中分别有 50.7%和 48.5%的患者出院。

结论

重症监护病房床位的需求大于其供应量。接受治疗的患者大多为优先级 1 和 2,但也观察到相当比例的优先级 3 和 4 患者。

相似文献

7
9
[Intensive care services resources in Spain].[西班牙的重症监护服务资源]
Med Intensiva. 2013 Oct;37(7):443-51. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2013.06.002. Epub 2013 Sep 5.

本文引用的文献

2
Hospitalization and Intensive Therapy at the End of Life.临终时的住院和重症治疗。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 Sep 27;116(39):653-660. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0653.
8
Decision-making in intensive care medicine - A review.重症监护医学中的决策——综述
J Intensive Care Soc. 2018 Aug;19(3):247-258. doi: 10.1177/1751143717746566. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验