• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

盆腔器官脱垂的部分可吸收网片或自体组织修复:一项随机对照试验。

Partially absorbable mesh or native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Steures Pieternel, Milani Alfredo L, van Rumpt-van de Geest Deliana A, Kluivers Kirsten B, Withagen Mariëlla I J

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, Postbus 90153, 5200 ME, Den Bosch, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Apr;30(4):565-573. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3757-5. Epub 2018 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-018-3757-5
PMID:30159720
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6450832/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The objective was to compare medium-term efficacy and safety of a partially absorbable mesh kit and native tissue repair in pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Women with primary POP stage ≥ II were randomized to transvaginal trocar-guided partially absorbable mesh (81 women) or native tissue repair (82 women). Primary outcome was overall anatomical success (POP < stage II) at 24 months. Secondary outcomes were composite success, global improvement, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine (85%) of the women allocated to partially absorbable mesh underwent mesh surgery; 8 (10%) crossed over to native tissue repair and 4 women (5%) withdrew from the study. Eighty (98%) of the women allocated to native tissue repair underwent the assigned treatment and 2 (2%) withdrew. Twenty-four months later, 140 surgically treated women (89%) demonstrated an overall anatomical success of 39%; 45% (32 out of 71 women) for mesh, and 32% (22 out of 69) for native tissue repair (RR 1.4, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.2). Composite success was 88 and 73% respectively (RR: 1.1, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.4). There was global improvement in 86% (48 out of 56 women) in the mesh group and in 77% (47 out of 60 women) in the native tissue group (RR: 1.1, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.3). Four women were diagnosed with mesh exposure at 2 years (6%).

CONCLUSION

At 24 months, no significant anatomical or composite benefit of partially absorbable mesh over native tissue repair could be demonstrated in women who had been surgically treated for primary POP.

摘要

引言与假设

目的是比较盆腔器官脱垂(POP)患者中,部分可吸收网片套件与自体组织修复的中期疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

原发性POP≥II期的女性被随机分为经阴道套管针引导的部分可吸收网片组(81例女性)或自体组织修复组(82例女性)。主要结局为24个月时的总体解剖学成功(POP<II期)。次要结局为综合成功、整体改善情况及不良事件。

结果

分配至部分可吸收网片组的69例(85%)女性接受了网片手术;8例(10%)转为自体组织修复,4例(5%)退出研究。分配至自体组织修复组的80例(98%)女性接受了指定治疗,2例(2%)退出。24个月后,140例接受手术治疗的女性(89%)总体解剖学成功率为39%;网片组为45%(71例女性中的32例),自体组织修复组为32%(69例中的22例)(相对危险度1.4,95%置信区间0.92至2.2)。综合成功率分别为88%和73%(相对危险度:1.1,95%置信区间0.93至1.4)。网片组86%(56例女性中的48例)有整体改善,自体组织组为77%(60例中的47例)(相对危险度:1.1,95%置信区间0.92至1.3)。2年时有4例女性被诊断为网片暴露(6%)。

