Matsuzaki Shin-Ichiro S, Usio Nisikawa, Takamura Noriko, Washitani Izumi
Department of Ecosystem Studies, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan.
Oecologia. 2009 Jan;158(4):673-86. doi: 10.1007/s00442-008-1180-1. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
Invasion by common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) in shallow lakes have been followed by stable-state changes from a macrophyte-dominated clear water state to a phytoplankton-dominated turbid water state. Both invasive carp and crayfish are, therefore, possible drivers for catastrophic regime shifts. Despite these two species having been introduced into ecosystems world-wide, their relative significance on regime shifts remains largely unexplored. We compared the ecological impacts of carp and crayfish on submerged macrophytes, water quality, phytoplankton, nutrient dynamics, zooplankton and benthic macroinvertebrates by combining an enclosure experiment and a meta-analysis. The experiment was designed to examine how water quality and biological variables responded to increasing carp or crayfish biomass. We found that even at a low biomass, carp had large and positive impacts on suspended solids, phytoplankton and nutrients and negative impacts on benthic macroinvertebrates. In contrast, crayfish had a strong negative impact on submerged macrophytes. The impacts of crayfish on macrophytes were significantly greater than those of carp. The meta-analysis showed that both carp and crayfish have significant effects on submerged macrophytes, phytoplankton, nutrient dynamics and benthic macroinvertebrates, while zooplankton are affected by carp but not crayfish. It also indicated that crayfish have significantly greater impacts on macrophytes relative to carp. Overall, the meta-analysis largely supported the results of the experiment. Taken as a whole, our results show that both carp and crayfish have profound effects on community composition and ecosystem processes through combined consequences of bioturbation, excretion, consumption and non-consumptive destruction. However, key variables (e.g. macrophytes) relating to stable-state changes responded differently to increasing carp or crayfish biomass, indicating that they have differential ecosystem impacts.
在浅水湖泊中,鲤鱼(Cyprinus carpio)和克氏原螯虾(Procambarus clarkii)的入侵导致了稳定状态从大型植物主导的清水状态转变为浮游植物主导的浊水状态。因此,入侵的鲤鱼和小龙虾都可能是灾难性状态转变的驱动因素。尽管这两个物种已被引入世界各地的生态系统,但其对状态转变的相对重要性在很大程度上仍未得到探索。我们通过结合围隔实验和荟萃分析,比较了鲤鱼和小龙虾对沉水大型植物、水质、浮游植物、营养动态、浮游动物和底栖大型无脊椎动物的生态影响。该实验旨在研究水质和生物变量如何响应鲤鱼或小龙虾生物量的增加。我们发现,即使在生物量较低时,鲤鱼对悬浮固体、浮游植物和营养物质也有很大的正向影响,而对底栖大型无脊椎动物有负面影响。相比之下,小龙虾对沉水大型植物有强烈的负面影响。小龙虾对大型植物的影响明显大于鲤鱼。荟萃分析表明,鲤鱼和小龙虾对沉水大型植物、浮游植物、营养动态和底栖大型无脊椎动物都有显著影响,而浮游动物受鲤鱼影响但不受小龙虾影响。这也表明,相对于鲤鱼,小龙虾对大型植物的影响显著更大。总体而言,荟萃分析在很大程度上支持了实验结果。总体来看,我们的结果表明,鲤鱼和小龙虾通过生物扰动、排泄、消费和非消费性破坏的综合影响,对群落组成和生态系统过程都有深远影响。然而,与稳定状态变化相关的关键变量(如大型植物)对鲤鱼或小龙虾生物量增加的反应不同,表明它们对生态系统的影响存在差异。