• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种套管针引导经阴道网片系统修复盆腔器官脱垂的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。

Comparison of two trocar-guided trans-vaginal mesh systems for repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Lensen E J M, Withagen M I J, Kluivers K B, Milani A L, Vierhout M E

机构信息

Department Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 791, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands,

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Oct;24(10):1723-31. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2098-7. Epub 2013 May 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-013-2098-7
PMID:23636217
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to compare failure and complication rates in patients who underwent a trocar-guided vaginal mesh repair with either a non-absorbable or a partially absorbable mesh.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from consecutive women undergoing either non-absorbable or partially absorbable mesh for symptomatic stage 2 prolapse or higher were evaluated at 12 months. Outcome measures included objective and subjective failure rates, patient's satisfaction, complications and perioperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Five hundred and sixty-nine women (347 with non-absorbable mesh, 222 with partially absorbable mesh) were included. Failure rates were similar in the two groups; the re-operation rate in the untreated compartments was higher in the non-absorbable mesh group compared with the partially absorbable mesh group (5% vs 1%). Mesh exposure rate in the non-absorbable mesh group was 12% and in the partially absorbable mesh group it was 5%. Other complication and patient satisfaction rates were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-absorbable and partially absorbable mesh demonstrated similar outcome rates at 12 months. The risk of reoperation was lower for partially absorbable mesh. The mesh exposure rate was significantly lower for the partially absorbable mesh group compared with the non-absorbable mesh group.

摘要

引言与假设

本研究旨在比较接受套管针引导下使用不可吸收或部分可吸收网片进行阴道网片修补术患者的失败率和并发症发生率。

方法

对前瞻性收集的连续接受不可吸收或部分可吸收网片治疗有症状的2期或更高期脱垂女性的数据进行回顾性分析,在12个月时进行评估。结果指标包括客观和主观失败率、患者满意度、并发症和围手术期结果。

结果

纳入569名女性(347名使用不可吸收网片,222名使用部分可吸收网片)。两组失败率相似;不可吸收网片组未治疗部位的再次手术率高于部分可吸收网片组(5%对1%)。不可吸收网片组的网片暴露率为12%,部分可吸收网片组为5%。其他并发症和患者满意度相似。

结论

不可吸收和部分可吸收网片在12个月时显示出相似的结果率。部分可吸收网片再次手术的风险较低。部分可吸收网片组的网片暴露率明显低于不可吸收网片组。

相似文献

1
Comparison of two trocar-guided trans-vaginal mesh systems for repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective cohort study.两种套管针引导经阴道网片系统修复盆腔器官脱垂的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Oct;24(10):1723-31. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2098-7. Epub 2013 May 1.
2
Partially absorbable mesh or native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.盆腔器官脱垂的部分可吸收网片或自体组织修复:一项随机对照试验。
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Apr;30(4):565-573. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3757-5. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
3
Non-absorbable and partially-absorbable mesh during pelvic organ prolapse repair: A comparison of clinical outcomes.在盆腔器官脱垂修复术中使用不可吸收和部分可吸收网片:临床结局比较。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jul;55:5-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 May 10.
4
Trocar-guided mesh repair of vaginal prolapse using partially absorbable mesh: 1 year outcomes.经 Trocar 引导的部分可吸收网片在阴道膨出修补术中的应用:1 年随访结果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;204(1):74.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.036. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
5
Rate of re-interventions after transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair using partially absorbable mesh: 20 months median follow-up outcomes.使用部分可吸收网片经阴道盆底器官脱垂修复术后的再次干预率:20个月中位随访结果
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Apr;175:194-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.12.031. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
6
Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.女性盆腔器官脱垂的外科治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30(4):CD004014. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub5.
7
Beyond the complications: medium-term anatomical, sexual and functional outcomes following removal of trocar-guided transvaginal mesh. A retrospective cohort study.除并发症外:拔除套管针引导的经阴道网片后的中期解剖学、性功能和功能结局。一项回顾性队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Oct;23(10):1391-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1746-7. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
8
Association between method of pelvic organ prolapse repair involving the vaginal apex and re-operation: a population-based, retrospective cohort study.涉及阴道顶端的盆腔器官脱垂修复方法与再次手术之间的关联:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Apr;30(4):537-544. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3792-2. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
9
Outcomes of trocar-guided Gynemesh PS™ versus single-incision trocarless Polyform™ transvaginal mesh procedures.套管针引导下的Gynemesh PS™与单切口无套管针Polyform™经阴道网片手术的疗效比较
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Jan;26(1):71-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2467-x. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
10
Anchor vs suture for the attachment of vaginal mesh in a robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a randomized clinical trial.在机器人辅助经阴道骶骨阴道固定术中,网片固定采用锚钉与缝线的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):258.e1-258.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.018. Epub 2020 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term outcome (5-10 years) after non absorbable mesh insertion compared to partially absorbable mesh insertion for anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair.非可吸收网片与部分可吸收网片在前阴道壁膨出修补术中的长期疗效(5-10 年)比较。
Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Nov-Dec;45(6):1180-1185. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0141.
2
Partially absorbable mesh or native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.盆腔器官脱垂的部分可吸收网片或自体组织修复:一项随机对照试验。
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Apr;30(4):565-573. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3757-5. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
3
Multicenter, randomized trial comparing native vaginal tissue repair and synthetic mesh repair for genital prolapse surgical treatment.