结论

对于接受原发性POP手术治疗的女性,在24个月时,未显示部分可吸收网片相对于自体组织修复有显著的解剖学或综合益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/112f/6450832/ee1f7d3fcde9/192_2018_3757_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/112f/6450832/ee1f7d3fcde9/192_2018_3757_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/112f/6450832/ee1f7d3fcde9/192_2018_3757_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Partially absorbable mesh or native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.盆腔器官脱垂的部分可吸收网片或自体组织修复:一项随机对照试验。
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Apr;30(4):565-573. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3757-5. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
2
Long-term outcome of vaginal mesh or native tissue in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.阴道补片或自体组织用于复发性盆腔器官脱垂的长期疗效:一项随机对照试验
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Jun;29(6):847-858. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3512-3. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
3
Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.女性盆腔器官脱垂的外科治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30(4):CD004014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub5.
4
Transvaginal Mesh Compared With Native Tissue Repair for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.经阴道网片与天然组织修复治疗盆腔器官脱垂的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun 1;139(6):975-985. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004794. Epub 2022 May 2.
5
Serious complications and recurrences after pelvic organ prolapse surgery for 2309 women in the VIGI-MESH registry.VIGI-MESH注册研究中2309名女性盆腔器官脱垂手术后的严重并发症及复发情况。
BJOG. 2022 Mar;129(4):656-663. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16892. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
6
Association between method of pelvic organ prolapse repair involving the vaginal apex and re-operation: a population-based, retrospective cohort study.涉及阴道顶端的盆腔器官脱垂修复方法与再次手术之间的关联:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Apr;30(4):537-544. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3792-2. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
7
Complications of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery in the 2015 Finnish Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery Survey Study.2015 年芬兰盆腔器官脱垂手术调查研究中的盆腔器官脱垂手术并发症。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;136(6):1135-1144. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004159.
8
Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse.前阴道壁修补术与经阴道网片修补术治疗盆腔器官脱垂。
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1826-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009521.
9
Absorbable mesh augmentation compared with no mesh for anterior prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.可吸收补片增强与无补片在前位脱垂中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;123(2 Pt 1):288-294. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000105.
10
A multicenter, randomized trial comparing pelvic organ prolapse surgical treatment with native tissue and synthetic mesh: A 5-year follow-up study.多中心、随机临床试验比较经阴道固有组织和合成网片修补治疗盆腔器官脱垂:5 年随访研究。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Mar;39(3):1002-1011. doi: 10.1002/nau.24323. Epub 2020 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Transvaginal mesh or grafts or native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse.经阴道网片或移植物或自体组织修复阴道脱垂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 13;3(3):CD012079. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012079.pub2.
2
Surgical treatment of advanced anterior wall and apical vaginal prolapse using the anchorless self-retaining support implant: long-term follow-up.采用无锚定自固支撑植入物治疗晚期前壁和顶部阴道脱垂的手术治疗:长期随访。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Nov;33(11):3067-3075. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-05045-w. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
3
Short term complications in mesh augmented vaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse are not higher when compared with native tissue repair.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term outcome of vaginal mesh or native tissue in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.阴道补片或自体组织用于复发性盆腔器官脱垂的长期疗效:一项随机对照试验
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Jun;29(6):847-858. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3512-3. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
2
An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP).国际尿控协会(IUGA)/国际尿失禁学会(ICS)关于女性盆腔器官脱垂(POP)术语的联合报告。
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Apr;27(4):655-84. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3003-y.
3
Anatomical Cystocele Recurrence: Development and Internal Validation of a Prediction Model.
与使用天然组织修复相比,网片增强阴道修复盆底器官脱垂的短期并发症并没有更高。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jul;33(7):1941-1947. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04915-7. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
解剖性膀胱膨出复发:预测模型的制定和内部验证。
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb;127(2):341-7. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001272.
4
Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse.经阴道网状物或移植物与阴道脱垂的自体组织修复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 9;2(2):CD012079. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012079.
5
The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12): validation of the Dutch version.盆腔器官脱垂/尿失禁性功能问卷(PISQ-12):荷兰语版本的验证
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Sep;26(9):1293-303. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2692-y. Epub 2015 May 12.
6
Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery.压力性尿失禁或盆腔器官脱垂手术的终身风险。
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123(6):1201-1206. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000286.
7
Comparison of two trocar-guided trans-vaginal mesh systems for repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective cohort study.两种套管针引导经阴道网片系统修复盆腔器官脱垂的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Oct;24(10):1723-31. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2098-7. Epub 2013 May 1.
8
Time to rethink: an evidence-based response from pelvic surgeons to the FDA Safety Communication: "UPDATE on Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse".是时候重新思考了:盆腔外科医生对美国食品药品监督管理局安全通告《盆腔器官脱垂经阴道植入手术网片相关严重并发症最新情况》的循证回应
Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Jan;23(1):5-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1581-2. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
9
Primary surgical repair of anterior vaginal prolapse: a randomised trial comparing anatomical and functional outcome between anterior colporrhaphy and trocar-guided transobturator anterior mesh.经阴道前壁修补术治疗阴道前壁膨出:经阴道前壁修补术与经阴道闭孔网片修补术治疗阴道前壁膨出的随机对照试验:解剖学和功能结局比较
BJOG. 2011 Nov;118(12):1518-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03082.x. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
10
Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse.前阴道壁修补术与经阴道网片修补术治疗盆腔器官脱垂。
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1826-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009521.