Department of Zoology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 91501-970, Brazil.
Department of Landscape, Environment, and Planning, University of Évora, Évora, Portugal.
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Aug 30;190(9):559. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6942-6.
Invasive species are one of the main threats to biodiversity. When an alien species is introduced into a new environment, fast identification and definition of management strategies may avoid or minimize impacts. When an invasive species is already established, the most adopted approaches are population control and monitoring. In order to perform such strategies, assessment of characteristics of the invasive population is imperative. This study tested a new method of population size estimation and monitoring in an invasive population of crayfish Procambarus clarkii in a conservation area in the Atlantic Rain Forest (Southeastern Brazil). The population dynamics was studied for 1 year to examine the efficacy of the selected method and to evaluate if the population is stable. Later, the effect of periodical removal of animals on the population size was tested. The method of population estimation used in this study proved to be very effective. We recommend using it to monitor invasive populations of P. clarkii. The population size varied discretely over the year with variable but low growth rate, indicating that the population is already established which introduce a notable threat to native species. The continuous removal of specimens proved to be inefficient since the growth rate was higher after the removal. One intensive removal event might be more effective than a continuous moderate removal as the one applied in this study.
入侵物种是生物多样性的主要威胁之一。当一个外来物种被引入到一个新的环境中时,快速识别和定义管理策略可以避免或最小化其影响。当一个入侵物种已经建立起来时,最常采用的方法是控制和监测种群。为了执行这些策略,对入侵种群的特征进行评估是至关重要的。本研究测试了一种新的方法,用于评估大西洋雨林(巴西东南部)保护区中小龙虾 Procambarus clarkii 的入侵种群的大小和监测。对种群动态进行了为期 1 年的研究,以检验所选方法的有效性,并评估该种群是否稳定。之后,测试了定期清除动物对种群大小的影响。本研究中使用的种群估计方法非常有效。我们建议将其用于监测小龙虾的入侵种群。种群大小在一年中离散变化,增长率变化不定但较低,这表明该种群已经建立,对本地物种构成了显著威胁。连续清除标本证明是低效的,因为清除后增长率更高。与本研究中应用的连续适度清除相比,集中清除一次可能更有效。