本文引用的文献

1
Urinary incontinence after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.盆腔器官脱垂手术后的尿失禁。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2013 Jun;32(5):455-9. doi: 10.1002/nau.22327. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
2
Comparison of vaginal mesh extrusion rates between a lightweight type I polypropylene mesh versus heavier mesh in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.在盆腔器官脱垂治疗中,轻质I型聚丙烯网片与较重网片的阴道网片挤出率比较。
Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Oct;23(10):1379-86. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1744-9. Epub 2012 May 10.
3
Biomechanical effects of polyglecaprone fibers in a polypropylene mesh after abdominal and rectovaginal implantation in a rabbit.
一项多中心随机试验,比较天然阴道组织修复与合成网片修复用于生殖器脱垂手术治疗的效果。
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Mar;26(3):335-42. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2501-z. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
聚甘醇酸纤维在聚丙烯网片中对兔腹部及直肠阴道植入后的生物力学影响
Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Oct;23(10):1397-402. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1739-6. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
4
Outcomes and predictors of failure of trocar-guided vaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.经阴道网片手术治疗盆腔器官脱垂失败的结局和预测因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 May;206(5):440.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.039. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
5
The use of synthetic mesh in vaginal prolapse surgery: a survey of Dutch urogynaecologists.在阴道脱垂手术中使用合成网片:荷兰尿妇科医生的调查。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 May;162(1):113-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.02.004. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
6
Development of de novo prolapse in untreated vaginal compartments after prolapse repair with and without mesh: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.经阴道修补术(有无网片)后未治疗阴道隔新发脱垂的发展:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
BJOG. 2012 Feb;119(3):354-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03231.x.
7
A prospective comparison of two commercial mesh kits in the management of anterior vaginal prolapse.两种商用网片套件用于治疗阴道前壁脱垂的前瞻性比较。
Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Mar;23(3):279-83. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1578-x.
8
Risk factors for exposure, pain, and dyspareunia after tension-free vaginal mesh procedure.阴道无张力网片修补术后暴露、疼痛和性交困难的危险因素。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;118(3):629-636. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822ada95.
9
The prevalence and factors associated with previous surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and/or urinary incontinence in a cross-sectional study in The Netherlands.荷兰一项横断面研究中,盆腔器官脱垂和/或尿失禁既往手术的患病率及相关因素。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Oct;158(2):343-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.04.029. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
10
Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial.经 Trocar 引导的网片与传统阴道修复术治疗复发性脱垂的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Feb;117(2 Pt 1):242-250. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318203e6a5.